Skip to main content
Log in

A generalized Agresti–Coull type confidence interval for a binomial proportion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the fundamental topics in statistical inference is constructing a confidence interval for a binomial proportion p. It is well known that commonly used asymptotic confidence intervals, such as the Wilson and Agresti–Coull confidence intervals, suffer from systematic bias and oscillations in their coverage probabilities. We generalize asymptotic confidence intervals, including the Wald, Wilson and Agresti–Coull intervals, and propose a generalized Agresti–Coull type confidence interval by adjusting the bias with the saddlepoint approximation. We compare the coverage probabilities and lengths of the proposed confidence interval with those of other popular asymptotic confidence intervals. We show that the proposed confidence interval is more stable than the Wilson interval at the boundaries of p and has a shorter length than the Agresti–Coull interval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A., & Coull, B. A. (1998). Approximate is better than exact for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, 52(2), 119–126.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & DasGupta, A. (2001). Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science, 16(2), 101–117.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & DasGupta, A. (2002). Confidence intervals for binomial proportion and asymptotic expansions. The Annals of Statistics, 30(1), 160–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, T. T. (2005). One-sided confidence intervals in discrete distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 131(1), 63–88.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clopper, C. J., & Pearson, E. S. (1998). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26, 403–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. M. (2016). Binomial and multinomial proportions: accurate estimation and reliable assessment of accuracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.00207.

  • Guan, Y. (2012). A generalized score confidence interval for a binomial proportion. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 142, 785–793.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, S., Thulin, M., & Larsson, R. (2017). Approximate Bayesianity of frequentist confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. The Americans Statistician, 71(2), 106–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. C. (2006). Interval estimation of binomial proportions based on weighted Polya posterior. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 1012–1021.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lugannani, R., & Rice, S. (1980). Saddle point approximation for the distribution of the sum of independent random variables. Advances in Applied Probability, 12(2), 475–490.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22(158), 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X. (1998). Better saddlepoint confidence intervals via bootstrap calibration. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 126(12), 3669–3679.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junsik Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 130 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Jang, W. A generalized Agresti–Coull type confidence interval for a binomial proportion. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 51, 356–377 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-021-00143-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-021-00143-3

Keywords

Navigation