Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Photo-Fenton-inspired deoxygenation of tea polyphenol–graphene by household bleach

  • Rapid Communications
  • Published:
Carbon Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A liquid-phase exfoliation of few-layer graphene in tea is considered as one of the alternative approaches for the preparation of environment-friendly graphene. However, the removal of chemically adsorbed tea-polyphenols from graphene is known to be difficult and the application of centrifugation or filtration alone for the purification of graphene against tea-polyphenols is regarded to be almost technically impossible. Notably, a strategy for facile deoxygenation of tea-graphene must be established for a green and economical production of graphene to be realized. In this work, a simple purification method of graphene through the application of merely a household bleach (Clorox®) after the pre-exfoliation in black tea has been proposed. It has been found that the carbon–oxygen (C/O) value for graphene increases from 2.7 to 8.1 while the values of C–OH, C–O–C and C=O region in the C1s spectrum of graphene decrease significantly after being purified in bleach for 5 h. The stretching and shift of C–OH, C=O and C–O–C at 3468 cm−1, 1637 cm−1 and 1008 cm−1 from IR spectrum of purified graphene seems to be in agreement with the produced data from the XPS and Raman spectroscopy. Despite the enhanced ID/IG of Raman from the hybridization of sp2 by hydroxylation, the deoxygenation of tea-graphene does not negatively affect the electrical performance since the sheet resistance was impressively reduced to 193 Ω from 2.1 kΩ. It is believed that this photo-Fenton-inspired purification strategy would assist in the washing issue of polyphenol-stabilized graphene for various future electronic applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Young RJ, Liu M, Kinloch IA, Li S, Zhao X, Vallés C, Papageorgiou DG (2018) The mechanics of reinforcement of polymers by graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol 154:110–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolotin KI, Sikes KJ, Jiang Z, Klima M, Fudenberg G, Hone J, Kim P, Stormer H (2008) Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene. Solid State Commun 146:351–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin G, Yan Q-B, Qin Z, Yue S-Y, Hu M, Su G (2015) Anisotropic intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity of phosphorene from first principles. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:4854–4858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Casaluci S, Gemmi M, Pellegrini V, Di Carlo A, Bonaccorso F (2016) Graphene-based large area dye-sensitized solar cell modules. Nanoscale 8:5368–5378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly AG, Finn D, Harvey A, Hallam T, Coleman JN (2016) All-printed capacitors from graphene-BN-graphene nanosheet heterostructures. Appl Phys Lett 109:023107

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu K, Wang Y, Yan C, Yao Y, Chen Y, Dai J, Lacey S, Wang Y, Wan J, Li T (2016) Graphene oxide-based electrode inks for 3D-printed lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 28:2587–2594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin H, Sharma BK, Lee SW, Lee J-B, Choi M, Hu L, Park C, Choi JH, Kim TW, Ahn J-H (2019) Stretchable electroluminescent display enabled by graphene-based hybrid electrode. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:14222–14228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li X, Colombo L, Ruoff RS (2016) Synthesis of graphene films on copper foils by chemical vapor deposition. Adv Mater 28:6247–6252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yazdi G, Iakimov T, Yakimova R (2016) Epitaxial graphene on SiC: a review of growth and characterization. Crystals 6:53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Teng C, Xie D, Wang J, Yang Z, Ren G, Zhu Y (2017) Ultrahigh conductive graphene paper based on ball-milling exfoliated graphene. Adv Func Mater 27:1700240

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guex LG, Sacchi B, Peuvot KF, Andersson RL, Pourrahimi AM, Ström V, Farris S, Olsson RT (2017) Experimental review: chemical reduction of graphene oxide (GO) to reduced graphene oxide (rGO) by aqueous chemistry. Nanoscale 9:9562–9571

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Z, Jin H, Miao X, Ju T, Li Y, Ji J (2019) Gas-driven exfoliation for producing high-quality graphene. Chem Commun 55:7749–7751. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC03159F

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadi A, Zahirifar J, Karimi-Sabet J, Dastbaz A (2018) Graphene nanosheets preparation using magnetic nanoparticle assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphite: the coupled effect of ultrasound and wedging nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem 44:204–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly AG, Vega-Mayoral V, Boland JB, Coleman JN (2019) Whiskey-phase exfoliation: exfoliation and printing of nanosheets using Irish whiskey. 2D Materials 6:045036

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rizvi R, Nguyen EP, Kowal MD, Mak WH, Rasel S, Islam MA, Abdelaal A, Joshi AS, Zekriardehani S, Coleman MR (2018) High-throughput continuous production of shear-exfoliated 2D layered materials using compressible flows. Adv Mater 30:1800200

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang K, Tang J, Yuan J, Li J, Sun Y, Matsuba Y, Zhu D-M, Qin L-C (2018) Production of few-layer graphene via enhanced high-pressure shear exfoliation in liquid for supercapacitor applications. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:2877–2884

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang W, Gai Y, Song N, Xiao D, Tan H, Zhao Y (2018) Highly efficient production of graphene by an ultrasound coupled with a shear mixer in supercritical CO2. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:16701–16708

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Varrla E, Paton KR, Backes C, Harvey A, Smith RJ, McCauley J, Coleman JN (2014) Turbulence-assisted shear exfoliation of graphene using household detergent and a kitchen blender. Nanoscale 6:11810–11819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhuo H, Zhang X, Wang L, Lu Q, Kaplan DL (2018) Sonication exfoliation of defect-free graphene in aqueous silk nanofiber solutions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:12261–12267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ismail Z, Abdullah AH, Abidin ASZ, Yusoh K (2017) Production of functional graphene by kitchen mixer: mechanism and metric development for in situ measurement of sheet size. J Nanostruct Chem 7:231–242

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ismail Z, Kassim NFA, Abdullah AH, Abidin ASZ, Ismail FS, Yusoh K (2017) Black tea assisted exfoliation using a kitchen mixer allowing one-step production of graphene. Mater Res Express 4:075607

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu H, Li Y, Dai K, Zheng G, Liu C, Shen C, Yan X, Guo J, Guo Z (2016) Electrically conductive thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites at ultralow graphene loading levels for strain sensor applications. J Mater Chem C 4:157–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. da Silva Burgal J, Peeva L, Livingston A (2016) Towards improved membrane production: using low-toxicity solvents for the preparation of PEEK nanofiltration membranes. Green Chem 18:2374–2384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. George G, Sisupal SB, Tomy T, Kumaran A, Vadivelu P, Suvekbala V, Sivaram S, Ragupathy L (2018) Facile, environmentally benign and scalable approach to produce pristine few layers graphene suitable for preparing biocompatible polymer nanocomposites. Sci Rep 8:11228

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abdullah AH, Ismail Z, Abidin ASZ, Yusoh K (2019) Green sonochemical synthesis of few-layer graphene in instant coffee. Mater Chem Phys 222:11–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu L, Qing M, Wang Y, Chen S (2015) Defects in graphene: generation, healing, and their effects on the properties of graphene: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 31:599–606

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. González-Domínguez JM, León V, Lucío MI, Prato M, Vázquez E (2018) Production of ready-to-use few-layer graphene in aqueous suspensions. Nat Protoc 13:495

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Shi Z, Yin J (2011) Facile synthesis of soluble graphene via a green reduction of graphene oxide in tea solution and its biocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1127–1133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paton KR, Varrla E, Backes C, Smith RJ, Khan U, O’Neill A, Boland C, Lotya M, Istrate OM, King P (2014) Scalable production of large quantities of defect-free few-layer graphene by shear exfoliation in liquids. Nat Mater 13:624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ricardo KB, Sendecki A, Liu H (2014) Surfactant-free exfoliation of graphite in aqueous solutions. Chem Commun 50:2751–2754

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdolhosseinzadeh S, Asgharzadeh H, Kim HS (2015) Fast and fully-scalable synthesis of reduced graphene oxide. Sci Rep 5:10160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bai H, Jiang W, Kotchey GP, Saidi WA, Bythell BJ, Jarvis JM, Marshall AG, Robinson RA, Star A (2014) Insight into the mechanism of graphene oxide degradation via the photo-Fenton reaction. J Phys Chem C 118:10519–10529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li W, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Sun M, Cheng R, Xu X, Chen Y, Mo Y (2005) Effect of hydroxyl radical on the structure of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Synth Met 155:509–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chabot V, Kim B, Sloper B, Tzoganakis C, Yu A (2013) High yield production and purification of few layer graphene by Gum Arabic assisted physical sonication. Sci Rep 3:1378

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hou W-C, Chowdhury I, Goodwin DG Jr, Henderson WM, Fairbrother DH, Bouchard D, Zepp RG (2015) Photochemical transformation of graphene oxide in sunlight. Environ Sci Technol 49:3435–3443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang M, Deng Y, Yang M, Nakajima H, Yudasaka M, Iijima S, Okazaki T (2019) A simple method for removal of carbon nanotubes from wastewater using hypochlorite. Sci Rep 9:1284

    Google Scholar 

  37. Newman L, Lozano N, Zhang M, Iijima S, Yudasaka M, Bussy C, Kostarelos K (2017) Hypochlorite degrades 2D graphene oxide sheets faster than 1D oxidised carbon nanotubes and nanohorns. npj 2D Mater Appl 1:39

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou X, Guo S, Zhong P, Xie Y, Li Z, Ma X (2016) Large scale production of graphene quantum dots through the reaction of graphene oxide with sodium hypochlorite. RSC Adv 6:54644–54648

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Meng X, Li M, Kang Z, Zhang X, Xiao J (2013) Mechanics of self-folding of single-layer graphene. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:055308

    Google Scholar 

  40. Coleman JN (2012) Liquid exfoliation of defect-free graphene. Acc Chem Res 46:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ismail Z (2019) Layer–layer assembly of water-based graphene for facile fabrication of sensitive strain gauges on paper. Cellulose 26:1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohan VB, Brown R, Jayaraman K, Bhattacharyya D (2015) Characterisation of reduced graphene oxide: effects of reduction variables on electrical conductivity. Mater Sci Eng B 193:49–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges CARIFF (UMP) and ITMA (UPM) for assistance with TEM, XPS and Raman characterization of graphene. There is no financial support to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zulhelmi Ismail.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ismail, Z. Photo-Fenton-inspired deoxygenation of tea polyphenol–graphene by household bleach. Carbon Lett. 30, 449–456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00114-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00114-z

Keywords

Navigation