Abstract
The construction industry, being a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, faces considerable attention and demand on account of the increasing global apprehension regarding climate change and its adverse impacts on the environment. Geopolymer shows itself as a viable and sustainable alternative to the Portland cement binder in civil infrastructure applications, offering a low-energy, low-carbon-footprint solution. This study evaluates five models: random forest (RF), robust linear regression (RL), recurrent neural network (RNN), response surface methodology (RSM), and regression tree (RT). The RL and RT models were utilized in the prediction of GPC compressive strength (CS), employing the Matlab R19a regression learner APP. The RNN model was implemented using the Matlab R19a toolkit. Furthermore, the RF model was developed using R studio version 4.2.2 programming code, and the RSM model was constructed using the Minitab 18 toolbox. EViews 12 software was utilized for both pre-processing and post-processing of the data. Additionally, it was employed to convert the non-stationary data into stationary data to obtain accurate results. The input variables included SiO2/Na2O (S/N), Na2O (N), water/binder ratio (W/B), curing time (CT), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), and 28-day compressive strength (MPa) (CS) as the target variable. The findings of the study indicate that the RMS-M3 model exhibited superior performance compared to all other models, demonstrating a high level of accuracy. Specifically, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was calculated to be 0.994, while the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was found to be 0.708 during the verification phase.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All the data and materials are accessible upon demand.
Code availability
Accessible upon demand.
References
Ahmad, A., Ahmad, W., Aslam, F., & Joyklad, P. (2022). Case studies in construction materials compressive strength prediction of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete via advanced machine learning techniques. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00840
Ahmad, A., Ahmad, W., Chaiyasarn, K., Ostrowski, K. A., Aslam, F., Zajdel, P., & Joyklad, P. (2021a). Prediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms. Polymers, 13, 3389.
Ahmad, M., Hu, J. L., Ahmad, F., Tang, X. W., Amjad, M., Iqbal, M. J., Asim, M., & Farooq, A. (2021b). Supervised learning methods for modeling concrete compressive strength prediction at high temperature. Materials, 14(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081983
Alhakeem, Z. M., Jebur, Y. M., Henedy, S. N., Imran, H., Bernardo, L. F. A., & Hussein, H. M. (2022). Prediction of ecofriendly concrete compressive strength using gradient boosting regression tree combined with gridsearch CV hyperparameter-optimization techniques. Materials, 15(21), 7432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217432
Ali, A. A., Al-attar, T. S., & Abbas, W. A. (2022). A statistical model to predict the strength development of geopolymer concrete based on SiO2/Al2O3 ratio variation. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(3), 454–471.
Aliyu, D. S., Malami, S. I., Anwar, F. H., Farouk, M. M., Labbo, M. S., & Abba, S. I. (2021). Prediction of compressive strength of lightweight concrete made with partially replaced cement by animal bone ash using artificial neural network. In 2021 1st International conference on multidisciplinary engineering and applied science, ICMEAS 2021 (pp. 315–320). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEAS52683.2021.9692317
Almutairi, A. L., Tayeh, B. A., Adesina, A., Isleem, H. F., & Zeyad, A. M. (2021). Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15(August), e00733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733
Amin, M. N., Khan, K., Ahmad, W., Javed, M. F., Qureshi, H. J., Saleem, M. U., Qadir, M. G., & Faraz, M. I. (2022a). Compressive strength estimation of geopolymer composites through novel computational approaches. Polymers, 14(10), 2128.
Amin, M. N., Khan, K., Javed, M. F., Aslam, F., Qadir, M. G., & Faraz, M. I. (2022b). Prediction of mechanical properties of fly-ash/slag-based geopolymer concrete using ensemble and non-ensemble machine-learning techniques. Materials, 15(10), 3478.
Aneja, S., Sharma, A., & Gupta, R. (2021). Bayesian regularized artificial neural network model to predict strength characteristics of fly-ash and bottom-ash based geopolymer concrete. Materials, 14(7), 1729.
Awolusi, T. F., Oke, O. L., Akinkurolere, O. O., & Sojobi, A. O. (2019). Application of response surface methodology: Predicting and optimizing the properties of concrete containing steel fibre extracted from waste tires with limestone powder as filler. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 10, e00212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00212
Breheny, P., & Burchett, W. (2015). Visualization of regression models using visreg, R package version 2.2-0 (pp. 1–15).
Chu, H., Ali, M., Javed, M., Zafar, A., Khan, M. I., Alabduljabbar, H., & Qayyum, S. (2021). Sustainable use of fly-ash : Use of gene-expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) for forecasting the compressive strength geopolymer concrete. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(4), 3603–3617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.03.018
Dadras, A. K. A., Javadi, E. S. M., & Malek, N. G. (2021). Machine learning regression approaches for predicting the ultimate buckling load of variable-stiffness composite. Acta Mechanica, 232(3), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02878-2
Farooq, F., Amin, M. N., Khan, K., Sadiq, M. R., Javed, M. F., Aslam, F., & Alyousef, R. (2020). A comparative study of random forest and genetic engineering programming for the prediction of compressive strength of high strength concrete (HSC). Applied Sciences (switzerland), 10(20), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207330
Glasby, T., Day, J., Genrich, R., & Aldred, J. (2015). Gp-airport. In Concrete 2015 conference (Vol. 11(1), pp. 1–9).
Gupta, T., & Sachdeva, S. N. (2021). Recurrent neural network-based prediction of compressive and flexural strength of steel slag mixed concrete. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(12), 6951–6963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05470-w
Haruna, S. I., Lawal, A., Adamu, M., Farouk, A. I. B., Malam, S. I., & Aliyu, M. M. (2021). Effects of jujube seed on the mechanical properties of the normal strength concrete. Sustainable Structure and Materials, 3(2020), 29–38.
Id, H. U. A., Mohammed, A. A., & Id, A. M. (2022). Soft computing models to predict the compressive strength of GGBS/FA-geopolymer concrete. PLoS ONE, 17, e0265846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265846
Imtiaz, L., Ur Rehman, S. K., Memon, S. A., Khan, M. K., & Javed, M. F. (2020). A review of recent developments and advances in eco-friendly geopolymer concrete. Applied Sciences (switzerland), 10(21), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217838
Jibril, M. M., Bello, A., Aminu, I. I., Ibrahim, A. S., Bashir, A., Malami, S. I., Habibu, M. A., & Magaji, M. M. (2022). An overview of streamflow prediction using random forest algorithm. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 13(1), 50–57.
Jibril, M. M., Zayyan, M. A., Idris, S., Usman, A. G., Salami, B. A., Rotimi, A., & Abba, S. I. (2023). Applications in engineering science implementation of nonlinear computing models and classical regression for predicting compressive strength of high-performance concrete. Applications in Engineering Science, 15, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apples.2023.100133
Kaveh, A., Eskandari, A., & Movasat, M. (2023). Buckling resistance prediction of high-strength steel columns using metaheuristic-trained artificial neural networks. Structures, 56, 104853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.043
Khalaf, A. A., Kopecsk, K., & Merta, I. (2022). Prediction of the compressive strength of fly ash geopolymer concrete by an optimised neural network model. Polymers, 14(7), 1423.
Li, N., Shi, C., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). A review on mixture design methods for geopolymer concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering, 178(September), 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107490
Liu, C., Li, B., Vorobeychik, Y., & Oprea, A. (2017). Robust linear regression against training data poisoning. In AISec 2017—Proceedings of the 10th ACM workshop on artificial intelligence and security, co-located with CCS 2017 (pp. 91–102). https://doi.org/10.1145/3128572.3140447
Ma, C. K., Awang, A. Z., & Omar, W. (2018). Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111
Malami, S. I., Anwar, F. H., Abdulrahman, S., Haruna, S. I., Ali, S. I. A., & Abba, S. I. (2021). Implementation of hybrid neuro-fuzzy and self-turning predictive model for the prediction of concrete carbonation depth: A soft computing technique. Results in Engineering, 10(May), 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100228
Moodi, Y., Mousavi, S. R., Ghavidel, A., Sohrabi, M. R., & Rashki, M. (2018). Using response surface methodology and providing a modified model using whale algorithm for estimating the compressive strength of columns confined with FRP sheets. Construction and Building Materials, 183, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.081
Müller, A. T., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2018). Recurrent neural network model for constructive peptide design. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 58(2), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00414
Naderpour, H., Rafiean, A. H., & Fakharian, P. (2018). Compressive strength prediction of environmentally friendly concrete using artificial neural networks. Journal of Building Engineering, 16, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007
Nazari, A., & Sanjayan, J. G. (2015). Modelling of compressive strength of geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete by optimized support vector machine. Ceramics International, 41(9 Part B), 12164–12177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.037
Neupane, K. (2018). High-strength geopolymer concrete- properties, advantages and challenges. Advances in Materials, 7(2), 15.
Nguyen, V. H., Bùi, D. T., & Dang, D. (2008). Recent research geopolymer concrete. In The 3rd ACF international conference-ACF/VCA, Vietnam (Vol. 18, pp. 235–241).
Pavithra, P., Srinivasula Reddy, M., Dinakar, P., Hanumantha Rao, B., Satpathy, B. K., & Mohanty, A. N. (2016). A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133(4), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.041
Pham, T. T., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, L. N., & Nguyen, P. V. (2020). A neural network approach for predicting hardened property of geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Geomate, 19(74), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.74.72565
Poorarbabi, A., Ghasemi, M., & Azhdary Moghaddam, M. (2020). Concrete compressive strength prediction using non-destructive tests through response surface methodology. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(4), 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.009
Ramesh, G. (2021). Geopolymer concrete: A review. Indian Journal of Structure Engineering, 1(2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijse.a1302.111221
Ramesh, V., & Srikanth, K. (2020). Mechanical properties and mix design of geopolymer concrete—A review. In E3S web of conferences (Vol. 184). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018401091
Rofooei, F. R., Kaveh, A., & Farahani, F. M. (2011). Estimating the vulnerability of the concrete moment resisting frame structures using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 1(3), 433–448.
Sarker, P. K. (2009). Analysis of geopolymer concrete columns. Materials and Structures/materiaux Et Constructions, 42(6), 715–724. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9415-5
Shahmansouri, A. A., Bengar, H. A., & Ghanbari, S. (2020). Compressive strength prediction of eco-efficient GGBS-based geopolymer concrete using GEP method. Journal of Building Engineering, 31, 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101326
Shahmansouri, A. A., Yazdani, M., Ghanbari, S., AkbarzadehBengar, H., Jafari, A., & Farrokh Ghatte, H. (2021). Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697
Sumajouw, M. D. J., & Rangan, B. V. (2006). Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: reinforced beams and columns (pp. 1–120). Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology.
Sun, Q., Zhu, H., Li, H., Zhu, H., & Gao, M. (2018). Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Revista Română De Materiale/romanian Journal of Materials, 48(1), 45–52.
Tan, K., Dang, Q., Anh, T., Shin, J., & Lee, K. (2020). Analyzing the compressive strength of green fly ash based geopolymer concrete using experiment and machine learning approaches. Construction and Building Materials, 247, 118581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118581
Tarasova, O. A., Koide, H., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Montzka, S. A., Krummel, P., & Brunke, E. (2012). The state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere using global observations through 2010. WMO Greenhouse Gas Bull, 14(1), 11012.
Toufigh, V., & Jafari, A. (2021). Developing a comprehensive prediction model for compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (FAGC). Construction and Building Materials, 277, 122241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122241
Van Dao, D., Ly, H. B., Trinh, S. H., Le, T. T., & Pham, B. T. (2019). Artificial intelligence approaches for prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Materials, 12(6), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060983
Varin, S. (2021). Comparing the Predictive Performance of Ols and 7 Robust Linear Regression Estimators on a Real and Simulated Datasets. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(11), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2021.v05i11.002
Verma, M., Upreti, K., & Alam, M. S. (2023). Prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete by using random forest algorithm prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete by using random forest algorithm. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25088-0
Yadollahi, M. M., Benli, A., & Demirboga, R. (2017). Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy technique and regression models to predict the compressive strength of geopolymer composites. Neural Computing and Applications, 28(6), 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2159-6
Yadollahi, M. M., Benli, A., & Demirboʇa, R. (2015). Prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer composites using an artificial neural network. Materials Research Innovations, 19(6), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1179/1433075X15Y.0000000020
Funding
Not available.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contrubuted equally.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest as declared by the authors.
Ethical approval
No.
Consent to participate
Yes.
Consent for publication
Yes.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jibril, M.M., Malami, S.I., Jibrin, H.B. et al. New random intelligent chemometric techniques for sustainable geopolymer concrete: low-energy and carbon-footprint initiatives. Asian J Civ Eng 25, 2287–2305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00908-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00908-7