Elsevier

Metabolism

Volume 40, Issue 9, September 1991, Pages 990-996
Metabolism

Regional differences in triglyceride breakdown in human adipose tissue: Effects of catecholamines, insulin, and prostaglandin E2

https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(91)90078-BGet rights and content

Abstract

Regional variation of adipose tissue triglyceride breakdown (lipolysis) has been suggested to play a role for the health consequences of some forms of obesity. Thus, in the present study we investigated the regulation of lipolysis in isolated adipocytes obtained from different fat depots in females. Intra-abdominal adipose tissue (omental) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were obtained from the same individuals undergoing abdominal surgery (n = 9); in addition, adipocytes from the subcutaneous gluteal region (n = 12) and from mammary adipose tissue (n = 5) were investigated. The lipolytic/antilipolytic properties of epinephrine (EPI), insulin, clonidine, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were investigated. The most prominent observation was that EPI had none or only minor lipolytic effect in adipocytes from the subcutaneous regions, but significantly enhanced lipolysis by approximately 500% in omental adipocytes (P < .001). In the presence of the α2-adrenergic antagonist, yohimbine, EPI had similar stimulatory effects (fourfold to fivefold) in all fat depots. The antilipolytic compounds, insulin and clonidine, had greatly reduced antilipolytic properties in omental adipocytes as compared with subcutaneous adipocytes (P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). On the other hand, PGE2 had similar antilipolytic properties in adipocytes from the various depots. In conclusion, we found great regional variation in the regulation of lipolysis. Particularly, EPI was much more lipolytic in omental adipocytes than in subcutaneous adipocytes, mainly due to an enhanced functional α2-receptor activity in subcutaneous adipocytes. These in vitro data suggest that free fatty acids (FFA) are more readily mobilized from omental adipose tissue than from subcutaneous adipose tissue.

References (28)

  • P Björntorp

    The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease

    Acta Med Scand

    (1988)
  • AH Kissebah et al.

    Biology of regional body fat distribution: Relationship to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

    Diabetes Metab Rev

    (1989)
  • M Ashwell et al.

    New insight into the anthropometric classification of fat distribution shown by computer tomography

    Br Med J

    (1985)
  • AN Peiris et al.

    Adiposity, fat distribution, and cardiovascular risk

    Ann Intern Med

    (1989)
  • Cited by (156)

    • Obesity and insulin resistance: pathophysiology guiding precision therapy

      2024, Insulin: Deficiency, Excess and Resistance in Human Disease
    • Visceral Fat: Culprit or Canary?

      2020, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The only exceptions are adipocytes in the bone marrow, breast, and the epicardium; these adipocytes abut nonadipose tissue cells and thus can directly affect the function of adjacent cells independent of the circulation. The major adipose depots described above also differ in terms of the average size of the adipocytes,13 the responsiveness of the adipocytes to prolipolytic and antilipolytic hormones,15–17 the propensity of the adipocytes to take up and store fatty acids,18–20 as well as immune cell infiltration.21 The utilitarian rationale for defining human body fat compartments into lower-body fat, upper-body subcutaneous fat, and intraabdominal/visceral fat rests on the fact that the compartments can be measured using only dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and a single-slice computed tomographic or MRI scan of the abdomen.22,23

    • The sexual dimorphism of obesity

      2015, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Human fat cells express lipolytic β1–2 and antilipolytic α2-adrenergic receptors providing an additional mechanism to regulate lipolysis/lipogenesis and the filling of adipose tissues. A sexual dimorphism exists in the distribution of these receptors to account for sex- and depot-specific differences in the modulation of lipolysis (Richelsen, 1986; Richelsen et al., 1991). Estradiol increases α2-adrenergic receptors in subcutaneous adipose tissue but has no effect on adrenergic receptors in intraabdominal adipocytes (Pedersen et al., 2004).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grants from NOVO, Nordic Insulin Foundation, the Danish Diabetic Association, P. Carl Petersens Fond, Aarhus University, and Danish Medical Research Council.

    View full text