Skip to main content
Log in

Log-Burr XII Gamma–Weibull Regression Model with Random Effects and Censored Data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It may happen in some applications that the assumption of independence of survival times does not hold. Thus, we propose a new log-Burr XII regression model with log-gamma–Weibull distributions for the random effects. The maximum likelihood method is used to estimate the model parameters based on the Gauss–Hermite numerical integration technique. For different parameter settings, sample sizes, censoring percentages and correlated data, various simulations are performed. Some global-influence measurements are also investigated. In order to assess the robustness of the maximum likelihood estimators, we evaluate local influence on the estimates of the parameters under different perturbation schemes. We illustrate the importance of the new model by means of a real data set in analysis of experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahantes JC, Burzykowski T (1977) A version of the EM algorithm for proportional hazard model with random effects. Biom J 47:847–862

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonat WH, Krainski ET, Ribeiro JR, P.J Zeviani WM (2012) Métodos computacional em inferência estatística. Região Brasileira da Sociedade Internacional de Biometria, Piracicaba

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colosimo EA, Giolo SR (2006) Análise de sobrevivência aplicada. Edgard Blücher, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19:15–18

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook RD (1986) Assessment of local influence (with discussion). J R Stat Soc 48:133–169

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. da Cruz JN, Ortega EMM, Cordeiro GM (2016) The log-odd log-logistic Weibull regression model: modelling, estimation, influence diagnostics and residual analysis. J Stat Comput Simul 86:1516–1538

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Elghafghuf A, Stryhn H (2016) Correlated versus uncorrelated frailty Cox models: a comparison of different estimation procedures. Biom J 58:1198–1216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Davison AC, Tsai CL (1992) Regression model diagnostics. Int Stat Rev 60:337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fabio LZ, Paula GA, de Castro M (2012) A Poisson mixed model with nonnormal random effects distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:1499–1510

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hashimoto EM, Cordeiro GM, Ortega EMM, Hamedani GG (2016) New flexible regression models generated by gamma random variables with censored data. Int J Stat Probab 5:9–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hedeker D, Siddiqui O, Hu FB (2000) Random-effects regression analysis of correlated grouped-time survival data. Stat Methods Med Res 9:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalbfleish JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Keiding N, Andersen PK, Klein JP (1997) The role of frailty models and accelerated failure time models in describing heterogeneity due to omitted covariates. Stat Med 16:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein JP, Pelz C, Zhang M (1999) Modelling random effects for censored data by a multivariate normal regression model. Biometrics 55:497–506

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lambert P, Collet D, Kimber A, Johnson R (2004) Parametric accelerated failure time models with random effects and an application to kidney transplant survival. Stat Med 23:3177–3192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lesaffre E, Verbeke G (1998) Local influence in linear mixed models. Biometrics 54:570–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu L, Huang X (2007) The use of Gaussian quadrature for estimation in frailty proportional hazards models. Stat Med 27:2665–2683

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Massuia MB, Cabral CRB, Matos LA, Lachos VH (2014) Influence diagnostics for Student-t censored linear regression models. Statistics 49:1–21

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris C, Christiansen C (1995) Fitting Weibull duration models with random effects. Lifetime Data Anal 1:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nadarajah S, Cordeiro GM, Ortega EMM (2015) The Zografos–Balakrishnan-G family of distributions: mathematical properties and applications. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44:186–215

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortega EMM, Cordeiro GM, Campelo AK, Kattan MW, Cancho VG (2015) A power series beta Weibull regression model for predicting breast carcinoma. Stat Med 34:1366–1388

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ortega EMM, Cordeiro GM, Hashimoto EM, Suzuki AK (2017) Regression models generated by gamma random variables with long-term survivors. Commun Stat Appl Methods 24:43–65

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ristic MM, Balakrishnan N (2012) The gamma exponentiated exponential distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 82:1191–1206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva GO, Ortega EMM, Cancho VG, Barreto ML (2008) Log-Burr XII regression models with censored data. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:3820–3842

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaida F, Xu R (2000) Proportional hazards model with random effects. Stat Med 19:3309–3324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie F, Wei B (2007) Diagnostics analysis for log-Birnbaum–Saunders regression models. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:4692–4706

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanegas LH, Paula GA (2017) Log-symmetric regression models under the presence of non-informative left or right censored observations. Test 26:405–428

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Yiqi B, Russo CM, Cancho VG, Louzada F (2015) Influence diagnostics for the Weibull-Negative-Binomial regression model with cure rate under latent failure causes. J Appl Stat 43:1027–1060

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang D, Davidian M (2001) Linear mixed models with flexible distributions of random effects for longitudinal data. Biometrics 57:795–802

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmer WJ, Keats JB, Wang FK (1998) The Burr XII distribution in reliability analysis. J Q Technol 30:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zografos K, Balakrishnan N (2009) On families of beta- and generalized gamma-generated distributions and associated inference. Stat Methodol 6:344–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two referees, the Associate Editor and the Editor for all their suggestions and comments to improve the manuscript. This study was funded by the Foundation for State of São Paulo (FAPESP) (Process No 2010/04496-2) and CNPq, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin M. M. Ortega.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashimoto, E.M., Silva, G.O., Ortega, E.M.M. et al. Log-Burr XII Gamma–Weibull Regression Model with Random Effects and Censored Data. J Stat Theory Pract 13, 27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-018-0026-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-018-0026-3

Keywords

Navigation