Abstract
The mass attenuation coefficients (μ/ρ) of a natural material, i.e., olive peat, were measured at photon energies of 0.059, 0.356, 0.662, 1.17, and 1.332 MeV and compared with those of concrete and Pb. The experimental samples were irradiated with 214Am, 133Ba, 137Cs, and 60Co point sources using a transmission arrangement. The olive peat samples were obtained from different areas in Jordan, namely Mafraq (sample M), Kerak (sample K), Ajloun (sample A), and Irbid (sample I), and photon energies were measured using a NaI(Tl) scintillation detector with an energy resolution of 7.6% at 662 keV. The differences in the µ/ρ of olive peat samples and the calculated µ/ρ of concrete were consistently within 0.7% at photon energies of 0.356–1.332 MeV. This finding indicates that olive peat can be used in radiation applications in the field of medical physics. Finally, the half-value layer (HVL) of the experimental samples was measured, and results were compared with those of concrete and Pb. Pb and concrete exhibited minimal HVL values due to their high density, and the HVL of olive peat revealed lower shielding effectiveness than that of concrete.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O. Al-Ketan, Potential of using olive pomace as a source of renewable energy for electricity generation in the Kingdom of Jordan. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 4, 063132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769205
F. Ceglie, H. Elshafie, V. Verrastro et al., Evaluation of olive pomace and green waste composts as peat substitutes for organic tomato seedling production. Compost. Sci. Util. 19, 293–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2011.10737011
I. Rotherham, Peat and Peat Cutting (Bloomsbury Publishing, London, 2011). (ISBN: 9780747807056)
A. Madi, L. Kuraan, Jordan Olive Monthly Report (National Centre for Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer, Amman, 1999)
I. Salinas, C. Conti, R. Lopes, Effective density and mass attenuation coefficient for building material in Brazil. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 64, 13–18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.07.003
K.S. Mann, B. Kaur, G.S. Sidhu et al., Investigations of some building materials for γ-rays shielding effectiveness. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 87, 16–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.02.012
K. Satoh, N. Ohashi, H. Higuchi et al., Determination of attenuation coefficient for self-absorption correction in routine gamma ray spectrometry of environmental bulk sample. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 84, 431–440 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02036983
M. Sayyed, F. Akman, I. Geçibesler et al., Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for different parts of medicinal aromatic plants in low-energy region. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 29, 144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0475-0
H.O. Tekin, E.E. Altunsoy, T. Manici et al., Mass attenuation coefficients of human body organs using MCNPX Monte Carlo code. Iran. J. Med. Phys. 14, 229–240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2017.23478.1230
H.O. Tekin, M. Karahan, T.T. Erguzel et al., Radiation shielding parameters of some antioxidants using Monte Carlo method. J. Biol. Phys. 44, 579–590 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-018-9507-6
H. Tekin, M. Sayyed, O. Kilicoglu et al., Calculation of gamma-ray attenuation properties of some antioxidants using Monte Carlo simulation method. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 4, 057001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aad297
A. Abdo, M. Ali, M. Ismail, Natural fibre high-density polyethylene and lead oxide composites for radiation shielding. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 66, 185–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(02)00470-X
I. Akkurt, R. Altindag, T. Onargan et al., The properties of various igneous rocks for γ-ray shielding. Constr. Build. Mater. 21, 2078–2082 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.059
J. Osborn, T. Ersez, G. Braoudakis, Radiation shielding design for neutron diffractometers assisted by Monte Carlo methods. Phys. B Condens. Matter 385, 1321–1323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2006.06.064
C. Zeitlin, S. Guetersloh, L. Heilbronn et al., Measurements of materials shielding properties with 1 GeV/nuc 56Fe. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 252, 308–318 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2006.08.011
I.F. Al-Hamarneh, M.W. Marashdeh, F.I. Almasoud et al., Determination of gamma-ray parameters for polyethylene glycol of different molecular weights. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 28, 157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0311-y
A. El-Sersy, A. Hussein, H. El-Samman et al., Mass attenuation coefficients of B2O3–Al2O3–SiO2–CaF2 glass system at 0.662 and 1.25 MeV gamma energies. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 288, 65–69 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0924-7
I. Akkurt, Effective atomic and electron numbers of some steels at different energies. Ann. Nucl. Energy 36, 1702–1705 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.09.005
I. Akkurt, C. Basyigit, S. Kilincarslan et al., Radiation shielding of concretes containing different aggregates. Cem. Concr. Compos. 28, 153–157 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.006
ICRU Report 33, Radiation Quantities and Units Pub: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Washington, DC (1980). https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.2580180918
I. Akkurt, H. Akyıldırım, B. Mavi et al., Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete includes barite in different rate. Ann. Nucl. Energy 37, 910–914 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.04.001
M. Berger, J. Hubbell, S. Seltzeret al., XCOM: photon cross sections database, NIST standard reference database 8 (XGAM) (2010). https://doi.org/10.18434/t48g6x
M. Abdel-Rahman, E. Badawi, Y. Abdel-Hady et al., Effect of sample thickness on the measured mass attenuation coefficients of some compounds and elements for 59.54, 661.6 and 1332.5 keV γ-rays. Nucl. Instrum. Methods. Phys. Res. Sect. A 447, 432–436 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9002(99)01257-7
V. Singh, S. Shirmardi, M. Medhat et al., Determination of mass attenuation coefficient for some polymers using Monte Carlo simulation. Vacuum 119, 284–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.06.006
N. Kucuk, M. Cakir, N. Isitman, Mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for some polymers. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 153, 127–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs091
A. Akkaş, Determination of the tenth and half value layer thickness of concretes with different densities. Acta Phys. Pol. A 1294, 770–772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.129.770
H. Mann, G. Brar, K. Mann et al., Experimental investigation of clay fly ash bricks for gamma-ray shielding. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48, 1230–1236 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.04.001
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dr. Hajo Idriss Mohammad (Sudan Atomic Energy Commission) for providing assistance in obtaining the elemental composition of the olive peat samples by energy-dispersive X-ray analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marashdeh, M.W., Saleh, H. Mass attenuation coefficient of olive peat material for absorbing gamma ray energy. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0637-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0637-8