Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Policy of Pitch-Hold Phase for Mine Detection of UAV Based on Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An optimization problem is formulated to maximize the coverage of the detection area for a fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), which performs a landmine detection mission. The UAV has mine detection devices including magnetic field sensors and chemical sensors. Due to the characteristics of the detection sensors, the UAV should fly at a certain altitude above the ground while following the terrain to perform accurate mine detection. Also, the UAV is required to maintain the pitch angle around the trim value when changing the altitude. Consequently, the altitude change rate of the UAV is limited during the mission. To maximize the mine detection capability within the limit, in this study, the entire flight interval is divided into the intervals on which the mines can be detected accurately and the intervals on which accurate detection is not possible. Logical variables are introduced to indicate the satisfaction of the requirements for accurate detection. Constraints on the logical variables are transformed into a set of linear inequalities containing continuous variables and binary integer variables. Finally, the optimization problem is formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming problem. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through numerical simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bemporad A, Morari M (1999) Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints. Automatica 35(3):407–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00178-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Colorado J, Perez M, Mondragon I, Mendez D, Parra C, Devia C, Marinez-Moritz J, Neira L (2017) An integrated aerial system for landmine detection: SDR-based ground penetrating radar onboard an autonomous drone. Adv Robot 31(15):791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.135139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colorado J, Mondragon I, Rodriguez J, Castiblanco C (2015) Geo-mapping and visual stitching to support landmine detection using a low-cost UAV. Int J Adv Robot Syst 12(9):125. https://doi.org/10.5772/61236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernández MG, López YÁ, Arboleya AA, Valdés BG, Vaqueiro YR, Andrés FLH, García AP (2018) Synthetic aperture radar imaging system for landmine detection using a ground penetrating radar on board a unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Access 6:45100–45112. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2863572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grant M, Boyd S (2014) CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1. CVX Research. http://cvxr.com/cvx. Accessed 26 Aug 2021

  6. Gurobi Optimization, LLC (2021) Gurobi Optimizer reference Manual. Gurobi Optimization. https://www.gurobi.com. Accessed 26 Aug 2021

  7. Kang H, Lee S, Lee J, Kim Y, Suk J, Kim S (2021) Altitude tracking of UAV with pitch-hold constraint based on model predictive control for mine detection. In: 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Jeju, Korea, 12–15 October 2021. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICCAS52745.2021.9649884

  8. Kamyar R, Taheri E (2014) Aircraft optimal terrain/threat-based trajectory planning and control. J Guid Control Dyn 37(2):466–483. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.61339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Livshitz A, Idan M (2018) Low-cost laser range-measurement-based terrain-following concept and error analysis. J Guid Control Dyn 41(4):1006–1014. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Livshitz A, Idan M (2019) Preview control approach for laser-range-finder-based terrain following. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 56(2):1318–1331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2019.2933955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu P, Pierson BL (1995) Optimal aircraft terrain-following analysis and trajectory generation. J Guid Control Dyn 18(3):555–560. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu P, Pierson BL (1995) Aircraft terrain following based on a nonlinear continuous predictive control approach. J Guid Control Dyn 18(4):817–823. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malaek S, Abbasi A (2011) Near-optimal terrain collision avoidance trajectories using elevation maps. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 47(4):2490–2501. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2006.1656012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malaek S, Kosari A (2007) Novel minimum time trajectory planning in terrain following flights. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 43(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2007.357150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Menon PKA, Kim E, Cheng VHL (1991) Optimal trajectory synthesis for terrain-following flight. J Guid Control Dyn 14(4):807–813. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20716

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2021) National spatial data infrastructure portal. http://www.nsdi.go.kr. Accessed 26 Aug 2021

  17. Samar R, Rehman A (2011) Autonomous terrain-following for unmanned air vehicles. Mechatron 21(5):844–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams P (2005) Aircraft trajectory planning for terrain following incorporating actuator constraints. J Aircr 42(5):1358–1361. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.17811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams P (2007) Three-dimensional aircraft terrain-following via real-time optimal control. J Guid Control Dyn 30(4):1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.29145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoo L, Lee J, Lee Y, Jung S, Choi Y (2021) Application of a drone magnetometer system to military mine detection in the demilitarized zone. Sensor 21(9):3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Defense Challengeable Future Technology Program of the Agency for Defense Development, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youdan Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

An earlier version of this paper was presented at APISAT 2021, Jeju, South Korea, in November 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S., Kang, H., Lee, J. et al. Optimal Policy of Pitch-Hold Phase for Mine Detection of UAV Based on Mixed-Integer Linear Programming. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 23, 746–754 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-022-00454-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-022-00454-7

Keywords

Navigation