Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financing higher education and education loans in India: interstate differentials and determinants

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Social and Economic Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt is made here to examine financing of higher education across states using interest subsidy as a case of reference. Hence, we make an analysis of the relative shares of interest subsidies in student loans, enrolment, etc. The paper uses various published and unpublished secondary sources to answer these questions. Using the pooled OLS regression across 23 states for the period from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013, the present paper attempts to explore the question whether government expenditure on higher education and student loan is substitutes or complements. Also the present paper attempts to estimate the magnitude of influence of state income on government expenditure on higher education. Other factors such as institutional access, secondary school enrolment rate, share of young population and region are included as explanatory variables in the models. The interstate disparity can be understood better if we examine the enabling environment to access interest subsidy. In other words, we raise certain basic questions such as: How is higher education distributed across states? How this distribution has evolved overtime?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This concern is supported by various statistical analyses. Yet, conclusions are sensitive to what measures of attainment are used.

  2. It is because around forty per cent of the total expenditure on higher and technical education is spent by central government. There is no information on how it is distributed across states. In the absence of such information, as a next best alternative, the ratio of state enrolment to all India enrolment has been used as a criterion to apportion the expenditures across states. It might encounter problems such as some of the states having more enrolment compared to other states could be in reality getting a lesser amount of central expenditures than other states and vice versa.

  3. States reporting less than one per cent of beneficiaries include Gujarat, Uttaranchal, Pondicherry, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, Delhi, Manipur, Andaman & Nicobar, Goa, Chandigarh, Tripura, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, DNH, Daman & Diu, Lakshadweep, Sikkim and Nagaland.

  4. States reporting less than one per cent of beneficiaries include Gujarat, Uttarakhand, Pondicherry, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, Delhi, Manipur, Andaman & Nicobar, Tripura, Goa, Chandigarh, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman &Diu, Nagaland, Sikkim and Lakshadweep.

References

  • AICTE (1999) Technical Education in India in Independent India: 1947–1997 A Compendium to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of Independence, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi

  • AIHS (2013) All India Higher Education Survey, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi

  • Bashir S (2000) Government Expenditure on Elementary Education in the Nineties. The European Commission, New Delhi

  • Chakrabarty A, Joglekar R (2006) Determinants of public expenditure on education: an empirical analysis using state level data. Econ Polit Wkly 41(15):1465–1472

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty A (2009) Some normatively relevant aspects of inter-state and intra-state disparities. Econ Polit Wkly 44(26–27):179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankseliani M (2014) ‘Rural disadvantage in Georgian Higher Education Admissions: A Mixed-method Study’, in Fair Access to Higher Education: Global Perspective, (ed.) by Zimdars et al, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Chatterji M, Mohan S, Dastidar SG (2014) Determinants of public education expenditure: Evidence from Indian states, Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics, University of Dundee, Working Paper No. 279

  • Datt G, Ravallion M (1998) Farm productivity and rural poverty in India. J Dev Stud 34(4):62–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreze J, Sen AK (2002) India: Development and Participation. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Filmer D, Pritchett L (2001) Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 38(1):115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Geetha Rani P (2015) ‘Interstate disparities in interest subsidies on education loans in India; why and how does it persist?’ University News, 53(48) 74–85

  • Geetha Rani PG (2015b) Interstate disparities in interest subsidies on education loans in India; why and how does it persist? Univ News 53(48):74–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhingran D, Shankar D (2009) Addressing educational disparity: Using district level education development indices for equitable resource allocations in India, Policy Research Working Paper, WPS, 4955, World Bank, South Asia Region, New Delhi

  • Kujur R (2008) “Naxalite Movements in India: A Profile”, Working Paper, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi

  • Kulkarni PM (2002) Inter-State Variations in Human Development Differentials among Social Groups in India, NCAER Working Paper, New Delhi

  • Kumari R (2014) Growing regional disparities in Uttar Pradesh: inter-district analysis. ArthaVijnana 56(3):339–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan YK (2007) “The direct substitution between government and private consumption in East Asia”, in Fiscal Policy and Management in East Asia, NBER-EASE, Volume 16, (Ed) Takatoshi Ito and Andrew K. Rose, University of Chicago Press, ISBN: 978-0-226-38681-2 http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0368

  • Mehrotra S et al (2005) Universalizing elementary education in india: uncaging the tiger economy. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij J, Dev SM (2004) Social sector priorities: an analysis of budgets and expenditures in India in the 1990s. Dev Policy Rev 22(1):97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1957) Economic theory and underdeveloped region. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal P, Ghosh J (2007) “Inequality in India: A Survey of Recent Trends”, Social Affairs, pp.1–28

  • Panchamukhi PR (2000) “Social impact of economic reforms in India: a critical appraisal. Econ Polit Wkly 35(10):853–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar KS, Reddy AV (2011) Investment and economic opportunities: Urbanization, infrastructure and governance in The North and South of India. Asia-Pacific Dev J 18(1):1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Geetha Rani.

Appendix: Interest Subsidy Scheme to Education Loans to Economically Weaker Sections

Appendix: Interest Subsidy Scheme to Education Loans to Economically Weaker Sections

Realizing the scheme’s insensitivity to low-income students, Government of India in its Union Budget 2009–2010, after a decade of loan’s operation, introduced a supplementary scheme to provide interest subsidy during the period of moratorium. The Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, has launched this interest subsidy scheme with the main purpose of helping economically weaker sections. Canara Bank is Nodal Bank designated by MHRD to administer interest subsidy to scheduled commercial banks. The interest moratorium is attributed to be identified beneficiary loan accounts during each year. The details of the interest subsidy scheme include the following:

  • Students belonging to economically weaker sections with annual gross parental/family income from all sources with an upper limit of Rs. 4.50 lakhs.

  • Certificate to this effect issued by authorized officers of state government is to be submitted. The state governments designate district- and block-level revenue officials to vet the papers that applicants furnish as a proof of family income.

  • Only for educational loans availed from scheduled banks for pursuing any of the approved courses after Class XII in technical and professional streams from recognized institutes in India.

  • Full interest subsidy is available for the period of moratorium, i.e. course period plus 1 year or 6 months after getting the job, whichever is earlier. Interest on outstanding loan amount to be paid by student;

  • Interest subsidy is available to the eligible students only once, either for the first undergraduate degree course or the postgraduate degrees/diplomas. Interest subsidy is admissible for combined undergraduate and postgraduate courses;

  • Interest subsidy is not available either for those students who discontinue or for those who are expelled from the institutions on disciplinary or academic grounds but available for discontinuation due to medical grounds.

  • Scheme is applicable for the loan amount availed from 01 April 2009 to 31 March 2010 (academic year 2009–2010).

  • Those students who availed this interest subsidy will get 1% concession in interest rates as per the design of the IBA scheme on education loans (for details www.mhrd.nic.in) (Table 9).

    Table 9 Region and States

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geetha Rani, P. Financing higher education and education loans in India: interstate differentials and determinants. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 19, 42–59 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-017-0034-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-017-0034-2

Keywords

Navigation