Abstract
Plum pox virus (PPV) is one of the most destructive viral pathogens infecting stone fruit trees worldwide. As PPV causes a viral disease that requires plants to be quarantined, the development of a reliable method of PPV detection is essential for preventing the spread of the disease. In this study, an isothermal reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) assay was developed for the detection of PPV in peaches. The major advantage of this RT-RPA assay is that it can be performed at 42 °C and can be completed in 10 min and has specificity for viruses that infect peaches. In addition, this assay was successfully performed using field-collected samples. This RT-RPA assay is a promising method with high efficiency for rapid PPV detection as part of quarantine inspection and certification program.
References
Bak SM, Seo EC, Kim SY, Park WH, Lee SH (2017) First report of apricot pseudo-chlorotic leaf spot virus infecting peach trees in South Korea. Res Plant Dis 23(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2017.23.1.75
Barba M, Hadidi A, Candresse T, Cambra M (2011) Plum pox virus (Chapter 36). In: Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T, Jelkmann W (eds) Virus and virus-like disease of pome and stone fruits. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890545010.036
EPPO (2004) Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests: plum pox potyvirus. Bull OEPP EPPO 34:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2004.00726.x
EPPO (2013) POR_EPPO database on quarantine pests. http://www.eppo.int
García JA, Glasa M, Cambra M, Candresse T (2014) Plum pox virus and sharka: a model potyvirus and a major disease. Mol Plant Pathol 15(3):226–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12083
Higgins M, Ravenhall M, Ward D, Phelan J, Ibrahim A, Forrest MS, Clark TG, Campino S (2019) PrimedRPA: primer design for recombinase polymerase amplification assays. Bioinformatics 35(4):682–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty701
Levy L, Damsteegt V, Welliver R (2000) First report of plum pox virus (sharka disease) in Prunus persica in the United States. Plant Dis 84:202. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.2.202B
Nassuth A, Pollari E, Helmeczy K, Stewart S, Kofalvi SA (2000) Improved RNA extraction and one-tube RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of control plant RNA plus several viruses in plant extracts. J Virol Methods 90:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0934(00)00211-1
Oh JH, Park CY, Lee HK, Yeom YA, Lim SM, Moon JS, Lee SH (2016) First report of plum pox virus strain D isolate in peach (Prunus persica) in Korea. Plant Dis. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-16-0979-PDN
Olmos A, Capote N, Candresse T (2006) Detection of characterization of Plum pox virus: molecular methods. OEPP EPPO Bull 36:262–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.00984.x
Polak J (1998) Relative concentration of plum pox virus in leaves and flowers of some Prunus species and cultivars. Acta Virol 42:264–267
Rodamilans B, Valli A, García JA (2019) Molecular plant-plum pox virus interactions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 33(1):6–17. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-19-0189-FI
Rubio M, Martínez-Gómez P, Marais A, Sánchez-Navarro JA, Pallás V, Candresse T (2017) Recent advances and prospects in Prunus virology. Ann Appl Biol 171:125–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12371
Schneider WL, Sherman DJ, Stone AL, Damsteegt VD, Frederick RD (2004) Specific detection and quantification of plum pox virus by real-time fluorescent reverse transcription-PCR. J Virol Methods 120:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.04.010
Scholthof KG, Adkins S, Czosnek H, Palukaitis P, Jacquot E, Hohn T, Hohn B, Saunders K, Candresse T, Ahlquist P, Hemenway C, Foster G (2011) Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 12:938–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00752.x
Sihelská N, Glasa M, Šubr ZW (2017) Host preference of the major strains of Plum pox virus—opinions based on regional and world-wide sequence data. J Integrat Agric 16:510–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61356-4
Sochor J, Babula P, Adam V, Krska B, Kizek R (2012) Sharka: the past, the present and the future. Viruses 4(11):2853–2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4112853
Thompson D, McCann M, MacLeod M, Lye D, Green M, James D (2001) First report of plum pox virus in Ontario, Canada. Plant Dis 85:97. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.1.97C
Toma S, Isac M, Balan V, Ivascu A (1998) Detection of plum pox virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in some apricot and peach varieties and hybrids in Romania. Acta Virol 42(4):276–277
Varga A, James D (2006) Use of reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of plum pox virus. J Virol Methods 138(1–2):184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.08.014
Youssef SA, Shalaby AA, Mazyad HM, Hadidi A (2002) Detection of identification of prune dwarf virus and plum pox virus by standard and multiplex RT-PCR probe capture hybridization (RT-PCR-ELISA). J Plant Pathol 84(2):113–119. https://doi.org/10.4454/jpp.v84i2.1094
Zhang S, Ravelonandro M, Russell P, McOwen N, Briard P, Bohannon S, Vrient A (2014) Rapid diagnostic detection of plum pox virus in Prunus plants by isothermal AmplifyRP® using reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification. J Virol Methods 207:114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.06.026
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out with the support of Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ014947032020) Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, HW., Lee, HJ., Cho, IS. et al. Rapid detection of plum pox virus by reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification. J Plant Dis Prot 128, 881–885 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00452-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00452-z