Copyright © 1993 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Minireview
Towards a molecular resolution of the ordinal phylogeny of the eutherian mammals
Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University. Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
Received 4 March 1993;
Abstract
Reconstructing the evolutionary relationships among the orders of eutherian mammals entails the identification of a single true phylogenetic tree out of approximately 1019 possible ones. The morphological and paleontological legacy to the field consists of numerous contradictory trees that are mostly devoid of binary resolution. With the introduction of molecular methodologies, several superordinal relationships have been identified, and in several instances a complete taxonomic revision was indicated. In this review, I present a summary of the phylogenetic affinities of the eutherian orders as revealed by molecular studies, and outline the differences between the molecular phylogenetic schemes and the phylogenetic trees produced through the use of morphological data. Questions of monophyly or paraphyly of the eutherian orders are also discussed. It is estimated that all but 109 of the 1019 possible phylogenetic trees have been ruled out by molecular analysis, and that DNA and protein sequences with their potential to supply millions of phylogenetically useful characters will resolve the phylogeny of the orders of mammals into a consistently bifurcating tree in the not-so-distant future.
Author Keywords: Molecular phylogeny; Eutheria
References
1. W.-H. Li and D. Graur Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution, Sinauer (199).
2. J. Felsenstein Syst. Zool. 27 (1978), pp. 27–33.
3. G.G. Simpson Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85 (1945), pp. 1–350.
4. G.G. Simpson Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 122 (1978), pp. 318–328.
5. M.J. Benton Trends Ecol. Evol. 3 (1988), pp. 40–45. Abstract |
PDF (1349 K)
| View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (4)
6. W.K. Gregory Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27 (1910), pp. 1–524.
7. M.C. McKenna In: W.P. Luckett and F.S. Szalay, Editors, Phylogeny of the Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Plenum (1975), pp. 21–46.
8. M.J. Novacek In: M. Goodman, Editor, Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Plenum (1982), pp. 3–41.
9. M.J. Novacek Nature 356 (1992), pp. 121–125. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (336)
10. M.J. Novacek and A.R. Wyss Cladistics 2 (1986), pp. 257–287.
11. M.J. Novacek, A.R. Wyss and M.C. McKenna In: M.J. Benton, Editor, The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Clarendon (1988), pp. 31–71.
12. J. Shoshani Mol. Biol. Evol. 3 (1986), pp. 222–242. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (28)
13. M.M. Miyamoto and M. Goodman Syst. Zool. 35 (1986), pp. 230–240.
14. J. Czelusniak et al.Curr. Mammalogy 2 (1990), pp. 545–572.
15. A.R. Wyss, M.J. Novacek and M.C. McKenna Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987), pp. 99–116. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (12)
16. D. Hewett-Emmett and R.E. Tashian In: S.J. Dodgson, R.E. Tashian, G. Gros and N.D. Carter, Editors, The Carbonic Anhydrases, Plenum (1991), pp. 15–32.
17. D. Hewett-Emmett, P.J. Hopkins, R.E. Tashian and J. Czelusniak Ann. NY Aead. Sci. 429 (1984), pp. 338–358. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (21)
18. R.E. Tashian, D. Hewett-Emmett, S.K. Stroup, M. Goodman and Y.-S.L. Yu In: C. Bauer, G. Gros and H. Bartels, Editors, Biophysics and Physiology of Carbon Dioxide, Springer-Verlag (1980), pp. 165–176.
19. M. Yasunami, C.-S. Chen and A. Yoshida Biochem. Genet. 28 (1990), pp. 591–599. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)
20. U. Arnason, A. Gullberg and B. Widegren J. Mol. Evol. 33 (1991), pp. 556–568. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (154)
21. D.M. Irwin, T.D. Kocher and A.C. Wilson J. Mol. Evol. 32 (1991), pp. 128–144. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (919)
22. U. Arnason and E. Johnsson J. Mol. Evol. 34 (1992), pp. 493–505. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (129)
23. W.-H. Li, M. Gouy, P.A. Sharp, C. O'hUigin and Y.-W. Yang Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990), pp. 6703–6707. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (110)
24. R.M. Adkins and R.L. Honeycutt Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991), pp. 10317–10321. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (49)
25. W.J. Bailey, J.L. Slightom and M. Goodman Science 256 (1992), pp. 86–89. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (51)
26. D.P. Mindell, C.W. Dick and R.J. Baker Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991), pp. 10322–10326. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (34)
27. J.D. Pettigrew Science 231 (1986), pp. 1304–1306. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (75)
28. J.D. Pettigrew Syst. Zool. 40 (1991), pp. 199–216.
29. J. Shoshani Isr. J. Zool. 38 (1992), pp. 233–244.
30. D.R. Prothero, E.M. Manning and M. Fischer In: M.J. Benton, Editor, The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Clarendon (1988), pp. 201–234.
31. S. Easteal Genetics 124 (1990), pp. 165–173. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (31)
32. Jong W.W. De, J.A.M. Leunissen and G.J. Wistow In: F.S. Szalay, M.J. Novacek and M.C. McKenna, Editors, Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals, Springer-Verlag (1993), pp. 5–12.
33. D. Graur, W.A. Hide and W.-H. Li Nature 351 (1991), pp. 649–652. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (138)
34. D. Graur, W.A. Hide, A. Zharkikh and W.-H. Li Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 101B (1992), pp. 495–498. Abstract |
PDF (323 K)
| View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (22)
35. W.-H. Li, W.A. Hide and D. Graur Nature 359 (1992), pp. 277–278. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (8)
36. W.-H. Li, W.A. Hide, A. Zharkikh, D.-P. Ma and D. Graur J. Hered. 83 (1992), pp. 174–181. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (32)
37. M.W. Allard, M.M. Miyamoto and R.L. Honeycutt Nature 353 (1991), pp. 610–611. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (10)
38. Jong W.W. De Mol. Biol. Evol. 3 (1986), pp. 276–281.
39. R.M. Nowak In: (5th Edition ed.),Walker's Mammals of the World, Johns Hopkins University Press (1991).







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (14)





