Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Psychiatry Clerkship Orientation Based on Bite-Sized Teaching and Chalk Talks

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Chalk talks are a subtype of bite-sized teaching with potential benefits over conventional teaching methods, including their use of visuals, adaptability, and potential to be more engaging. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an orientation curriculum for medical students during the psychiatry clerkship based on bite-sized teaching and chalk talks.

Methods

A series of brief (10 min) lectures were developed covering fundamental skills in psychiatry, including psychiatric interview, mental status exam, and differential diagnosis. Talks were presented to medical students by the study author on the first day of their psychiatry clerkship in 60-min group educational sessions with 10–15 students per group. Data was gathered in pre- and post-session surveys that measured response to 4 knowledge-based questions on mental status exam terminology, 3 questions assessing confidence in completing skills associated with the talks, and 3 questions assessing beliefs regarding these skills.

Results

Fifty-six medical students participated in the educational sessions and completed pre- and post-session surveys. Students showed significant improvement from pre- to post-session in answering knowledge questions and perceived confidence in all skills, and indicated significant change in their beliefs regarding these topics.

Conclusions

Although this is a small study without a control group, the results provide initial evidence that approaches to teaching foundational psychiatry topics based on bite-sized teaching and chalk talks may be an acceptable and more time-efficient alternative to a traditional lecture-based curriculum, and can produce significant changes in knowledge and attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AJH, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Obermeyer Z, Lee TH. Lost in thought: the limits of the human mind and the future of medicine. New Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill MR, Goicochea S, Merlo LJ. In their own words: stressors facing medical students in the millennial generation. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1530558.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Thornby KA, Brazeau GA, Chen AM. Reducing student workload through curricular efficiency. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023;87(8):100015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, Shapiro M, Wang E, Mayer RE, et al. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):818–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44(6):543–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambrose SA, Bridges MW, DiPietro M, Lovett MC, Norman MK. How learning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kadiyala PK. Mnemonics for diagnostic criteria of DSM V mental disorders: a scoping review. Gen Psychiatry. 2020;33(3):e100109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Gagne JC, Park HK, Hall K, Woodward A, Yamane S, Kim SS. Microlearning in health professions education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(2):e13997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazlan CA, Abdullah MH, Sulong MA, Abas A, Ramdan MR, Safian AR, et al. Exploring the integration of bite-sized learning: a scoping review of research in education and related disciplines. Cont Educ Technol. 2023;15(4):ep468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manning KD, Spicer JO, Golub L, Akbashev M, Klein R. The micro revolution: effect of bite-sized teaching (BST) on learner engagement and learning in postgraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartz AC, Cotes RO, Kim J, Ward MC, Manning KD. Bite-sized teaching: engaging the modern learner in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43:315–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stahl SM, Davis RL, Kim DH, Lowe NG, Carlson RE, Fountain K, et al. Play it again: the master psychopharmacology program as an example of interval learning in bite-sized portions. CNS Spectr. 2010;15(8):491–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger GN, Kritek PA. How to give a great “chalk talk.” In: Mookherjee S, Cosgrove EM, editors. Handbook of clinical teaching. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 77–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Cawkwell PB, Jaffee EG, Frederick D, Gerken AT, Vestal HS, Stoklosa J. Empowering clinician-educators with chalk talk teaching scripts. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43:447–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper AZ, Rodman A, Simpson D. Visual media in medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(3):417–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts JK, Chudgar SM, Engle D, McClain EK, Jakoi E, Berkoben M, et al. Digital chalk-talk videos improve knowledge and satisfaction in renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018;42:146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu JH, Gruppuso PA, Adashi EY. The self-directed medical student curriculum. JAMA. 2021;326(20):2005–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Tackett SA, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin A, Jacobs A, Krause R, Amsalem D. The mental status exam: an online teaching exercise using video-based depictions by simulated patients. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA

    Alexander J. Hish

Authors
  1. Alexander J. Hish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander J. Hish.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hish, A.J. A Psychiatry Clerkship Orientation Based on Bite-Sized Teaching and Chalk Talks. Acad Psychiatry 49, 56–59 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-02010-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-02010-9

Keywords