Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic capabilities and responsiveness: moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism

  • Research Article
  • Published:
DECISION Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resource-based view suggests that dynamic capability is a very powerful resource to improve the firm’s responsiveness in the fast-changing environment. Additionally, organization structures may decrease or increase the effect of dynamic capabilities by providing greater or lesser opportunities. Consequently, this study examines the direct impact of dynamic capabilities on the firm’s responsiveness as well as the moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism on the dynamic capabilities–responsiveness relationship. Using the moderated hierarchical regression method, we analyzed 217 data points collected from Indian service companies to test our hypotheses. The findings suggest that dimensions of dynamic capability: sensing, learning, integration, and reconfiguration capability have significant positive impact on the firm’s responsiveness. The statistical results also suggest that the dynamic capabilities–responsiveness relationship is moderated by the organization structures and environmental dynamism. Moderation results explain that the firm responsiveness is expected to improve if (1) they have strong sensing capability and adopt a less formalized organization structure; (2) they have strong learning capability and a more centralized organization structure; (3) they have a high level of reconfiguration capability and adopt a less specialized organization structure; and (4) they deal with a highly dynamic environment and have a strong sensing capability. The originality of the study lies in exploring the internal alignment with organization structures and external fit with environmental dynamism on the relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm’s responsiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal R, Selen W (2009) Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation. Decis Sci 40(3):431–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright KS (2004) Environmental scanning: radar for success. Inf Manag J 38(3):38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini V, Bowman C (2009) What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? Int J Manag Rev 11(1):29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14(1):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews R (2010) Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Hum Relat 63(5):583–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14:396–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Asree S, Zain M, Rizal Razalli M (2010) Influence of leadership competency and organizational culture on responsiveness and performance of firms. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 22(4):500–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG (2000) The paradox of success: an archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad Manag J 43(5):837–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Augier M, Teece DJ (2008) Strategy as evolution with design: the foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organ Stud 29(8–9):1187–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Augier M, Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ Sci 20(2):410–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Babelytė-Labanauskė K, Nedzinskas Š (2017) Dynamic capabilities and their impact on research organizations’ R&D and innovation performance. J Model Manag 12(4):603–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán-Martín I, Roca-Puig V, Escrig-Tena A, Bou-Llusar JC (2008) Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. J Manag 34(5):1009–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua M, Ciarapica FE, De Sanctis I (2017) Lean practices implementation and their relationships with operational responsiveness and company performance: an Italian study. Int J Prod Res 55(3):769–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Blome C, Schoenherr T, Rexhausen D (2013) Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Int J Prod Res 51(4):1295–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer KK, Lewis MW (2002) Competitive priorities: investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Prod Oper Manag 11(1):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush PD (1987) The theory of institutional change. J Econ Issues 21(3):1075–1116

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron L, Mitchell W (2009) Selection capability: how capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organ Sci 20(2):294–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang L-C, Ho W-L, Tsai S-B, Chen Q, Wu C-C (2017) Dynamic organizational learning: a narrative inquiry into the story of Huawei in China. Asia Pac Bus Rev 23(4):541–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi TY, Krause DR (2006) The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. J Oper Manag 24(5):637–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (1983) Applied multiple regression. Correl Anal Behav Sci 2:255–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL, Sormunen J, Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: an empirical study. Strateg Manag J 9(2):123–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Todor WD, Spendolini MJ, Fielding GJ, Porter LW (1980) Organization structure and performance: a critical review. Acad Manag Rev 5(1):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Day GS (1994) The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J Mark 58:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JW Jr, Snell SA (1991) Integrated manufacturing and job design: moderating effects of organizational inertia. Acad Manag J 34(4):776–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Adm Sci Q 29(1):52–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwayne Whitten G, Green KW Jr, Zelbst PJ (2012) Triple-A supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32(1):28–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg Manag J 21:1105–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Elenkov DS (1997) Strategic uncertainty and environmental scanning: the case for institutional influences on scanning behavior. Strateg Manag J 18(4):287–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson T (2014) Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Scand J Manag 30(1):65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strateg Manag J 19(12):1193–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran A, Lai K, Cheng TCE (2008) Responsive supply chain: a competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega 36(4):549–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez-Gutierrez LJ, Barrales-Molina V, Kaynak H (2018) The role of human resource-related quality management practices in new product development: a dynamic capability perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38(1):43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC (1982) Environmental scanning and organizational strategy. Strateg Manag J 3(2):159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen BT, Bradley RV, Bell JE, In J, Byrd TA (2017) Enterprise architecture: a competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 193:566–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manag J 24(10):997–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat CE, Winter SG (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (N) ever-changing world. Strateg Manag J 32(11):1243–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg C, Grozdanovic M, Klarmann M (2007) Responsiveness to customers and competitors: the role of affective and cognitive organizational systems. J Mark 71(3):18–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Johnson RA, Moesel DD (1993) Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strateg Manag J14(3):215–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52(11):1661–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen A, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S, Kyläheiko K (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. J Int Entrep 3(3):223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju K-J, Park B, Kim T (2016) Causal relationship between supply chain dynamic capabilities, technological innovation, and operational performance. Manag Prod Eng Rev 7(4):6–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Shin B, Kim KK, Lee HG (2011) IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. J Assoc Inf Syst 12(7):487

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff BA (1994) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism: the economics of business firm formation and growth. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon SJ, Ryu D, Park E (2018) The influence of entrepreneurs’strategic agility and dynamic capability on the opportunity pursuit process of new ventures: evidence from South Korea. Acad Strateg Manag J 17(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL (2004) The triple-A supply chain. Harv Bus Rev 82(10):102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KL, Low GT (2016) Leadership styles and organisational citizenship behaviour: role ambiguity as a mediating construct. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 24(4):1557–1577

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengnick-Hall CA, Beck TE, Lengnick-Hall ML (2011) Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev 21(3):243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao J, Welsch H, Stoica M (2003) Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: an empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs. Entrep Theory Pract 28(1):63–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Wu L-Y (2014) Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. J Bus Res 67(3):407–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen H, Pohjola M, Olkkonen R, Koponen A (2014) Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. J Bus Res 67(1):2707–2719

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Sánchez A, Pérez Pérez M (2005) Supply chain flexibility and firm performance: a conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(7):681–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GJ, Smith RW (1993) Managerial dilemmas: the political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbert SL, Gopalakrishnan S, Kirchhoff BA (2008) Looking beyond resources: exploring the importance of entrepreneurship to firm-level competitive advantage in technologically intensive industries. Technovation 28(1–2):6–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieves J, Quintana A, Osorio J (2016) Organizational knowledge, dynamic capabilities and innovation in the hotel industry. Tour Hosp Res 16(2):158–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolsøe Grünbaum N, Stenger M (2013) Dynamic capabilities: Do they lead to innovation performance and profitability? IUP J Bus Strategy 10(4):68–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory (McGraw-Hill series in psychology). McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan G, Pan S-L, Lim C-Y (2015) Examining how firms leverage IT to achieve firm productivity: RBV and dynamic capabilities perspectives. Inf Manag 52(4):401–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel PC, Terjesen S, Li D (2012) Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity. J Oper Manag 30(3):201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2011) Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decis Sci 42(1):239–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RL, Mansfield R (1973) Relationships of perceptions of organizational climate to organizational structure, context, and hierarchical position. Adm Sci Q 18(4):515–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson T, Ghannad N, Pehrsson A, Abt T, Chen S, Erath F, Hammarstig T (2015) Dynamic capabilities and performance in foreign markets: developments within international new ventures. J Int Entrep 13(1):28–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA, Barney JB (2003) Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Manag Decis Econ 24(4):309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinho JC, Prange C (2016) The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance. J World Bus 51(3):391–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu Rev Psychol 63:539–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Creating and sustaining superior performance. Compet Advant 167:33–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo DI (2016) The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. Int J Prod Econ 171:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JW, Zeckhauser R, Arrow KJ (1985) Principals and agents: the structure of business. Harvard Business Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran T (2000) Swiftness and intensity of administrative innovation adoption: an empirical study of TQM in information systems. Decis Sci 31(3):691–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray S, Cardozo R (1996) Sensitivity and creativity in entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: a framework for empirical investigation. In: Sixth global entrepreneurship research conference, Imperial College, London

  • Richard H, Tolbert P (2005) Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo JR, House RJ, Lirtzman SI (1970) Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Adm Sci Q 15(2):150–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington DEM (1991) Incentives in principal-agent relationships. J Econ Perspect 5(2):45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Coelho DM, Maroco J (2016) Strategic orientations, dynamic capabilities, and firm performance: an analysis for knowledge intensive business services. J Knowl Econ 7(4):1000–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strateg Manag J 35(2):179–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilke O, Hu S, Helfat CE (2018) Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Acad Manag Ann 12(1):390–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Acad Manag Rev 32(1):273–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalk G (1988) Time-the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Bus Rev 66:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Su H, Linderman K (2016) An empirical investigation in sustaining high-quality performance. Decis Sci 47:787–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Swink M, Narasimhan R, Kim SW (2005) Manufacturing practices and strategy integration: effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market-based performance. Decis Sci 36(3):427–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallott M, Hilliard R (2016) Developing dynamic capabilities for learning and internationalization: a case study of diversification in an SME. Baltic J Manag 11(3):328–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2014) The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Acad Manag Perspect 28(4):328–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang N, Qu H (2000) Service quality in China’s hotel industry: a perspective from tourists and hotel managers. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 12(5):316–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Verona G, Ravasi D (2003) Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Ind Corp Change 12(3):577–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2007) Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):31–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous JP, Hudy MJ (2001) Single-item reliability: a replication and extension. Organ Res Methods 4(4):361–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb D, Pettigrew A (1999) The temporal development of strategy: Patterns in the UK insurance industry. Organ Sci 10(5):601–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei YS, Wang Q (2011) Making sense of a market information system for superior performance: the roles of organizational responsiveness and innovation strategy. Ind Mark Manag 40(2):267–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Will M (2019) Organizational structures for Tech Firms.  In: Mellor R (ed) Management for Scientists. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 49–64 

  • Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24(10):991–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu SJ, Melnyk SA, Flynn BB (2010) Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient. Decis Sci 41(4):721–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu TF (2001) Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm. Int J Manag Rev 3(3):185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Zhang W, Du J (2011) Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. J Knowl Manag 15(6):1035–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strateg Manag J 31(5):547–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag 22(3):265–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Operations Management Area, Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru (Abhanpur), Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 493661, India

    Ritu Singh & Parikshit Charan

  2. Decision Science and Systems Area, Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru (Abhanpur), Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 493661, India

    Manojit Chattopadhyay

Authors
  1. Ritu Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Parikshit Charan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manojit Chattopadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritu Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, R., Charan, P. & Chattopadhyay, M. Dynamic capabilities and responsiveness: moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism. Decision 46, 301–319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-019-00227-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-019-00227-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation