Abstract
The flow's velocity field with the lateral contraction and expansion in an open channel around bridge abutment was measured with laser Doppler anemometry (LDA), and the free-surface profile was determined using a limnimeter for two flow discharges. Basic equations of fluid flow are solved by the ANSYS Fluent program based on the finite volume method for the same experimental flow conditions. In the numerical simulations, the detached eddy simulation (DES) model is used to simulate the turbulence, and the free-surface profile is calculated using the volume of fluid method (VOF). Computational results for free-surface profiles and horizontal velocity component are compared with measured data for the two cases. The length of the separation zone formed in the downstream region of the bridge abutments is considerably larger than in the upstream region. The length of this region downstream (Ls) is greatest at the channel bottom and is approximately 14 d (d: length of the bridge abutment perpendicular to the flow). The thickness of the separation zone was similar around both piers. In the contraction region, the horizontal maximum velocity component (umax) occurred at z/zmax = ± 0.5, not in the central axis. Moreover, the umax is larger in the downstream region than in the upstream region, umax = 1.5uo and umax = 2uo for Cases 1 and 2, respectively. The experimental and numerical results indicate that the DES model accurately predicts the velocity field and free-surface profiles under the present flow conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- Q :
-
Flow rate
- V 0 :
-
Average velocity in the channel beginning
- Re0 :
-
Reynolds number in the channel beginning
- Fr0 :
-
Froude number in the channel beginning
- U 0 :
-
Time-averaged stream-wise velocity component in the x direction on the inlet boundary
- g :
-
Acceleration due to the gravity
- h 0 :
-
Water height in the channel beginning
- ν :
-
Kinematic viscosity of water
- w :
-
Bridge abutment length
- d :
-
Bridge abutment width
- L :
-
Channel length
- B :
-
Channel width
- Q :
-
Flow rate
- R :
-
Crest radius
- u :
-
Stream-wise velocity component in x direction
- v :
-
Spanwise velocity component in y direction
- w :
-
Vertical velocity component in z direction
- F :
-
Volume fraction
- L s :
-
Length of the separation region
- t s :
-
Thickness of the separation region
- I :
-
Turbulence intensity
References
Akoz MS, Gumus V, Kirkgoz MS (2014) Numerical simulation of flow over a semicylinder weir. J Irrig Drainag Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000717
ANSYS (2012) Fluent theory guide. ANSYS Inc, USA
Ardiclioglu M, Hadi AMWM, Periku E, Kuriqi A (2022) Experimental and numerical investigation of bridge configuration effect on hydraulic regime. Int J Civil Eng 20:981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00715-2
Arrufat T, Crialesi-Esposito M, Fuster D, Ling Y, Malan L, Pal S, Zaleski S (2021) A mass-momentum consistent, volume-of-Fluid method for incompressible flow on staggered grids. Comput Fluids 215:104785
Baker N, Kelly G, O’Sullivan PD (2019) A grid convergence index study of mesh style effect on the accuracy of the numerical results for an indoor airflow profile. Int J Vent 19:300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733315.2019.1667558
Basser H, Cheraghi R, Karami H, Ardeshir A, Amirmojahedi M, Akib S, Shamshirband S (2015) Modeling sediment transport around a rectangular bridge abutment. Environ Fluid Mech 15:1105–1114
Bento AM, Viseu T, Pêgo JP, Couto L (2021) Experimental characterization of the flow field around oblong bridge piers. Fluids 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6110370
Broekema YB, Labeur RJ, Uijttewaal WSJ (2019) Suppression of vertical flow separation over steep slopes in open channels by horizontal flow contraction. J Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.972
Durst F, Melling A, Whitelaw J (1976) Principles and practice of laser doppler anemometry. Academic Press, London
Fakhimjoo MS, Ardeshir A, Behzadian K, Karami H (2023) Experimental investigation and flow analysis of clear-water scour around pier and abutment in proximity. Water Sci Eng 16:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2022.12.001
Goldstein R (2017) Fluid mechanics measurements. Hemisphere Publishing Corp, Washington
Gumus V, Simsek O, Soydan NG, Akoz MS, Kirkgoz MS (2015) Numerical modeling of submerged hydraulic jump from a sluice gate. J Irrig Drain Eng 142:04015037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000948
Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (Vof) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39:201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
Ikani N, Pu JH, Taha T, Hanmaiahgarib PR, Penna N (2023) Bursting phenomenon created by bridge piers group in open channel flow. Environ Fluid Mech 23:125–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-023-09910-8
Kang S, Sotiropoulos F (2012) Numerical modeling of 3D turbulent free surface flow in natural waterways. Adv Water Resour 40:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.012
Kara S, Stoesser T, Sturm TW, Mulahasan S (2014) Flow dynamics through a submerged bridge opening with overtopping. J Hydraul Res 53:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2014.967821
Khosronejad A, Kang S (2012) Sotiropoulos FJAiWR. Exp Comput Invest Local Scour around Bridge Piers 37:73–85
Kirkgoz MS, Ardiclioglu M (1997) Velocity profiles of developing and developed open channel flow. J Hydraul Eng-Asce 123:1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:12(1099)
Kirkil G, Constantinescu G, Ettema R (2009) Detached eddy simulation investigation of turbulence at a circular pier with scour hole. J Hydraul Eng 135:888–901. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000101
Kocaman S (2014) Prediction of backwater profiles due to bridges in a compound channel using CFD. Adv Mech Eng 6:905217. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/905217
Koken M, Constantinescu G (2009) An investigation of the dynamics of coherent structures in a turbulent channel flow with a vertical sidewall obstruction. Phys Fluids 21:085104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3207859
Lee M, Park G, Park C, Kim C, Tangchirapat W (2020) Improvement of grid independence test for computational fluid dynamics model of building based on grid resolution. Adv Civil Eng 2020:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8827936
Lizarose Samion SR, Shaharuddin NH, Mat Ali MS (2019) Grid convergence study for detached-eddy simulation of flow over rod-airfoil configuration using openFOAM. IOP Confer Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/491/1/012023
Niyazi H, Yaban H, Demirel E (2022) Structure and dynamics of the turbulent flow through a central baffle. Flow Measure Ins. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102248
Paik J, Sotiropoulos F (2005) Coherent structure dynamics upstream of a long rectangular block at the side of a large aspect ratio channel. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2130743
Paik J, Escauriaza C, Sotiropoulos F (2007) On the bimodal dynamics of the turbulent horseshoe vortex system in a wing-body junction. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2716813
Shankar NJ, Chan ES, Zhang QY (2010) Three-dimensional numerical simulation for an open channel flow with a constriction. J Hydraul Res 39:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680109499820
Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang ZG, Zhu J (1995) A new kappa-epsilon eddy viscosity model for high reynolds-number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids 24:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T
Simsek O, Akoz MS, Soydan NG (2016) Numerical validation of open channel flow over a curvilinear broad-crested weir. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn Int J. https://doi.org/10.1504/pcfd.2016.080055
Soydan Oksal NG, Akoz MS, Simsek O (2020) Numerical modelling of trapezoidal weir flow with RANS, LES and DES models. Sadhana 45:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-01332-2
Spalart PR (2009) Detached-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 41:181–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165130
Spalart P (1999) Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations. In: Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments 4. Elsevier, pp 3–17
Sun B, Zhu S, Yang L, Liu Q, Zhang C, ping Zhang J (2021) Experimental and numerical investigation of flow measurement mechanism and hydraulic performance on curved flume in rectangular channel. Arabian J Sci Eng 46:4409–4420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04949-x
Versteeg H, Malalasekera W (1995) An introduction to computational fluid dynamics. Finite Volume Method. Longman Scientific Technical, Essex
Yanmaz AM (2002) Dynamic reliability in bridge pier scouring. Turkish J Eng Environ Sci 26:367–376
Yu P, Zhu L (2020) Numerical simulation of local scour around bridge piers using novel inlet turbulent boundary conditions. Ocean Eng 218:108166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108166
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by FBA-2018-8862 Project number by Cukurova University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Thank you for your support.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NGSO contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis investigation, resources, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. MSA contributed to conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision. OS contributed to methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Soydan-Oksal, N.G., Akoz, M.S. & Simsek, O. An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Flow Characteristics Around Bridge Abutment. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 48, 1671–1693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01245-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01245-0