Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a critical review of the related literature on 3D printing in construction. The paper discusses and evaluates the different 3D printing techniques in construction. The paper also discusses and categorizes the benefits, challenges, and risks of 3D printing in construction. The use of 3D printing technology offers several advantages over traditional methods. However, it comes with its own additional challenges and risks. The main benefits of 3D printing in construction include constructability and sustainability benefits. The challenges are categorized into seven groups. The main challenges, found through the literature, are material related. The most cited challenges are material printability, buildability, and open time. Additionally, scalability, structural integrity, and lack of codes and regulations are frequently cited as major challenges. The additional risks are categorized into seven groups: 3D printing material, 3D printing equipment, construction site, and environment, management, stakeholders, regulatory and economic, and cybersecurity risks. The paper fills a gap in the literature as it addresses a new aspect of 3D printing, which is risk. The paper also provides some insights, recommendations, and future research ideas.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerbert P, Castagnino S, Rothballer C, Renz A, Filitz R. The transformative power of building information modeling, March 08, 2016 Boston Consulting Group. 2016. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/engineered-products-project-business-digital-engineering-construction/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.

  2. Horvath J. Mastering 3D printing (technology in action). Berkeley: Apress; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-0025-4.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Maskuriy R, Selamat A, Maresova P, Krejcar A, Olalekan David O. Industry 4.0 for the construction industry: review of management perspective. Economies. 2019;68(7):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7030068.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bock T. The future of construction automation: technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Autom Constr. 2015;59:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. García de Soto B, Agustí-Juan I, Hunhevicz J, Joss S, Graser K, Habert G, Adey B. Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall. Autom Constr. 2018;92:297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M. How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng. 2014;8(1):37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oesterreich TD, Teuteberg F. Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput Ind. 2016;83:121–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dallasegaa P, Raucha E, Linderb C. Industry 4.0 as an enabler of proximity for construction supply chains: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind. 2018;99:205–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.039.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alaloul WS, Liew MS, Zawawi NW, Mohammed BS. Industry revolution IR 4.0: future opportunities and challenges in construction industry. In: MATEC web of conferences 203, 2010. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820302010.

  10. Hager I, Golonka A, Putanowicz R. 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Procedia Eng. 2016;151:292–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Noorani R. 3D printing: technology, applications, and selection. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kietzmann J, Pitt L, Berthon P. Disruptions, decisions, and destinations: enter the age of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Bus Horiz. 2015;58(2):209–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Davtalab O, Kazemian A, Khoshnevis B. Perspectives on a BIM-integrated software platform for robotic construction through contour crafting. Autom Constr. 2018;89:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.01.006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Camacho D, Clayton P, O’Brien W, Seepersad C, Juenger M, Ferron R, Salamone S. Applications of additive manufacturing in the construction industry: a forward-looking review. Autom Constr. 2018;89:110–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.031.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yossef M, Chen A. Applicability and limitations of 3D printing for civil structures. Civ Constr Environ Eng Conf Present Proc. 2015;35:87–99.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, Austin SA, Gibb AG, Thorpe T. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom Constr. 2011;21:262–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. A critical review of the use of 3D printing in the construction industry. Autom Constr. 2016;68:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. PMBOK. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 6th ed. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute Standards Committee, PMI; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barber R. Understanding internally generated risks in projects. Int J Project Manag. 2005;23(8):584–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. ANDI. The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects. Constr Manag Econ. 2006;24(1):69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500310338.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Sayegh S. Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry. Int J Project Manag. 2008;26(4):431–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung K-Y, Roh M-S. A study for an appropriate risk management of new technology deployment in nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy. 2016;99:157–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.08.013.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Conner BP, Manogharan GP, Meyers KL. An assessment of implementation of entry-level 3D printers from the perspective of small businesses. Rapid Prototyp J. 2015;21(5):582–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0132.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Malone D. 2017. https://www.bdcnetwork.com/europe%E2%80%99s-first-3d-printed-building-has-been-completed. Accessed 22 Feb 2019.

  25. Paul S, Van Zijl G, Tan M, Gibson I. A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: current status and future research prospects. Rapid Prototyp J. 2018;24(4):784–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0154.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghaffar S, Corker J, Fan M. Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution. Autom Constr. 2018;93:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uppalla S, Tadikamalla M. A review on 3D printing of concrete—the future of sustainable construction. I-Manager’s J Civ Eng. 2017;7(3):49–62. https://doi.org/10.26634/jce.7.3.13610.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Labonnote N, Rønnquist A, Manum B, Rüther P. Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Autom Constr. 2016;72:347–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, Salet T. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2016;11(3):209–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, Noor Mohamed NA, Tan MJ, Leong KF. 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(3):261–76.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shakor P, Nejadi S, Paul G, Malek S. Review of emerging additive manufacturing technologies in 3D printing of cementitious materials in the construction industry. Front Built Environ. 2019;4:85.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hamidi F, Aslani F. Additive manufacturing of cementitious composites: materials, methods, potentials, and challenges. Constr Build Mater. 2019;218:582–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.140.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. ISO/ASTM52900-15. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing—general principles—terminology. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. D-shape.com. D-shape building process. 2019. https://d-shape.com/the-technology/d-shape-building-process/. Accessed 7 Apr 2019.

  36. Xu J, Ding L, Love P. Digital reproduction of historical building ornamental components: from 3D scanning to 3D printing. Autom Constr. 2017;76:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.01.010.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yeon J, Kang J, Yan W. Spall damage repair using 3D printing technology. Autom Constr. 2018;89:266–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.003.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mueller RP, Howe S, Kochmann D, Ali H, Andersen C, Burgoyne H, Chambers W, Clinton R, De Kestellier X, Ebelt K, Gerner S, Hofmann D, Hogstrom K, Ilves E, Jerves A, Keenan R, Keravala J, Khoshnevis B, Lim S, Metzger P, Meza L, Nakamura T, Nelson A, Partridge H, Pettit D, Pyle R, Reiners E, Shapiro A, Singer R, Tan W-L, Vazquez N, Wilcox B, Zelhofer A. Automated additive construction (AAC) for earth and space using in-situ resources. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth biennial ASCE aerospace division international conference on engineering, science, construction, and operations in challenging environments (Earth & Space 2016). Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2016. http://oro.open.ac.uk/45865/1/3Dadditive_paper_final.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  39. Ingaglio J, Fox J, Naito CJ, Bocchini P. Material characteristics of binder jet 3D printed hydrated CSA cement with the addition of fine aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2019;206:494–503.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shakor P, Sanjayan J, Nazari A, Nejadi S. Modified 3D printed powder to cement-based material and mechanical properties of cement scaffold used in 3D printing. Constr Build Mater. 2017;138:398–409.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lowke D, Dini E, Perrot A, Weger D, Gehlen C, Dillenburger B. Particle-bed 3D printing in concrete construction: possibilities and challenges. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.018.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Khoshnevis B, Hwang D, Yao KT, Yeh Z. Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 2006;1(3):301–20. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2006.009791.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Craveiro F, Bartolo H, Gale A, Duarte J, Bartolo P. A design tool for resource-efficient fabrication of 3D-graded structural building components using additive manufacturing. Autom Constr. 2017;82:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.05.006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Duballet R, Baverel O, Dirrenberger J. Classification of building systems for concrete 3D printing. Autom Constr. 2017;83:247–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.018.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gosselin C, Duballet R, Roux P, Gaudillière N, Dirrenberger J, Morel P. Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete: a new processing route for architects and builders. Mater Des. 2016;100:102–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Autom Constr. 2017;83:212–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Apis Cor. We print buildings. http://www.apis-cor.com/en/. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  48. Zhang X, Li M, Lim J, Weng Y, Tay Y, Pham H, Pham Q. Large-scale 3D printing by a team of mobile robots. Autom Constr. 2018;95:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Barnett E, Gosselin C. Large-scale 3D printing with a cable-suspended robot. Addit Manuf. 2015;7:27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.05.001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. https://www.constructionweekonline.com/products-services/257548-video-cobod-set-to-ship-worlds-largest-3d-printer-to-saudi-arabia.

  51. Kothman I, Faber N. How 3D printing technology changes the rules of the game. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2016;27(7):932–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2016-0010.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Feng L, Yuhong L. Study on the status quo and problems of 3D printed buildings in China. Glob J Hum Soc Sci H Interdiscip. 2014;14(5):7–10.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. 3D Printers, WASP, Leading Company in the 3D printing industry. 2019. https://www.3dwasp.com/en/. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  54. Le T, Austin S, Lim S, Buswell R, Gibb A, Thorpe T. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct. 2012;45(8):1221–32. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Buswell RA, Leal de Silva WR, Jones SZ, Dirrenberger J. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cemex Ventures. Benefits of 3D printing in construction. 2019. https://www.cemexventures.com/benefits-of-3d-printing-in-construction/. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.

  57. Le T, Austin S, Lim S, Buswell R, Law R, Gibb A, Thorpe T. Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(3):558–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Papachristoforou M, Mitsopoulos V, Stefanidou M. Evaluation of workability parameters in 3D printing concrete. Procedia Struct Integr. 2018;10:155–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.09.023.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Wangler T, Lloret E, Reiter L, Hack N, Gramazio F, Kohler M, Flatt R. Digital concrete: opportunities and challenges. Rilem Tech Lett. 2016;1:67–75. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hambach M, Volkmer D. Properties of 3D-printed fiber-reinforced portland cement paste. Cem Concr Compos. 2017;79:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.02.001.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Doo-Yeol Y, Young-Soo Y. A review on structural behavior, design, and application of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater. 2016;10(2):125–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0143-x.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Ducoulombier N, Chateau C, Bornert M, Caron J-F, Weitkamp T, Perrin J. Characterisation and modelling of interfacial damage in fibre reinforced concrete for 3D printing in construction. In: 10th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures, June 2019, Bayonne, France. https://doi.org/10.21012/FC10.235562.

  63. Bos F, Bosco E, Salet T. Ductility of 3D printed concrete reinforced with short straight steel fibers. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2019;14(2):160–74.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Feng P, Meng X, Zhang H. Mechanical behavior of FRP sheets reinforced 3D elements printed with cementitious materials. Compos Struct. 2015;134:331–42.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Arayici Y, Egbu CO, Coates SP. Building information modelling (BIM) implementation and remote construction projects: issues, challenges, and critiques. J Inf Technol Constr. 2012;17:75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Robichaud L, Anantatmula VS. Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. J Manag Eng. 2011;27(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000030.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Feng P, Meng X, Chen J, Ye L. Mechanical properties of structures 3D printed with cementitious powders. Constr Build Mater. 2015;93:486–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.132.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang J, Hu Z. BIM- and 4D-based integrated solution of analysis and management for conflicts and structural safety problems during construction: 1. Principles and methodologies. Autom Constr. 2011;20(2):155–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.013.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. World Economic Forum. Winsun: demonstrating the viability of 3D printing at the construction scale. 2016. https://futureofconstruction.org/case/winsun/. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  70. Dubai Future Foundation. Dubai 3D printing strategy. www.dubaifuture.gov.ae/our-initiatives/dubai-3d-printing-strategy/#1458229619399-0dfdadfa-8f328fc7-fbc6. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.

  71. D Printhuset. The construction of Europe’s first 3D Printed building has begun and is almost complete. 3D Printhuset. http://www.3dprinthuset.dk/europes-first-3d-printed-building/. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.

  72. CyBe. Redefining construction by enabling 3D concrete printing by providing hardware, software, material, education, certification and business development. CyBe Construction. http://www.cybe.eu/. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.

  73. CNN Style. The world’s longest 3D-printed concrete bridge is finished. 2019. https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/shanghai-3d-printed-bridge-scli-intl/index.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.

  74. Buswell RA, Soar RC, Gibb AGF, Thorpe A. Freeform construction: mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Autom Constr. 2007;16(2):224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.05.002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Campbell T, Williams C, Ivanova O, Garrett B. Could 3D printing change the world? Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing. Atlantic Council. 2011. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/files/publication_pdfs/403/101711_ACUS_3DPrinting.PDF. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  76. Khoshnevis B. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr. 2004;13(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Chen Q, García de Soto B, Adey B. Construction automation: research areas, industry concerns and suggestions for advancement. Autom Constr. 2018;94:22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.028.

    Google Scholar 

  78. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Our common future (Oxford paperbacks). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Karakhan AM, Gambatese JM. Identification, quantification, and classification of potential safety risk for sustainable construction in the United States. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001302.

  80. Perrot A, Rangeard D, Courteille E. 3D printing of earth-based materials: processing aspects. Constr Build Mater. 2018;172:670–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.017.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang Z, Provis J, Reid A, Wang H. Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater. 2014;56:113–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Xia M, Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J. Printability, accuracy and strength of geopolymer made using powder-based 3D printing for construction applications. Autom Constr. 2019;101:179–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.013.

    Google Scholar 

  83. OECD. Material resources, productivity and the environment. OECD green growth studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190504-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  84. Zou P, Zhang G. Comparative study on the perception of construction safety risks in China and Australia. J Constr Eng Manag. 2009;135(7):620–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000019.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Whirlwind Team. Impacts of 3D printing on the construction industry. https://www.whirlwindsteel.com/blog/impacts-of-3d-printing-on-the-construction-industry. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  86. Costanzi C, Ahmed Z, Schipper H, Bos F, Knaack U, Wolfs R. 3D printing concrete on temporary surfaces: the design and fabrication of a concrete shell structure. Autom Constr. 2018;94:395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.013.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Perkins I, Skitmore M. Three-dimensional printing in the construction industry: a review. Int J Constr Manag. 2015;15(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2015.1012136.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Panda B, Tay Y, Paul S, Tan M. Current challenges and future potential of 3D concrete printing. Mater Sci Eng Technol. 2018;49(5):666–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201700279.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Paul S, Tay Y, Panda B, Tan M. Fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable cementitious materials for building and construction. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2018;18(1):311–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.02.008.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Bridges SM, Keiser K, Sissom N, Graves SJ. Cyber security for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual cyber and information security research conference article no. 14, New York, 2015. New York: ACM International Conference Proceedings Series; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746266.2746280.

  91. Berman B. 3D printing: the new industrial revolution. IEEE Eng Manag Rev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2013.6693869.

  92. Shakor P, Nejadi S, Paul G. A study into the effect of different nozzles shapes and fibre-reinforcement in 3D printed mortar. Materials. 2019;12:1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101708.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Kreiger MA, MacAllister BA, Wilhoit JM, Case MP. The current state of 3D printing for use in construction. In: Proceedings of the 2015 conference on autonomous and robotic construction of infrastructure, Ames, Iowa; 2015. pp. 149–158.

  94. Hwang B, Shan M, Supa’at N. Green commercial building projects in Singapore: critical risk factors and mitigation measures. Sustain Cities Soc. 2017;30(7):237–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.020.

    Google Scholar 

  95. El-Sayegh S, Manjikian S, Ibrahim A, Abouelyousr A, Jabbour R. Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. Int J Constr Manag. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1536963.

  96. Robinson P. Project learning with 3D printing: 3D materials and construction possibilities. New York: Cavendish Square Publishing; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/aus-ebooks/reader.action?docID=5404812. Accessed 7 Apr 2019. ISBN 9781502631473.

  97. Zayed T, Amer M, Pan J. Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. Int J Project Manag. 2008;26(4):408–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.012.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Al-Hajj A, Hamani K. Material waste in the UAE construction industry: main causes and minimization practices. Archit Eng Des Manag. 2011;7(4):221–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2011.594576.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Popov G, Lyon BK, Hollcroft B. Risk assessment: a practical guide to assessing operational risks. 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2019. ISBN-13: 978-1628251845.

  100. Mathews K. Avoid common robotics hazards by following these 6 rules. 2019. Blog.robotiq.com. https://blog.robotiq.com/avoid-these-common-robotics-hazards-by-following-these-6-rules. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.

  101. Chinniah Y. Robot safety: overview of risk assessment and reduction. Adv Robot Autom. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9695.1000139.

  102. Li R. An economic analysis on automated construction safety: internet of things, artificial intelligence and 3D printing. Singapore: Springer; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5771-7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  103. Salet T, Ahmed Z, Bos F, Laagland H. Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13(3):222–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1476064.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. Kartam N, Kartam S. Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors’ perspective. Int J Project Manag. 2001;19(6):325–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00014-4.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Tang W, Qiang M, Duffield C. Risk management in the Chinese construction industry. J Constr Eng Manag. 2007;133(12):944–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:12(944).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  106. Chapman R. The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management. Int J Project Manag. 2001;19(3):147–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00070-8.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  107. Wang S, Dulaimi M, Aguria M. Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries. Constr Manag Econ. 2004;22(3):237–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000124689.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Travelers.com. 2019. https://www.travelers.com/iw-documents/business-insurance/tech-3D-whitepaper-BTCWH.0003D.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.

  109. Sköld G, Vidarsson H. Analyzing the potentials of 3D-printing in the construction industry. A thesis in supply chain management (master’s thesis). Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.

  110. Bak D. Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter. Assem Autom. 2003;23(4):340–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310501190.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  111. Zeltmann S, Gupta N, Tsoutsos N, Maniatakos M, Rajendran J, Karri R. Manufacturing and security challenges in 3D printing. JOM. 2016;68(7):1872–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1937-7.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  112. Panda B, Paul SC, Tan MJ. Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material. Mater Lett. 2017;209:146–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.123.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  113. Workplace health and safety Queensland. Guide to machinery and equipment safety. 2015. https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/82783/guidetomachinery-equipmentsafety.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  114. Sweis G, Sweis R, Abuhammad A, Shboul A. Delays in construction projects: the case of Jordan. Int J Project Manag. 2008;26(6):665–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.009.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ling F, Hoi L. Risks faced by Singapore firms when undertaking construction projects in India. Int J Project Manag. 2006;24(3):261–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.003.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Zou P, Zhang G, Wang J. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Project Manag. 2007;25(6):601–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  117. El-Sayegh S, Mansour M. Risk assessment and allocation in highway construction projects in the UAE. J Manag Eng. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000365.

  118. Faridi A, El-Sayegh S. Significant factors causing delay in the UAE construction industry. Constr Manag Econ. 2006;24(11):1167–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600827033.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  119. Ghosh S, Jintanapakanont J. Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: a factor analysis approach. Int J Project Manag. 2004;22(8):633–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  120. Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer K, Rentala S. Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. Int J Project Manag. 2012;30(4):479–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Al-Saleh Y, Taleb H. The integration of sustainability within value management practices: a study of experienced value managers in the GCC countries. Project Manag J. 2010;41(2):50–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20147.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  122. Fang D, Li M, Fong PS, Shen L. Risks in Chinese construction market—contractors’ perspective. J Constr Eng Manag. 2004;130(6):853–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:6(853).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  123. Zhi H. Risk management for overseas construction projects. Int J Project Manag. 1995;13(4):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00015-I.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by funding from the American University of Sharjah (Grant No. EFRG18-SCR-CEN-42).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

    S. El-Sayegh & S. Manjikian

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

    L. Romdhane

Authors
  1. S. El-Sayegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Romdhane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Manjikian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. El-Sayegh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Sayegh, S., Romdhane, L. & Manjikian, S. A critical review of 3D printing in construction: benefits, challenges, and risks. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 20, 34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w

Keywords