Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Dexamethasone Co-Treatment During Ovarian Stimulation in Women of Different Reproductive Age With Elevated Early Follicular Phase Progesterone Level: a Prospective Longitudinal Study

  • Regenerative Medicine: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to estimate the effect of dexamethasone during ovarian stimulation in women of different reproductive age with elevated early follicular phase progesterone level undergoing fresh IVF cycle. This study is a prospective longitudinal analysis of consecutive women who underwent fresh IVF cycles at a single center, between January 2012 to December 2013. Women with early follicular phase progesterone above 0.50 ng/ml, assessed in day 0 or day 5 of stimulation, were included. Study group (n = 113) included women who underwent dexamethasone supplementation until the day of triggering. Women who did not undergo dexamethasone treatment formed the control group (n = 109). We further stratified our study population according to age ranges: (1) ≤ 34 years, (2) between 35 and 39 years, and (3) ≥ 40 years. Significantly lower progesterone levels were observed in study than in control group (0.59 ± 0.21 vs 0.94 ± 0.42, p < 0.001). Such difference is not observed in women above 39 years old. Higher, albeit not significant, live birth rate was detected in the study versus control group, considering the overall population. In women ≤ 34 years old, a significantly higher live birth rate was observed in women who underwent dexametasone treatment than in the control group (67.5% vs 47.2%, p = 0.04). Conversely, live birth rates were similar between groups in women above 34 years old. Our data suggest that dexamethasone helps to modulate progesterone levels during the follicular phase and might improve live birth rate of women below 34 years old.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Lainas GT, Sfontouris IA, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Basal serum progesterone and history of elevated progesterone on the day of hCG administration are significant predictors of late follicular progesterone elevation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1859–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdon M, Ouazana M, Maignien C, Pocate-Cheriet K, Patrat C, Marcellin L, et al. Impact of supraphysiological estradiol serum levels on birth weight in singletons born after fresh embryo transfer. Reprod Sci. 2020;27:1770–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Vaerenbergh I, Fatemi HM, Blockeel C, Van Lommel L, In’t Veld P, Schuit F, et al. Progesterone rise on HCG day in GnRH antagonist/rFSH stimulated cycles affects endometrial gene expression. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;22:263–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Healy MW, Yamasaki M, Patounakis G, Richter KS, Devine K, DeCherney AH, et al. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:362–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Racca A, Santos-Ribeiro S, De Munck N, Mackens S, Drakopoulos P, Camus M, et al. Impact of late-follicular phase elevated serum progesterone on cumulative live birth rates: is there a deleterious effect on embryo quality? Hum Reprod. 2018;33:860–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simón C, Remohí J, Jenkins J, et al. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2092–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:433–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill MJ, Royster GD, Healy MW, Richter KS, Levy G, DeCherney AH, et al. Are good patient and embryo characteristics protective against the negative effect of elevated progesterone level on the day of oocyte maturation? Fertil Steril. 2015:103, 1477–1484.e1-5.

  9. Labarta E, Martínez-Conejero JA, Alamá P, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C, et al. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1813–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lawrenz B, Fatemi HM. Effect of progesterone elevation in follicular phase of IVF-cycles on the endometrial receptivity. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34:422–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Castillo JLD, Bousamra M, Fuente LDL, Ruiz-Balda JA, Palomo M. The impact of serum progesterone levels on the results of in vitro fertilization treatments: a literature review. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015;19:141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu S, Shi L, Wang T, Shi J. Effect of low-dose dexamethasone on patients with elevated early follicular phase progesterone level and pregnancy outcomes in IVF-ET treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Endocrinol. 2018;895:771–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Listijono D, Kilani S, Tilia L, Garrett D, Chapman M. Is measurement of progesterone level prior to FSH stimulation useful in GnRH-antagonist cycles? Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015;18:234–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Huber PR, Nieschlag E, Holzgreve W. Progesterone serum levels during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle originate from the crosstalk between the ovaries and the adrenal cortex. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:933–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eldar-Geva T, Margalioth EJ, Brooks B, Algur N, Zylber-Haran E, Diamant YZ. The origin of serum progesterone during the follicular phase of menotropin-stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patton PE, Lim JY, Hickok LR, Kettel LM, Larson JM, Pau KYF. Precision of progesterone measurements with the use of automated immunoassay analyzers and the impact on clinical decisions for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1629–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nouvel M, Rabilloud M, Raverot V, Subtil F, Vouillarmet J, Thivolet C, et al. Performance of the 4-mg intravenous dexamethasone suppression test in differentiating Cushing disease from pseudo-Cushing syndrome. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2016;77:30–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conforti A, Marci R, Moustafa M, Tsibanakos I, Krishnamurthy G, Alviggi C, et al. Surgery and out-patient data collection and reporting using Filemaker Pro. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:2918–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sodano M, Bogliatto F, Morero S, Mosso L, Torchio B, Leidi L. Case report: successful IVF programme after conservatively treated endometrial cancer. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;18:578–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolibianakis EM, Zikopoulos K, Smitz J, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC, et al. Elevated progesterone at initiation of stimulation is associated with a lower ongoing pregnancy rate after IVF using GnRH antagonists. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1525–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Geyter C, Fehr P, Moffat R, Gruber IM, von Wolff M. Twenty years’ experience with the Swiss data registry for assisted reproductive medicine: outcomes, key trends and recommendations for improved practice. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14087.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Conforti A, Esteves SC, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Di Rella F, Ubaldi FM, et al. Management of women with an unexpected low ovarian response to gonadotropin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, et al. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24:614–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number), Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1452–3.

  26. Conforti A, Esteves SC, Picarelli S, Iorio G, Rania E, Zullo F, et al. Novel approaches for diagnosis and management of low prognosis patients in assisted reproductive technology: the POSEIDON concept. Panminerva Med. 2019;61:24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Esteves SC, Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Fischer R, Andersen CY, Conforti A, et al. The POSEIDON criteria and its measure of success through the eyes of clinicians and embryologists. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Esteves SC, Roque M, Bedoschi GM, Conforti A, Humaidan P, Alviggi C. Defining low prognosis patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology: POSEIDON criteria-the why. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Esteves SC, Roque M, Sunkara SK, Conforti A, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P, et al. Oocyte quantity, as well as oocyte quality, plays a significant role for the cumulative live birth rate of a POSEIDON criteria patient. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:2555–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Li X, Yang X, Cai S, Lu G, Lin G, et al. Cumulative live birth rates in low prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: an analysis of 26,697 cycles of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kyrou D, Al-Azemi M, Papanikolaou EG, Donoso P, Tziomalos K, Devroey P, et al. The relationship of premature progesterone rise with serum estradiol levels and number of follicles in GnRH antagonist/recombinant FSH-stimulated cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162:165–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Keck C, Neulen J, Breig-Lauel S, Breckwoldt M. Elevated serum progesterone concentrations during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle: clinical significance and therapeutic implications. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1999;13:161–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AC, SCE, CA, and MS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RS, FM, SM, and LC collected data and revised the manuscript. CA, SCE, and AP supervised the elaboration of the manuscript. All authors contributed to critical discussion and to final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Conforti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The present study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration principles. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The Institutional Review Board of the clinic approved the study.

Conflict of Interest

AC, SCE, and CA report personal fees and grants from Merck outside the submitted work. AP, RS, FM, LC, SM, and MS have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conforti, A., Esteves, S.C., Pellicer, A. et al. Effect of Dexamethasone Co-Treatment During Ovarian Stimulation in Women of Different Reproductive Age With Elevated Early Follicular Phase Progesterone Level: a Prospective Longitudinal Study. Reprod. Sci. 28, 3258–3264 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00590-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00590-7

Keyword

Navigation