Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Study of Hypervelocity Impact Characteristics in Aluminum Whipple Shielding Through 3D Measurement and Numerical Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypervelocity impact research is key to the designing of shielding systems to protect structures in low earth orbit with risk of space debris impact. Understanding the physical features contributes to the effective development of impact shielding design. In this study, the impact hole area, lip height, and debris cloud impact radius were investigated for impacts up to around 4 km/s for 6061-T6 aluminum panels of 3 mm thickness using a 2-stage light gas gun. Image analysis and 3D scanning were employed to measure the geometric features. Numerical analysis was conducted to simulate the experiment cases and the modeling was verified through comparison of the geometric features. The hole area and debris cloud impact radius showed gradually increasing trends with increasing impact velocity. The 3D scan measurements followed the image analysis, and considering the overall similarity between the 3D scan and numerical simulation, the numerical model satisfactorily reproduced and supported the experimental measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drolshagen G (2001) Hypervelocity impact effects on spacecraft. In: Warmbein B (ed) Proceedings of the Meteoroids 2001 Conference, 6–10 August 2001, Kiruna, Sweden. ESA SP-495, Noordwijk: ESA Publications Division, pp 533–541

  2. Weeden B (2009) 2009 Iridium-Cosmos collision fact sheet. Secure World Foundation. Updated November 10, 2010

  3. Limiting future collision risk to spacecraft: An assessment of NASA’s meteoroid and orbital debris programs. Committee for the Assessment of NASA’s Orbital Debris Programs, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, The National Academies Press, 2011

  4. Christiansen EL (1993) Design and performance equations for advanced meteoroid and debris shields. Int J Impact Eng 14(1–4):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehrholz D, Leushacke L, Flury W, Jehn R, Klinkrad H, Landgraf M (2002) Detecting, tracking and imaging space debris. ESA Bulletin 109

  6. Africano JL, Stansbery EG, Kervin PW (2004) The optical orbital debris measurement program at NASA and AMOS. Adv Space Res 34(5):892–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cour-Palais BG (1987) Hypervelocity impact in metals, glass and composites. Int J Impact Eng 5(1–4):221–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clegg RA, White DM, Riedel W, Harwick W (2006) Hypervelocity impact damage prediction in composites: part I—material model and characterisation. Int J Impact Eng 33(1–12):190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murr LE, Quinones SA, Ferreyra TE, Ayala A, Valerio OL, Hörz F, Bernhard RP (1998) The low velocity-to-hypervelocity penetration transition for impact craters in metal targets. Mater Sci Eng, A 256(1–2):166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. See T, Albrooks M, Atkinson D, Simon C (1990) Meteoroid and debris impact features documented on the long duration exposure facility. DTIC Document

  11. Baluch AH, Park Y, Kim CG (2013) Hypervelocity impact on carbon/epoxy composites in low Earth orbit environment. Compos Struct 96:554–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Drolshagen G (2008) Impact effects from small size meteoroids and space debris. Adv Space Res 41(7):1123–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christiansen EL, Hyde JL, Bernhard RP (2004) Space shuttle debris and meteoroid impacts. Adv Space Res 34(5):1097–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cour-Palais BG, Crews JL (1990) A multi-shock concept for spacecraft shielding. Int J Impact Eng 10(1–4):135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang P, Youn S-K, Lim JH (2013) Modification of the critical projectile diameter of honeycomb sandwich panel considering the channeling effect in hypervelocity impact. Aerosp Sci Technol 29(1):412–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gehring Jr JW (1990) Chapter IV—Theory of impact on thin targets and shields and correlation with experiment, high-velocity impact phenomena. Elsevier, Academic Press, 1970//W.P. Schonberg, Hypervelocity Impact Penetration Phenomena in Aluminum Space Structures. J Aerosp Eng 3(3)

  17. Rolsten RF, Wellnitz JN, Hunt HH (1964) An example of hole diameter in thin plates due to hypervelocity impact. J Appl Phys 35:556–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schonberg WP, Williamsen JE (1997) Empirical hole size and crack length models for dual-wall systems under hypervelocity projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng 20:711–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mespoulet J, Hereil P-L, Abdulhamid H, Deconinck P, Puillet C (2017) Experimental study of hypervelocity impacts on space shields above 8 km/s. In: The 14th Hypervelocity Impact Symposium 2017, Canterbury, Kent, UK, 24–28 April 2017

  20. Ting W (2006) The consequences of using kinetic energy anti-satellite weapons. In: International network of engineers and scientists against proliferation, INESAP Information Bulletin No. 26, June 2006

  21. Pardini C, Anselmo L (2000) SDIRAT: Introducing a new method for orbital debris collision risk assessment. In: International Symposium on Space Dynamics, Biarritz, France, 26–30 June 2000, pp 1–9

  22. Schonberg WP (2016) Comment on the reimerdes ballistic limit equation for dual-wall structural systems. J Spacecr Rockets 53(3):584–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucy LB (1977) A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J 82:1013–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 181(3):375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pascal M, Heilig G, Lueck M, Sauer M (2015) Simulation and experiments of hypervelocity impact in containers with fluid and granular fillings. The 13th Hypervelocity Impact Symposium. Procedia Eng 103:365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim Y, Yoo J, Lee M (2012) Optimal design of spaced plates under hypervelocity impact. J Mech Sci Technol 26(5):1567–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maiden CJ (1963) Investigation of fundamental mechanism of damage to thin targets by hypervelocity projectiles. GM Defense Research Laboratories

  28. John WG (1970) Chapter IV—Theory of impact on thin targets and shields and correlation with experiment. In: Kinslow R (ed) High-velocity impact phenomena. Academic Press, pp 105–156

  29. Jonathan MM (2013) Investigation of hypervelocity impact phenomena using real-time concurrent diagnostics. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Jaehong Ahn and graduate student Jin Seok Hong of the Digital Heritage Lab, KAIST Graduate School of Culture Technology for aiding in the use of the 3D scanning equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aerospace Engineering, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Republic of Korea

    Yurim Park, Changkyo Shin & Chun-Gon Kim

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241, Republic of Korea

    YunHo Kim

Authors
  1. Yurim Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. YunHo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Changkyo Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chun-Gon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Gon Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, Y., Kim, Y., Shin, C. et al. A Comparative Study of Hypervelocity Impact Characteristics in Aluminum Whipple Shielding Through 3D Measurement and Numerical Analysis. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 22, 1356–1364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00398-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00398-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation