Abstract
The role of information-processing strategies in defining individual attitudes toward decision-making has been little investigated and, in general, has almost always been explored via self-reported measures. This study investigates how different strategies for information processing are used to make decisions, via a new task based on realistic decision-making scenarios and observation of actual decisional behavior. Three levels of information processing are considered: (i) low-level information related to decision details; (ii) mid-level information concerning the task and the goals to be accomplished; (iii) high-level information including situational aspects and features of the context. General decision-making style questionnaire was also administered. Hierarchical cluster analysis parsed out three emerging profiles characterized by attention to low-level, mid-level, and high-level pieces of information, which was linked to detail-focused, task-oriented, and situation-aware approaches to gather and process information in supporting decision. Such emerging profiles also proved to differ in terms of primary general decision-making styles, a finding that depose in favor of the robustness of the latent classification. These findings allowed us to delineate a model in which different information-processing strategies provide the basis for identifying different profiles of decision-makers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angioletti L, Tormen F, Balconi M (2022) Judgment and embodied cognition of lawyers. Moral decision-making and interoceptive physiology in the legal field. Front Psychol 13:853342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853342
Balconi M (2023) Why a dynamic multicomponential model of decision making: some milestones and a preliminary tool. Neuropsychol Trends 33:9–16. https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2023-033-balm
Balconi M, Fronda G (2019) Physiological correlates of moral decision-making in the professional domain. Brain Sci 9(9):229. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9090229
Balconi M, Terenzi A (2012) Neuropsychology of moral judgment and risk seeking: what in common? A new look on emotional contribution to decision-making. In: Innocenti A, Sirigu A (eds) Neuroscience and the economics of decision-making. Routledge, pp 86–108
Balconi M, Crivelli D, Castiglioni C, Lozza E (2019) Social frame and tax compliance modulate electrophysiological and autonomic responses following tax-related decisions. Sci Rep 9:4713. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41156-7
Balconi M, Angioletti L, Crivelli D (2020) Neuro-empowerment of executive functions in the workplace: the reason why. Front Psychol 11:1519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01519
Balconi M, Acconito C, Allegretta RA, Crivelli D (2023) What is the relationship between metacognition and mental effort in executive functions? Contrib Neurophysiol Behav Sci 13(11):918. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110918
Bruch E, Feinberg F (2017) Decision-making processes in social contexts. Ann Rev Sociol 43(1):207–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622
Citroen CL (2011) The role of information in strategic decision-making. Int J Inf Manag 31(6):493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.005
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (II). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Corner PD, Kinicki AJ, Keats BW (1994) Integrating organizational and individual information processing perspectives on choice. Organ Sci 5(3):294–308. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.294
Crivelli D (2023) Assessing decision-making skills: preliminary proof-of-concept data for DAssDec—Mod1STY and Mod2STR. Neuropsychol Trends 33:67–81. https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2023-033-criv
Crivelli D, Balconi M (2017) Agentività e competenze sociali: riflessioni teoriche e implicazioni per il management [Agency and social skills: theoretical remarks and implications for management]. Ric Psicol 40(3):349–363. https://doi.org/10.3280/RIP2017-003006
Crivelli D, Balconi M (2022) Neuroassessment in sports: an integrative approach for performance and potential evaluation in athletes. Front Psychol 13:747852. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.747852
Crivelli D, Balconi M (2023) Shared emotions, interpersonal syntonization, and group decision-making: a multi-agent perspective. Front Neurosci 17:1251855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1251855
Crivelli D, Allegretta RA, Balconi M (2023) The “status quo bias” in response to external feedback in decision-makers. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 9(4):426–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00230-1
Curşeu PL, Schruijer SGL (2012) Decision styles and rationality: an analysis of the predictive validity of the general decision-making style inventory. Educ Psychol Meas 72(6):1053–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412448066
Dolnicar S (2002) A review of unquestioned standards in using cluster analysis for data-driven market segmentation. Fac Commerce-Pap 273:1–9
Formann AK (1984) Die latent-class-analyse: einführung in die theorie und anwendung. Beltz
Gambetti E, Fabbri M, Bensi L, Tonetti L (2008) A contribution to the Italian validation of the general decision-making style inventory. Personal Individ Differ 44(4):842–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.017
Guo KL (2008) DECIDE: a decision-making model for more effective decision making by health care managers. Health Prog 27(2):118–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HCM.0000285046.27290.90
Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment: managing differential and integration. Harvard University Press
Loo R (2000) A psychometric evaluation of the general decision-making style inventory. Personal Individ Differ 29(5):895–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00241-X
Massaro DW, Cowan N (1993) Information processing models: microscopes of the mind. Annu Rev Psychol 44(1):383–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.002123
Melnyk V, Carrillat FA, Melnyk V (2022) The influence of social norms on consumer behavior: a meta-analysis. J Mark 86(3):98–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211029199
Sali AW, Anderson BA, Courtney SM (2018) Information processing biases in the brain: implications for decision-making and self-governance. Neuroethics 11(3):259–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9251-1
Schwartz B, Ward A, Monterosso J, Lyubomirsky S, White K, Lehman DR (2002) Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. J Pers Soc Psychol 83(5):1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
Scott SG, Bruce RA (1995) Decision-making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educ Psychol Meas 55(5):818–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017
Spicer DP, Sadler-Smith E (2005) An examination of the General Decision Making Style questionnaire in two UK samples. J Manag Psychol 20(2):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579777
Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill
Thunholm P (2004) Decision-making style: habit, style or both? Personal Individ Differ 36(4):931–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00162-4
Vanutelli ME, Meroni F, Fronda G, Balconi M, Lucchiari C (2020) Gender differences and unfairness processing during economic and moral decision-making: a fNIRS study. Brain Sci 10(9):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090647
Wiggins MW, Bollwerk S (2006) Heuristic-based information acquisition and decision making among pilots. Hum Factors 48(4):734–746. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872006779166325
Yechiam E, Aharon I (2012) Experience-based decisions and brain activity: three new gaps and partial answers. Front Psychol 2:390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00390
Funding
No external financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Crivelli, D., Acconito, C. & Balconi, M. What happens to information, situational cues, and individual strategies in decision-making? The contribution of latent decisional profiles in realistic decisions. Decision (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-024-00374-3
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-024-00374-3