Skip to main content
Log in

Segmentation of Mammography Breast Images Using Automatic SEGMEN Adversarial Network with UNET Neural Networks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast cancer is an extremely serious and lethal form of cancer. It is the second most common cancer among Indian women in rural areas. Early breast cancer detection can considerably enhance the effectiveness of treatment. Early detection of symptoms and signs is the most important technique to effectively treat breast cancer, as it enhances the odds of receiving an earlier, more specialist care. As a result, it has the possibility to significantly improve survival odds by delaying or entirely eliminating cancer. Mammography is a high-resolution radiography technique that is an important factor in avoiding and diagnosing cancer at an early stage. Automatic segmentation of the breast part using mammography pictures can help reduce the area available for cancer search, while also saving time and effort compared to manual segmentation. Previous studies have utilized convolutional and deconvolutional neural networks with autoencoder-like architecture (CN-DCNN) to perform automated breast region segmentation in mammography images. We present Automatic SegmenAN, an end-to-end unique adversarial neural network for the task of segmenting medical images, in this paper. Image segmentation necessitates extensive, pixel-level labeling, a standard GAN's discriminator's single scalar real/fake output may be inefficient in providing steady and appropriate gradient feedback for the networks. Our approach entails using a novel adversarial critic network and a multi-scale L1 loss function to prompt the critic and segmentor for acquiring local as well global features which encompass spatial relationships among pixels at both short and long ranges, instead of employing a segmentor which is a fully convolutional neural network. We demonstrate that an Automatic SegmenAN perspective is more up to date and reliable for segmentation tasks than any latest U-net segmentation technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(1):7–34.

  2. Klein EA, Richards D, Cohn A, Tummala M, Lapham R, Cosgrove D, Chung G, et al. Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(9):1167–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mittra I, Mishra GA, Dikshit RP, Gupta S, Kulkarni VY, Shaikh HK, Shastri SS, Hawaldar R, Gupta S, Pramesh CS and Badwe RA. Effect of screening by clinical breast examination on breast cancer incidence and mortality after 20 years: prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial in Mumbai. BMJ. 2021;372.

  4. Canelo-Aybar C, Posso M, Montero N, Sola I, Saz-Parkinson Z, Duffy SW, Follmann M, Grawingholt A, Giorgi Rossi P, Alonso-Coello P. Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Br J Cancer. 2022;126:673–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mashekova A, Zhao Y, Ng EY, Zarikas V, Fok SC, Mukhmetov O. Early detection of the breast cancer using infrared technology–a comprehensive review. Thermal Sci Eng Progr. 2022;27:101142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta KK, Vijay R, Pahadiya P, Saxena S. Use of novel thermography features of extraction and different artificial neural network algorithms in breast cancer screening. Wirel Pers Commun. 2022;1:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fujioka T, Katsuta L, Kubota K, Mori M, Kikuchi Y, Kato A, Oda G, Nakagawa T, Kitazume Y, Tateishi U. Classification of breast masses on ultrasound shear wave elastography using convolutional neural networks. Ultrason Imaging. 2020;42(4–5):213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Priyadharsini MS, Sathiaseelan JGR. The new robust adaptive median filter for denoising cancer images using image processing techniques. Indian J Sci Technol 2023;16(35).

  9. Punn NS, Agarwal S. RCA-IUnet: A residual cross-spatial attention guided inception U-Net model for tumor segmentation in breast ultrasound imaging. arXiv:2108.02508 (2021).

  10. Chaudhuri A. Hierarchical modified Fast R-CNN for object detection. Informatica. 2021;45(7):67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papadeas I, Tsochatzidis L, Amanatiadis A, Pratikakis I. Real-time semantic image segmentation with deep learning for autonomous driving: a survey. Appl Sci. 2021;11(19):8802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salama WM, Aly MH. Deep learning in mammography images segmentation and classification: automated CNN approach. Alex Eng J. 2021;60(5):4701–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rashmi R, Prasad K, Udupa CB. Breast histopathological image analysis using image processing techniques for diagnostic purposes: a methodological review. J Med Syst. 2022;46:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baccouche A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Castillo Olea C, Elmaghraby AS. Connected-UNets: a deep learning architecture for breast mass segmentation. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chukwu JK, Sani FB, and Nuhu AS. Breast cancer classification using deep convolutional neural networks. FUOYE J Eng Technol. 2021;6(2)

  16. Swain M, Kisan S, Chatterjee JM, Supramaniam M, Mohanty SN, Jhanjhi NZ, Abdullah A. Hybridized machine learning based fractal analysis techniques for breast cancer classification. Int J Adv Comp Sci Appl. 2020;11(10):179–84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nanglia S, Ahmad M, Khan FA, Jhanjhi NZ. An enhanced Predictive heterogeneous ensemble model for breast cancer prediction. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022;72:103279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Dhabyani W, Gomaa M, Khaled H, Aly F. Deep learning approaches for data augmentation and classification of breast masses using ultrasound images. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2019;10(5):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saber A, Sakr M, Abo-Seida OM, Keshk A, Chen H. A novel deep-learning model for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer using the transfer-learning technique. IEEE Access. 2021;9:71194–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Suriya Priyadharsini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. On behalf of all co-authors, the corresponding author shall bear full responsibility for the submission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Industrial IoT and Cyber-Physical Systems” guest edited by Arun K Somani, Seeram Ramakrishnan, Anil Chaudhary and Mehul Mahrishi.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Priyadharsini, M.S., Sathiaseelan, J.G.R. Segmentation of Mammography Breast Images Using Automatic SEGMEN Adversarial Network with UNET Neural Networks. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 118 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02422-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02422-8

Keywords

Navigation