Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

GSTP1 gene methylation and AHR rs2066853 variant predict resistance to first generation somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Biomarkers of clinical and therapeutic outcome in acromegaly are needed. Polymorphisms or epigenetic changes of detoxification genes, such as those coding for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and the glutathione-S-transferase-P1 (GSTP1), could have a role in GH secreting pituitary tumors’ pathophysiology and clinical expression. In this study, we assessed the contribution of GSTP1 gene promoter methylation status, per se or in combination with the occurrence of the AHR gene rs2066853 variant, on clinical features and response to somatostatin analogs (SSA) treatment in acromegaly patients.

Methods

This is an observational, retrospective study, carried out in the Endocrine Unit of an Italian University Hospital. We enrolled 77 wild-type AIP gene acromegaly patients, who have been screened for germline AHR rs2066853 variant and GSTP1 gene promoter methylation. Clinical and biochemical parameters were compared after patients’ stratification according to GSTP1 methylation status and the presence of AHR rs2066853. We also evaluated the response to SSA treatment in 71 cases.

Results

17 patients carried the AHR rs2066853 variant and 26 had methylated GSTP1 (GSTP1-methyl) gene promoter. GSTP1-methyl patients showed a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.01), colonic polyps (p = 0.05), and were more resistant to SSA (p = 0.02) as compared to GSTP1 unmethylated patients (GSTP1-unmethyl). Patients GSTP1-unmethyl and AHR wild-type were the most sensitive to SSA treatment, while those with both GSTP1-methyl and AHR rs2066853 variant were all resistant to SSA (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

In acromegaly, GSTP1 gene methylation associates with resistance to SSA treatment, especially in patients carrying also the AHR rs2066853 variant, and with increased prevalence of colonic polyps and diabetes mellitus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Capatina C, Wass JA (2015) 60 years of neuroendocrinology: acromegaly. J Endocrinol 226(2):T141–T160. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pivonello R, Auriemma RS, Grasso LF, Pivonello C, Simeoli C, Patalano R, Galdiero M, Colao A (2017) Complications of acromegaly: cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic comorbidities. Pituitary 20(1):46–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0797-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Terzolo M, Reimondo G, Berchialla P, Ferrante E, Malchiodi E, De Marinis L, Pivonello R, Grottoli S, Losa M, Cannavo S, Ferone D, Montini M, Bondanelli M, De Menis E, Martini C, Puxeddu E, Velardo A, Peri A, Faustini-Fustini M, Tita P, Pigliaru F, Peraga G, Borretta G, Scaroni C, Bazzoni N, Bianchi A, Berton A, Serban AL, Baldelli R, Fatti LM, Colao A, Arosio M, Italian Study Group of Acromegaly (2017) Acromegaly is associated with increased cancer risk: a survey in Italy. Endocr Relat Cancer 24(9):495–504. https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-16-0553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giustina A, Chanson P, Kleinberg D, Bronstein MD, Clemmons DR, Klibanski A, van der Lely AJ, Strasburger CJ, Lamberts SW, Ho KK, Casanueva FF, Melmed S, Acromegaly Consensus Group (2014) Expert consensus document: a consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(4):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giustina A, Arnaldi G, Bogazzi F, Cannavo S, Colao A, De Marinis L, De Menis E, Degli Uberti E, Giorgino F, Grottoli S, Lania AG, Maffei P, Pivonello R, Ghigo E (2017) Pegvisomant in acromegaly: an update. J Endocrinol Invest 40(6):577–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0614-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Maffezzoni F, Formenti AM, Mazziotti G, Frara S, Giustina A (2016) Current and future medical treatments for patients with acromegaly. Expert Opin Pharmacother 17(12):1631–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2016.1199687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paragliola RM, Corsello SM, Salvatori R (2017) Somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: clinical response and factors predicting resistance. Pituitary 20(1):109–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-016-0768-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kasuki L, Wildemberg LE, Gadelha MR (2018) Management of endocrine disease: personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 178(3):R89–R100. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cannavo S, Ragonese M, Puglisi S, Romeo PD, Torre ML, Alibrandi A, Scaroni C, Occhi G, Ceccato F, Regazzo D, De Menis E, Sartorato P, Arnaldi G, Trementino L, Trimarchi F, Ferrau F (2016) Acromegaly is more severe in patients with AHR or AIP gene variants living in highly polluted areas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(4):1872–1879. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibanez-Costa A, Korbonits M (2017) AIP and the somatostatin system in pituitary tumours. J Endocrinol 235(3):R101–R116. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-17-0254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannavo S, Ferrau F, Ragonese M, Romeo PD, Torre ML, Puglisi S, De Menis E, Arnaldi G, Salpietro C, Cotta OR, Albani A, Ruggeri RM, Trimarchi F (2014) Increased frequency of the rs2066853 variant of aryl hydrocarbon receptor gene in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 81(2):249–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolinski K, Stangierski A, Dyrda K, Nowicka K, Pelka M, Iqbal A, Car A, Lazizi M, Bednarek N, Czarnywojtek A, Gurgul E, Ruchala M (2017) Risk of malignant neoplasms in acromegaly: a case-control study. J Endocrinol Invest 40(3):319–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0565-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schnekenburger M, Karius T, Diederich M (2014) Regulation of epigenetic traits of the glutathione S-transferase P1 gene: from detoxification toward cancer prevention and diagnosis. Front Pharmacol 5:170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan Y, Qian ZR, Sano T, Asa SL, Yamada S, Kagawa N, Kudo E (2008) Reduction of GSTP1 expression by DNA methylation correlates with clinicopathological features in pituitary adenomas. Mod Pathol 21(7):856–865. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2008.60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA, Endocrine S (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(11):3933–3951. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrau F, Romeo PD, Puglisi S, Ragonese M, Torre ML, Scaroni C, Occhi G, De Menis E, Arnaldi G, Trimarchi F, Cannavo S (2016) Analysis of GPR101 and AIP genes mutations in acromegaly: a multicentric study. Endocrine 54(3):762–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-0862-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boguszewski CL, Ayuk J (2016) Management of endocrine disease: acromegaly and cancer: an old debate revisited. Eur J Endocrinol 175(4):R147–R156. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cannavo S, Condurso R, Ragonese M, Ferrau F, Alibrandi A, Arico I, Romanello G, Squadrito S, Trimarchi F, Silvestri R (2011) Increased prevalence of restless legs syndrome in patients with acromegaly and effects on quality of life assessed by Acro-QoL. Pituitary 14(4):328–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0298-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ragonese M, Alibrandi A, Di Bella G, Salamone I, Puglisi S, Cotta OR, Torre ML, Ferrau F, Ruggeri RM, Trimarchi F, Cannavo S (2014) Cardiovascular events in acromegaly: distinct role of Agatston and Framingham score in the 5-year prediction. Endocrine 47(1):206–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-013-0115-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cannavo S, Trimarchi F, Ferrau F (2017) Acromegaly, genetic variants of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and environmental burden. Mol Cell Endocrinol 457:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2016.12.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Formosa R, Borg J, Vassallo J (2017) Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a potential tumour suppressor in pituitary adenomas. Endocr Relat Cancer 24(8):445–457. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Formosa R, Vassallo J (2017) The complex biology of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and its role in the pituitary gland. Horm Cancer 8(4):197–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-017-0300-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietrich C, Kaina B (2010) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in the regulation of cell-cell contact and tumor growth. Carcinogenesis 31(8):1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgq028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Feng S, Cao Z, Wang X (1836) Role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2:197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2013.05.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Daly AF, Beckers A (2017) The role of AIP mutations in pituitary adenomas: 10 years on. Endocrine 55(2):333–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1194-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernandez-Ramirez LC, Gabrovska P, Denes J, Stals K, Trivellin G, Tilley D, Ferrau F, Evanson J, Ellard S, Grossman AB, Roncaroli F, Gadelha MR, Korbonits M, International FIPA Consortium (2015) Landscape of familial isolated and young-onset pituitary adenomas: prospective diagnosis in AIP mutation carriers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(9):E1242–E1254. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang ST, Wang CJ, Tang HQ, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2013) Evaluation of glutathione S-transferase genetic variants affecting type 2 diabetes susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Gene 530(2):301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen X, Wang J, Yan X, Ren X, Wang F, Chen X, Xu Y (2016) Predictive value of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism in clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in gastric and colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77(6):1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3047-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has been supported by a grant of the Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2015, Prot. 2015ZHKFTA) and of the Ministry of Health (Progetto Ordinario Ricerca Finalizzata RF-2013-02356201) of the Italian Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Ferraù.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferraù, F., Romeo, P.D., Puglisi, S. et al. GSTP1 gene methylation and AHR rs2066853 variant predict resistance to first generation somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest 42, 825–831 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0988-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0988-8

Keywords

Navigation