Abstract
Introduction
The detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is crucial in the etiological study of an acute ischemic stroke (AIS), although this type of arrhythmia is often under-diagnosed. This prospective study aims to (1) evaluate the new-onset PAF detection rate among elderly patients with AIS in an acute setting, and (2) to assess the applicability of the STAF score (Score for the Targeting of Atrial Fibrillation) for such patients.
Methodology
An observational and prospective study was performed over a period of 11 months. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had been admitted to the stroke unit were included. Exclusion criteria included prior AF, AF readings on ECG during admission, or stroke mimic. The patients were monitored with a bedside ECG monitor throughout the first 48 h, then simultaneously with an extended Holter recorder for a maximum of 6 days. The occurrence and duration of PAF events was evaluated. The STAF risk score for PAF was calculated and compared to the detection rate of PAF for each patient.
Results
The sample population consisted of 67 patients, whose median age was 76 years (IQR 71–84) and who were 57% males. The median duration of Holter recording was 3.5 days per patient (IQR 2–5). We detected new PAF cases in 16% of patients, and a total of 31% had supraventricular arrhythmia episodes lasting 10 s or longer. Among the patients in which this arrhythmia was detected, 10% had it detected by the bedside ECG monitor in the first 48 h. The median risk score was 5 (IQR 4–6). There was no association between the risk score used and PAF.
Conclusion
In elderly patients with AIS, the use of an extended Holter recorder led to the detection of more cases of PAF, offering them the chance to initiate hypocoagulant therapy. Among this population, the STAF score was non-discriminative and did not prove useful in predicting PAF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weber-Krüger M, Gelbrich G, Stahrenberg R et al (2014) Finding atrial fibrillation in stroke patients: randomized evaluation of enhanced and prolonged Holter monitoring–Find-AF(RANDOMISED)—rationale and design. Am Heart J 168:438–445
Kishore A, Vail A, Majid A et al (2014) Detection of atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 45:520–526
Rabinstein AA (2014) Prolonged cardiac monitoring for detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after cerebral ischemia. Stroke 45:1208–1214
Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P et al (2014) Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 370:2467–2477
Andrade JG, Field T, Khairy P (2015) Detection of occult atrial fibrillation in patients with embolic stroke of uncertain source: a work in progress. Front Physiol 6:100
Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr et al (2013) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 44:870–947
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee; ESO Writing Committee (2008) Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 25:457–507
Grond M, Jauss M, Hamann G et al (2013) Improved detection of silent atrial fibrillation using 72-hour Holter ECG in patients with ischemic stroke: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Stroke 44:3357–3364
Charitos EI, Stierle U, Ziegler PD, Baldewig M, Robinson DR, Sievers HH, Hanke T (2012) A comprehensive evaluation of rhythm monitoring strategies for the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from 647 continuously monitored patients and implications for monitoring after therapeutic interventions. Circulation 126:806–814
Stahrenberg R, Weber-Krüger M, Seegers J et al (2010) Enhanced detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by early and prolonged continuous Holter monitoring in patients with cerebral ischemia presenting in sinus rhythm. Stroke 41:2884–2888
Suissa L, Bertora D, Lachaud S et al (2009) Score for the targeting of atrial fibrillation (STAF): a new approach to the detection of atrial fibrillation in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. Stroke 40:2866–2868
Glotzer TV, Daoud EG, Wyse DG et al (2009) The relationship between daily atrial tachyarrhythmia burden from implantable device diagnostics and stroke risk: The TRENDS study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2:474–480
Hariri E, Hachem A, Sarkis G et al (2016) Optimal duration of monitoring for atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: a nonsystematic review. Biomed Res Int 2016:5704963
Bridge F, Thijs V (2016) How and when to screen for atrial fibrillation after stroke: insights from insertable cardiac monitoring devices. J Stroke 18:121–128
Toyoda K, Okumura K, Hashimoto Y et al (2016) Identification of covert atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke: current clinical practice in Japan. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 25:1829–1837
Wachter R, Weber-Krüger M, Seegers J et al (2013) Age-dependent yield of screening for undetected atrial fibrillation in stroke patients: the Find-AF study. J Neurol 260:2042–2045
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to publicly thank nurses Sandra Gaspar and Cristina Morais for their collaboration in the collection of the data used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any experimental procedure with human participants or animals. All exams performed were done in routine clinical practice.
Informed consent
All participants provided informed consent to do routine clinical exams during their stay in the hospital.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alves, M., Narciso, M.R., Cruz, J. et al. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation detection in patients with acute ischemic stroke through prolonged Holter: prospective study. Aging Clin Exp Res 31, 469–474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-1014-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-1014-x