Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of acid etching, Er, Cr: YSGG laser conditioning and combining on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal bracket

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Dental Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The present study aims to evaluate the shear bond strength and the adhesive remnants index (ARI) of metal brackets. For this purpose, enamel etched with acid, Er; Cr: YSGG (2780 nm) laser, and a combination of them.

Methods

In this study, 60 human premolars were divided into three groups (acid, Er, Cr: YSGG (2780 nm) laser, and combined etching). Each group contains 20 teeth. For testing of shear bond strength (SBS), the force applied by a universal testing machine. All the samples were examined under a light stereomicroscope to determine the bond failure mode.

Results

The results revealed that the laser-acid group had the maximum mean shear bond strength while the acid group had the minimum shear bond strength. The values of mean shear bond strength obtained of 25.90, 16.94, and16.60 MPa for laser-acid, laser, and acid, respectively. Laser and acid groups were negligibly different from each other, while they were significantly different from the lasers–acid group (p < 0.05). Regardless of the preparation of the enamel, bond failure occurred predominantly in the enamel-adhesive site.

Conclusions

Er, Cr: YSGG (2780 nm) laser conditioning in combination with acid led to high shear bond strength, but the hazardous effect on tooth should be considered. The bond failure mode was almost similar among all three groups, where there was no adhesive left on the surface of the tooth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Habibi M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T (2007) Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132(5):675–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitahara-Ceia FMF, Mucha JN, dos Santos PAM (2008) Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134(4):548–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishara SE, Fonseca JM, Boyer DB (1995) The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 108(3):242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Botta SB, Da Ana PA, Zezell DM, Powers JM, Matos AB (2009) Adhesion after erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser application at three different irradiation conditions. Lasers Med Sci 24(1):67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Issar R, Mazumdar D, Ranjan S, Krishna NK, Kole R, Singh P, Lakiang D, Jayam C (2016) Comparative evaluation of the etching pattern of Er, Cr: YSGG & acid etching on extracted human teeth-an ESEM analysis. J Clin Diagn Res 10(5):ZC01–ZC05

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Eversole LR, Rizoiu IM (1995) Preliminary investigations on the utility of an erbium, chromium YSGG laser. J Calif Dent Assoc 23(12):41–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eversole L, Rizoiu I (1997) Pulpal response to cavity preparation by an erbium, chromium: YSGG laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Am Dent Assoc 128(8):1099–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin S, Caputo AA, Eversole LR, Rizoiu I (1999) Topographical characteristics and shear bond strength of tooth surfaces cut with a laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Prosthet Dent 82(4):451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verma M, Kumari P, Gupta R, Gill S, Gupta A (2015) Comparative evaluation of surface topography of tooth prepared using erbium, chromium: Yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet laser and bur and its clinical implications. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 15(1):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Basaran G, Ozer T, Berk N, Hamamcı O (2007) Etching enamel for orthodontics with an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser system. Angle Orthod 77(1):117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Basaran G, Hamamcı N, Akkurt A (2011) Shear bond strength of bonding to enamel with different laser irradiation distances. Lasers Med Sci 26(2):149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghaffari H, Mirhashemi A, Baherimoghadam T, Azmi A, Rasooli R (2017) Effect of Surface Treatment on Enamel Cracks After Orthodontic Bracket Debonding: Er, Cr: YSGG Laser-Etching Versus Acid-Etching. J Dent (Tehran) 14(5):259

    Google Scholar 

  13. Artun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 85(4):333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee BS, Hsieh TT, Lee YL, Lan WH, Hsu YJ, Wen PH, Lin CP (2003) Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid-etched, Er: YAG laser-irradiated and combined treatment on enamel surface. Angle Orthod 73(5):565–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds I (1975) A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 2(3):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krishnan K, Kumaran NK, Iyer VH, Rajasigamani K (2013) Laser etched vs conventional etched enamel: Effect on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Int J Laser Dent 3:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chinelatti M, Borsatto M, Pecora J, Palma-Dibb R, Corona S (2006) Effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation distance on superficial dentin morphology. Am J Dent 19(4):217–221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR (1999) Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 115(1):24–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suliman SN, Trojan TM, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A (2014) Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro. The Angle Orthodontist. 85(4):651–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. JMd R, Gravina MA, MJdS C, CCA Q, Elias CN, RWF V (2014) Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets. Dental Press J Orthod 19(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zachrisson BU, Arthun J (1979) Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 75(2):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Day CJ, Price R, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ (2008) Inhalation of aerosols produced during the removal of fixed orthodontic appliances: a comparison of 4 enamel cleanup methods. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 133(1):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neda Hosseini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study (optional).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roshan, A., Hosseini, N. Effect of acid etching, Er, Cr: YSGG laser conditioning and combining on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal bracket. Laser Dent Sci 3, 235–239 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-019-00080-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-019-00080-9

Keywords

Navigation