Abstract
Purpose
Due to the few reports on the 91Sr half-life previously, the accuracy and uncertainty of the results are difficult to meet the requirements such as calculating the cross section and the fission yields of 235U, 238U, and 239Pu. To solve the discrepancy of 91Sr half-life in existing experimental data, the half-life of 91Sr was measured in this work, and the uncertainty was discussed in detail.
Method
The measurements were performed by the activation method implemented for the uranium sample using the K-400 neutron generator at the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP). The half-life of 91Sr was measured by γ-ray spectrometry using the high-resolution High Purity Germanium (HPGe) Detector.
Results
Through exponential function fitting and a detailed discussion of the uncertainty evaluation, the half-life of 91Sr in the present work was determined to be 9.65 ± 0.30 h, which was consistent with the values reported previously and the uncertainty was reduced greatly, however, the uncertainty assessment of the latter was barely documented.
Conclusions
In this work, a more accurate measurement of the 91Sr half-life is provided, as well as the uncertainty is discussed in detail. This result will provide essential information for applications using an activation method, such as the calculation of fission yields of 235U, 238U, and 239Pu.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.S. Smith, Nucl. Phys. A 718, 339–346 (2003)
J. Laurec, A. Adam, T. De Bruyne et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 111(12), 2965–2980 (2010)
M. Mac Innes, M. Chadwick, T. Kawano, Nucl. Data Sheets 112(12), 3135–3152 (2011)
M.E. Gooden, C. Arnold, J. Becker et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 131, 319–356 (2016)
T.N. Szegedi, Á. Tóth, G.G. Kiss et al., Eur. Phys. J 56(7), 1–7 (2020)
S. Nakamura, K. Furutaka, H. Wada et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol 38(12), 1029–1034 (2001)
H. Harada, T. Sekine, Y. Hatsukawa et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol 31(3), 173–179 (1994)
M. Lone, W. Edwards, R. Collins, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 332(1–2), 232–238 (1993)
L.A. McVey, R.L. Brodzinski, T.M. Tanner, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem 76(1), 131–137 (1983)
J.D. Knight, O.E. Johnson, A.B. Tucker et al., Nucl. Phys. A 130(2), 433–448 (1969)
[dataest] Coral M. Baglin. Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 1293. https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/decaysearchdirect.jsp?nuc=91SR&unc=nds (2013)
Y.Y. Chu, E.M. Franz, G. Friedlander, Nucl. Phys. B 40, 428–436 (1972)
S. Nakamura, K. Furutaka, H. Wada et al. in Jaeri-Conf--2001–006 (2001)
S. Nakamura, T. Katoh, K. Furutaka et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol 39(2), 258–261 (2002)
C.M. Baglin, Nucl. Data Sheets 114(10), 1293–1495 (2013)
D. Ames, M. Bunker, L. Langer et al., Phys. R 91(1), 68 (1953)
G. Herrmann, Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie 58(8), 626–629 (1954)
B. Ehrenberg, S. Amiel, Phys. R. C 6(2), 618 (1972)
S. Pommé, J. Camps, R. Van Ammel et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem 276(2), 335–339 (2008)
S. Pommé, Metrologia 52(3), S51–S65 (2015)
E. Browne, R.B. Firestone, V.S. Shirley, Table of radioactive isotopes. United States. (1986)
J. Luo, L. Du, J. Zhao, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 298, 61–65 (2013)
X. Wang, S. Jiang, M. He et al., Phys. R. C 87(1), 014612 (2013)
S.M. Collins, A.V. Harms, P.H. Regan, Appl. Radiat. Isot 108, 143–147 (2016)
S. Pommé, T. De Hauwere, Appl. Radiat. Isot 158, 109046 (2020)
S. Pommé. Appl. Model. Comput. Nucl. Sci pp 282–292
H. Verheul, W.B. Ewbank, Nucl 114(10), 1293–1495 (2013)
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the staff of K-400 facility at Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics, for their excellent operation of the neutron generator and other support during the experiment. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11975113).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Y., Lan, C., Feng, L. et al. Determination of the half-life of 91Sr in uranium sample bombarded by 14.8 MeV neutron. Radiat Detect Technol Methods 6, 361–366 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-022-00332-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-022-00332-6