Abstract
Probing dry weight (DW) was largely dependent on clinical subjective estimate until recently. New bedside non-invasive tools have been developed with the aim of providing more objective information on volume status and guiding physicians in the quest for DW. Among them, bioimpedance appears to be very promising in the achievement of this goal. We have developed a test aimed to assess DW in complicated hemodialysis (HD) patients and named it “RE.sistance S.tabilization T.est” (RE.S.T.). It is based on the following four items:
-
1.
one or more HD sessions lasting 6 h with ultrafiltration (UF) rate ≤0.5 kg/h are planned;
-
2.
bioimpedance measurements are determined injecting 800 μA at 50 kHz alternating sinusoidal current with a standard tetrapolar technique. Resistance (R) is recorded at the start of the treatment (R0) and every 15 min (Rt) during HD until the end of the 6-h session;
-
3.
DW is defined as that achieved at the time point at which three consecutive R0/Rt ratios show in-between changes ±1 % despite ongoing UF;
-
4.
if at the end of the 6-h HD session R stabilization is not attained, a new 6-h HD treatment with UF rate ≤0.5 kg/h is planned until a bioimpedance DW (according to the item 3) is obtained.
As said, we are applying RE.S.T. to assess DW in complicated HD patients. Here we report a paradigmatic case which illustrates quite brilliantly its clinical usefulness. The patient was admitted to our nephrology ward with a hypertensive crisis, a very large drug regimen notwithstanding. His DW was reduced by 5 kg after four 6-h HD sessions probing his DW by means of RE.S.T. He was discharged with a normal blood pressure and no need for anti-hypertensive drugs. In conclusion, RE.S.T. appears to be a (the) brilliant solution in solving the old problem of DW in HD patients.


References
Charra B, Calemard R, Ruffet M et al (1992) Survival as an index of adequacy of dialysis. Kidney Int 41:1286–1291
Hecking M, Karaboyas A, Antlanger M et al (2013) Significance of interdialytic weight gain versus chronic volume overload: consensus opinion. Am J Nephrol 38:78–90
Piccoli A (1998) Identification of operational clues to dry weight prescription in hemodialysis using bioimpedance vector analysis. The Italian Hemodialysis-Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (HD-BIA) Study Group. Kidney Int 53:1036–1043
Chamney PW, Wabel P, Moissl UM et al (2007) A whole-body model to distinguish excess fluid from the hydration of major body tissues. Am J Clin Nutr 85:80–89
Zhu F, Kuhlmann MK, Sarkar S et al (2004) Adjustment of dry weight in hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance of the calf. Int J Artif Organs 27:104–109
Levin NW, Zhu F, Seibert E et al (2005) Use of segmental multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis. In: Ronco C, Brendolan A, Levin NW (eds) Contrib Nephrol, vol 149. Karger, Basel, pp 162–167
Zhu F, Zhu F, Kuhlmann MK, Kotanko P et al (2008) A method for the estimation of hydration state during hemodialysis using a calf bioimpedance technique. Physiol Meas 29:S503–S516
Liu L, Zhu F, Raimann JG et al (2012) Determination of fluid status in haemodialysis patients with whole body and calf bioimpedance techniques. Nephrology 17:131–140
Chongthanakorn K, Tiranathanagul K, Susantitaphong P et al (2009) Effective determination of dry weight by intradialytic bioimpedance analysis in hemodialysis. Blood Purif 27:235–241
Chertow GM, Lowrie EG, Wilmore DW et al (1995) Nutritional assessment with bioelectrical bioimpedance analysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:75–81
Piccoli A, Pastori G, Guizzo M et al (2005) Equivalence of information from single versus multiple frequency bioimpedance vector analysis in hemodialysis. Kidney Int 67:301–313
Piccoli A, Pillon L, Dumler F (2002) Impedance vector distribution by sex, race, body mass index, and age in the United States: standard reference intervals as bivariate Z scores. Nutrition 18:153–167
Piccoli A (2014) Estimation of fluid volumes in hemodialysis patients: comparing bioimpedance with isotopic and dilution methods. Kidney Int 85:738–741
Hoenich NA, Levin NW (2003) Can technology solve the clinical problem of ‘dry weight’? Nephrol Dial Transpl 18:647–650
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest is declared by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basile, C., Libutti, P., Lisi, P. et al. Probing the dry weight by bioimpedance: the resistance stabilization test. J Nephrol 28, 517–520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0159-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0159-8