Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment for Deeper Understanding using Concept Maps: Lessons Learned from Flipped Teaching of Pharmacology

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To foster a deeper understanding of pharmacology concepts among physician assistant students, we integrated concept mapping into our flipped teaching to provide assessment for learning. Different mapping-based assessment strategies were adopted based on learner feedback, including in-person collaborative mapping, an individual computerized mapping-based quiz with automated feedback, and a collaborative computerized mapping-based quiz enhanced by the jigsaw strategy. Each mapping activity also leveraged the strength of a specific technology platform. Based on the findings from comparing learner ratings of these mapping activities and thematic analysis of learner feedback, we engaged in critical reflection and share our lessons learned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Kulasegaram K, Rangachari PK. Beyond “formative”: assessments to enrich student learning. Adv Physiol Educ. American Physiological Society; 2018;42:5–14.

  2. Swan Sein A, Rashid H, Meka J, Amiel J, Pluta W. Twelve tips for embedding assessment for and as learning practices in a programmatic assessment system. Med Teach Taylor & Francis. 2021;43:300–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High Educ Res Dev Routledge. 2015;34:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eachempati P, Ramnarayan K, KS K, Mayya A. Concept maps for teaching, training, testing and thinking [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 2020;9.

  5. Hartmeyer R, Stevenson MP, Bentsen P. A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education. Assess Educ Princ, Policy Pract Routledge. 2018;25:598–619.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Machado CT, Carvalho AA. Concept mapping: benefits and challenges in higher education. J Contin High Educ Routledge. 2020;68:38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang C-Y, Yang JC. Concept mapping in computer-supported learning environments: a bibliometric analysis. Interact Learn Environ Routledge. 2022;0:1–18.

  8. Jonassen DH. Modeling with technology: mindtools for conceptual change. 3rd ed. Pearson. 2005.

  9. Novak J, Cañas A. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps. Accessed 6 Oct 2022.

  10. Alt D, Naamati-Schneider L. Health management students’ self-regulation and digital concept mapping in online learning environments. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen W, Allen C, Jonassen D. Deeper learning in collaborative concept mapping: a mixed methods study of conflict resolution. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;87:424–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen W, Allen C. Concept mapping: providing assessment of, for, and as learning. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:149–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hung C-H, Lin C-Y. Using concept mapping to evaluate knowledge structure in problem-based learning. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinerth K, Koenig V, Brunner M, Martin R. Concept maps: a useful and usable tool for computer-based knowledge assessment? A literature review with a focus on usability. Comput Educ. 2014;78:201–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohles B, Backes S, Fischbach A, Amadieu F, Koenig V. Creating positive learning experiences with technology: a field study on the effects of user experience for digital concept mapping. Heliyon. 2022;8: e09246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen W. Knowledge convergence among pre-service mathematics teachers through online reciprocal peer feedback. Knowl Manag E-Learn An Int J. 2017;9:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cañas AJ, Novak JD, Vanhear J, Cañas AJ, Novak JD. Freedom vs. restriction of content and structure during concept mapping- possibilities and limitations for construction and assessment. Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology. Proc of the Fifth Int Conference on Concept Mapping. Valletta, Malta; 2012.

  18. Tom T. The jigsaw method teaching strategy [Internet]. TeachHUB. 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.teachhub.com/teaching-strategies/2016/10/the-jigsaw-method-teaching-strategy/

  19. Bhandari B, Mehta B, Mavai M, Singh YR, Singhal A. Jigsaw method: an innovative way of cooperative learning in physiology. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;7.

  20. Chen W, Noramly S. Nothing operates in isolation: learning biochemistry and physiology through drawing. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30:1749–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. De Leng B, Gijlers H. Collaborative diagramming during problem based learning in medical education: do computerized diagrams support basic science knowledge construction? Med Teach Eng. 2015;37:450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ Asse Eval Acc. 2009;21:5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leahy S, Lyon C, Thompson M, Wiliam D. Classroom assessment: minute by minute, day by day. Educ Leadersh. 2005;63:18–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weichao Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research at Baylor College of Medicine (H-50515).

Consent to Participate

All the participants provided informed consent for our use of their de-identified data for research.

Consent for Publication

The authors agree to the publication of this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Questionnaire

figure a

Identify one to three specific aspects about the concept mapping exercises that especially helped to support your learning. Write "N/A", if nothing helped support your learning.

Identify one to three specific aspects about the concept mapping exercises that could be improved to better support your learning. Write "N/A", if nothing needed to be improved upon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zagaar, M., Chen, W. Assessment for Deeper Understanding using Concept Maps: Lessons Learned from Flipped Teaching of Pharmacology. Med.Sci.Educ. 32, 1289–1297 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01653-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01653-3

Keywords

Navigation