Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perspectives on Medical Education in an Increasingly Globalized Society: Recognizing and Embracing Our Diversity

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical curricula around the globe are diverse, accommodating the social, political, cultural, and health needs in each country. Every medical school has the responsibility to educate graduates capable of providing quality medical care to their communities. Yet true globalization of medical education is a challenge. Little is known about the intrinsic variations which impact curricula in countries around the world. There are unique, often historical reasons that explain the challenges in attaining a genuine globalization of the medical curricula. This perspective provides a glance and general comparison of traditions, economic, and socio-political influences on medical education across seven countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

This persective did not collect data there is none available.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia. Role of medical education in addressing the current health challenges. 2013. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206335. Accessed 01 June 2022.

  2. Bedoll D, van Zanten M, McKinley D. Global trends in medical education accreditation. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00588-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck U. What is globalization? Malden: Blackwell; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mittelman M, Hanaway P. Globalization of Healthcare. Glob Adv Health Med. 2012;1(2):5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. IAMSE (International Association of Medical Science Educators). 2022. Available at http://www.iamse.org/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  6. MDANZ (Medical Deans of Australia and New Zealand). Reports and Statements. 2022. Available at https://medicaldeans.org.au/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  7. Rizwan M, Rosson NJ, Tackett S, et al. Globalization of Medical Education: Current Trends and Opportunities for Medical Students. J Medic Educ Training. 2018;2:035.

    Google Scholar 

  8. AAMC (Association of American Medical Colleges) Data and Reports. 2022. Available at https://www.aamc.org/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  9. FAIMER (Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research). 2022. Available at https://www.faimer.org/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  10. Anand A. Attrition Rate and Reasons for Attrition in Medicals Schools Worldwide-an Analysis. Int J Basic Med Sci. 2018;3(1).

  11. Wang W. Medical education in China: progress in the past 70 years and a vision for the future. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:453. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02875-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harden RM. Editorial: Evolution or revolution and the future of medical education. Med Teach. 2000;22(435–442):22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Educational Commission of Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG®). 2022. Available at https://www.ecfmg.org/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  14. Stevens FCJ, Goulbourne JDS. Globalisation and the modernization of medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34:e684–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). 2022. Available at https://www.aamc.org/services/first-for-financial-aid-officers/lcme-accreditation. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  16. General Medical Council (GMC). 2022. Available at https://www.gmc-uk.org/about. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  17. Australian Medical Council (AMC). 2021. https://www.amc.org.au/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  18. Morgan J, Crooks VA, Snyder J. “We have been forced to move away from home”: print news coverage of Canadians studying abroad at Caribbean offshore medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. CAAM-HP. Caribbean Accreditation Authority for Education in Medicine and Other Health Professions. 2021. Available at https://www.caam-hp.org/programs. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  20. Ghaffar A, Zaidi S, Qureshi H, Hafeez A. Medical education and research in Pakistan The Lancet. 2013;381(9885):2234–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60146-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Public Education and Health-Mexico. 2019. Available at https://www.devex.com/organizations/ministry-of-public-education-mexico-31029. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  22. The University of Tartu Faculty of Medicine. 2022. https://meditsiiniteadused.ut.ee/enhttps://ut.ee/en/curriculum/medicine. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  23. Van Zanten M, Norcini J, Boulet J, Simon F. Overview of accreditation of undergraduate medical education programmes worldwide. BMC Med Educ. 2008;42:930–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geffen L. A brief history of medical education and training in Australia. Med J Aust. 2014;201(1):19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smallwood RA, Frank I, Walters T. The Australian Medical Council: beyond the first 25 years. Med J Aust 2010;193(10). https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb04061.x

  26. Eckhert NL, van Zanten, M. U.S.-Citizen International Medical Graduates — A Boon for the Workforce?. New England J Med. 2015;372:1686–87.

  27. van Zanten M, Boulet JR. Medical Education in the Caribbean. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):276–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c6cd3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smolentseva A. Trends in Public Demand for Higher Education in Russia: Sociological Analysis. Analytical report for a project “Trends in the public demand for higher education and estimation of economic consequences of restructurization of higher education in Russia” Program for Basic Research at National Research University – Higher School of Economics, 2012. Available at https://www.salzburgglobal.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documents/2010-2019/2012/495/Session_Document_AccesstoHigherEducation_495.pdf. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  29. Koppel A, Kahur K, Habicht T, Saar P, Habicht J, van Ginneken E. Estonia: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2008;10(1):1–230. ISSN 1817–6119 Vol. 10 No. 1.

  30. Latif MZ, Wajid G. Reforming Medical Education in Pakistan through strengthening Departments of Medical Education. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(6):1439–1444. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.346.15942

  31. Batool S, Raza MA, Khan RA. Roles of medical education department: What are expectations of the faculty? Pakistan J Med Sci. 2018;34(4):864–868. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.344.14609.

  32. Ono T, Schoenstein M, Buchan J. Geographic Imbalances in Doctor Supply and Policy Responses. OECD. 2014;69:65. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz5sq5ls1wl-en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Zanten M, Mckinley D, Durante Montiel I, Pijano CV. Medical education accreditation in Mexico and the Philippines: Impact on student outcomes. Med Educ. 2012;46:586–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. American College of Physicians. Available at https://www.acponline.org/. Accessed 01 Jun 2022.

  35. Alonso A, Mériγo-Azpiri CA. Quality of medical education in Mexico. The Lancet. 2004; 363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16114-X

  36. Song P, Jin C, Tang W. New medical education reform in China: Towards healthy China 2030. Biosci Trends. 2017;11:366–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liao K, Hou J, Yu C, Xie A, Wang W. Analysis on the enrolment scale of undergraduate medical education in China’s regular high institutions and related policy suggestions. Chinese Journal of Medical Education. 2020;40(4):252–3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. KPMG (Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler). The Future of Higher Education in a Disruptive World. 2020. Available at https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/10/future-of-higher-education.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2022.

  39. McGirr J, Seal A, Barnard A, Cheek C, Garne D, et al. The Australian Rural Clinical School (RCS) program supports rural medical workforce: evidence from a cross-sectional study of 12 RCSs. Rural Remote Health. 2019;19(1):4971–80.

    Google Scholar 

  40. DeZee KJ, Artino AR, Elnicki DM, Hemmer PA, Durning SJ. Medical education in the United States of America. Med Teach. 2012;34(7):521–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. American College of Osteopathic Medicine. Bethesda MD, USA. Available at: https://www.aacom.org/become-a-doctor/about-osteopathic-medicine. Accessed 31 Oct 2022.

  42. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1910. Bulletin No. 4. Boston, Updyke.

  43. Institute of International Education. Report on International Educational Exchange, Washington DC, November 15, 2021. Available at: https://opendoorsdata.org/annual-release/u-s-study-abroad/#download-data. Accessed 31 Oct 2022.

  44. Bleakley A, Brice J, Bligh J. Thinking the post-colonial in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42:266–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02991.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hodges BD, Maniate JM, Martimianakis MA, Alsuwaidan M, Segouin C. Cracks and crevices: Globalization discourse and medical education. Med Teach. 2009;31(10):910–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590802534932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gosselin K, Norris JL, Ho MJ. Beyond homogenization discourse: Reconsidering the cultural consequences of globalized medical education. Med Teach. 2016;38(7):691–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design and material preparation. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Diann Eley. Subsequent drafts were revised by Diann Eley and Claudio Cortez. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diann S. Eley.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This paper is a perspective where no data was collected, and ethics approval was not necessary.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eley, D.S., Cortes, C., Arja, S. et al. Perspectives on Medical Education in an Increasingly Globalized Society: Recognizing and Embracing Our Diversity. Med.Sci.Educ. 33, 247–254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01705-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01705-8

Keywords

Navigation