Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forest School practice in Canada: a survey study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade, interest in nature-based educational programs has been growing in Canada, yet there has been little research on the nature of these programs and how they are being implemented. This small-scale study provides baseline information on the characteristics of Canadian Forest Schools, the challenges that educators face in starting up these outdoor programs, and the potential benefits for enrolled children. An online survey study was conducted in the fall of 2017, to which 25 Forest School educators from across Canada responded. Results suggest that Canadian Forest School programs vary in terms of size, age of the children, type of outdoor setting, funding source, and schedule. Participants reported facing challenges such as finding an appropriate outdoor site, safety concerns related to outdoor activities, and the lack of support from different stakeholders. Many of these barriers were surmounted by developing relationships with local partners, adapting programs to comply with local regulations, and educating the community on Forest School pedagogy. In line with the growing international body of research on the benefits of Forest School (e.g., Elliott & Chancellor, 2014; Müller et al., 2017; Murray & O’Brien, 2005; Slade, Lowery & Bland, 2013), Canadian Forest School educators have observed benefits for the children, including the development of their social and physical skills and self-confidence, increased appreciation for nature, and enhanced creativity. Further research is needed to fully capture and examine this growing practice in the Canadian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors have chosen to capitalize both words in the term “Forest School” for this article, but we acknowledge that there are currently variations on terminology used by Canadian practitioners and researchers.

  2. Forest School Canada is an educational initiative of the Child and Nature Alliance of Canada.

References

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, J., & Wilde, A. (2019). Exploring practitioners’ perceptions of risk when delivering Forest School for 3- to 5-year-old children. International Journal of Play, 8(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child and Nature Alliance of Canada. (2019). Forest and Nature School in Canada. Retrieved from http://childnature.ca/about-forest-and-nature-school/

  • Coates, J. K., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2019). Learning while playing: Children’s Forest School experiences in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., & Haughton, C. (2015). The perception, management and performance of risk amongst Forest School educators. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1073098.

  • Constable, K. (2014). Bringing the Forest School approach to your early years practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, F., & Nash, M. (2015). An Australian perspective of a Forest School: Shaping a sense of place to support learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15(4), 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, S. (2019). Seeing the forest and the trees: A historical and conceptual look at Danish Forest Schools. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(3), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, E., Eycke, K. T., Chan, S., & Müller, U. (2014). Taking kindergartners outdoors: Documenting their explorations and assessing the impact on their ecological awareness. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 102–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, E., & Krusekopf, F. (2017). Thinking outside the four walls of the classroom: A Canadian nature kindergarten. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49, 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0203-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S., & Chancellor, B. (2014). From forest preschool to bush kinder: An inspirational approach to preschool provision in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friendly, M., & Prentice, S. (2012). Provision, policy, and politics in early childhood education and care in Canada. In N. Howe & L. Prochner (Eds.), Recent perspectives on early childhood education and care in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D., & Collier, D. R. (2017). The matter of the stick: Storying/(re)storying children’s literacies in the forest. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417712340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D., Reichheld, S., McElhone, S., & McKinlay, B. (2017). ‘I can climb the tree!’ Exploring young children’s play and physical activity in a Forest School program. The International Journal of Holistic Early Childhood Learning and Development, 4, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyland, T., & Elliot, E. (2014). Nature kindergarten in Sooke: A unique collaboration. Canadian Children, 39(2), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugick, L., & Best, J. (2008). Questionnaire length. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 660–660). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n426.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janes, J. (2001). Survey research design. Library Hi Tech, 19(4), 419–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2009). Forest schools and outdoor play in the early years. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2016). Forest School in practice. London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2018). Translating Forest School: A response to Leather. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0010-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather, M. (2018). A critique of “Forest School” or something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A., Truong, S., & Gray, T. (2018). Place-based outdoor learning: More than a drag and drop approach. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0002-5.

  • Lysklett, O. B., & Berger, H. W. (2017). What are the characteristics of nature preschools in Norway, and how do they organize their daily activities? Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(2), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, Z. (2013). The Canadian Forest School movement. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(1), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, Z. (2018). First nation pedagogical emphasis on imitation and making the stuff of life: Canadian lessons for indigenizing Forest schools. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0003-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, E., Todd, E., Cooksey, E., Dredge, S., Jones, H., Reynolds, D., et al. (2019) Curriculum-based outdoor learning for children aged 9-11: A qualitative analysis of pupils’ and teachers’ views. PLOS ONE 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212242.

  • Maynard, T. (2007). Encounters with Forest School and Foucault: A risky business? Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 35(4), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, E. (2015). “The freedom to choose”: Neoliberalism, feminism, and childcare in Canada. Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 37(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, U., Temple, V. A., Smith, B., Kerns, K., Ten Eycke, K., Crane, J., & Sheehan, J. (2017). Effects of nature kindergarten attendance on children’s functioning. Children, Youth and Environments, 27(2), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2003). Forest scrhool evaluation project: A study in Wales. New Economics Foundation. Retrieved from http://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Measuring_Progress_and_Eco_Footprinting/ForestSchoolsEvaluation.pdf.

  • Murray, R., & O’Brien, L. (2005). ‘Such enthusiasm–a joy to see’: An evaluation of Forest School in England. New Economics Foundation and Forest research. Retrieved from http://www.forestry.gov.uk/.

  • Nelson, N., Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2018). Rethinking nature-based approaches in early childhood education: Common worlding practices. Journal of Childhood Studies, 43(1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American Association for Environmental Education. (2017). Nature preschools and forest kindergartens 2017 national survey. Washington, DC: NAAEE. Retrieved from http://naturalstart.org/sites/default/files/staff/nature_preschools_national_survey_2017.pdf.

  • O’Brien, L. (2009). Learning outdoors: The Forest School approach. Education 3–13, 37(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ParticipACTION. (2015). The biggest risk is keeping kids indoors: The 2015 ParticipACTION report card on physical activity for children and youth. Retrieved from https://participaction.cdn.prismic.io/participaction%2F61cf55e8-c1c0-42c7-ba6b-1480fd2c29b9_participaction-2015-report-card-full.pdf.

  • Pickles, C. (n.d.). Outdoor play in child care settings: Recommendations for child care licensing in Alberta. Retrieved from https://getoutsideandplay.ca/licensing-regulation-project/.

  • Power, M. (2016). It’s okay to let kids play: Forest and nature school, risky play, and early learning. Interaction, 30(1), 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgers, N. D., Knowles, Z. R., & Sayers, J. (2012). Encouraging play in the natural environment: A child-focused case study of Forest School. Children’s Geographies, 10(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The restorative outcomes of Forest School and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(3), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma-Brymer, V., Brymer, E., Gray, T., & Davids, K. (2018). Affordances guiding Forest School practice: The application of the ecological dynamics approach. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 103–115 10.1007/s42322-017-0004-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M., Lowery, C., & Bland, K. (2013). Evaluating the impact of Forest Schools: A collaboration between a university and a primary school. Support for Learning, 28(2), 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. A., Dunhill, A., & Scott, G. W. (2018). Fostering children’s relationship with nature: Exploring the potential of Forest School. Education 3–13, 46(5), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2017.1298644.

  • Sobel, D. (2016). Nature preschools and forest kindergartens: The handbook for outdoor learning. St Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M. (2018). Posthuman theory and practice in early years learning. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature (pp. 1–25). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_33-1.

  • Swarbrick, N., Eastwood, G., & Tutton, K. (2004). Self-esteem and successful interaction as part of the Forest School project. Support for Learning, 19(3), 142–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trobia, A. (2008). Questionnaire. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 653–655). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n424.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turtle, C., Convery, I., & Convery, K. (2015). Forest schools and environmental attitudes: A case study of children aged 8–11 years. Cogent Education, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1100103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle, M. (2010). Come rain or Shine: A whole school approach to Forest School. FORUM: For Promoting 3–19 Comprehensive Education, 52(1), 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, S., & Goodenough, A. (2018). What is different about Forest School? Creating a space for an alternative pedagogy in England. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0005-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Department of Children, Youth & Families. (n.d.). Outdoor preschool pilot. Retrieved from https://www.dcyf.wa.gov/about/government-community/advisory/opp.

  • Williams-Siegfredsen, J. (2017). Understanding the Danish Forest School approach: Early years education in practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E7, Canada

    Elizabeth Y. S. Boileau

  2. Faculty of Education, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada

    Ziad F. Dabaja

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Y. S. Boileau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ziad F. Dabaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Y. S. Boileau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boileau, E.Y.S., Dabaja, Z.F. Forest School practice in Canada: a survey study. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 23, 225–240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00057-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00057-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation