Skip to main content
Log in

Variations in morpho-physiological and yield attributes of kabuli chickpea genotypes in relation to seed size

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present study was undertaken with three categories of seed size of Kabuli chickpea genotypes. Leaf characteristics, viz., number of leaves, leaf area, leaf area index, and specific leaf weight were high in large-seeded category genotypes than other two seed size category genotypes during reproductive phase of plant growth and development. Photosynthetic rate, biomass accumulation was also higher in large-seeded category. Phenological parameters such as days to flower initiation and days to pod initiation were earlier in large-seeded category genotypes, while pods maturity was late in large-seeded category than in medium-and small-seeded category. However, mean number of flowers plant−1 was higher in medium-seeded category than in small-and large-seeded categories. Yield contributing parameters at harvest viz., per cent filled pods, number of seeds plant−1, number of pods plant−1, 100-seed weight, partitioning coefficient, harvest index and yield were greatly affected by seed sizes. On the basis of varietal differences, small-seeded genotypes GLK 26155 and BG 1053, and medium-seeded genotypes GLK 26164 and GLK 25121 had higher biomass, per cent filled pods, number of pods plant−1, Per cent pod set, 100-seed weight, partitioning coefficient and yield plant−1, while in large-seeded category, genotypes GLK 28119 and GLK 28126 showed higher biomass, per cent filled pods, per cent pod set, 100-seed weight, partitioning coefficient, harvest index and yield plant−1. Large-seeded genotypes showed higher Per cent filled pods, 100-seed weight, Per cent pod set and partitioning coefficient, followed by medium-and small-seeded genotypes, but the differences were non-significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, P. S., & Singh, D. N. (2003). Physiology and abiotic stresses in chickpea. In M. Ali, S. Kumar, & N. B. Singh (eds) Chickpea research in India (pp. 137–166). Kanpur, India: IIPR.

  • Bhor, S. B., Thete, R. Y., Patil, R. B., & Bharud, R. W. (1988). Effect of seed size on growth, yield, yield attributes and seed quality of gram. Seed Res, 16, 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitti Babu, G. (1992). Performance of groundnut different levels of pod grading, plant population and seed invigorations. M.Sc. thesis, ANGR Agricultural University, Hyderabad.

  • Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1967). Experimental designs. New York: Willey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya, B. S., Solanki, I. S., & Kumar, R. (1985). Germination rate and its genetics in Chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter, 13, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantuma, G., Von Kittlitz, E., Frauen, M., & Bond, D. A. (1983). Yield, yield stability and measurements of morphological and phenological charatcers of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grown in a wide range of environments in Western Europe. Zeischrift fur Pfanzenzuchtung, 90, 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Survey of India (2008–2009). Ministry of Finance-Govt. of India (pp. 17–20).

  • Egli, D. B. (1999). Variation in leaf starch and sink limitations during seed filling in Soybean. Crop Science, 39, 1361–1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egli, D. B., & Bruening, W. P. (2003). Increasing sink size does not increase photosynthesis during seed filling in soybean. European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESHA Food Data Base (2010). In The world’s healthiest foods. Salem, Oregon, USA: ESHA Foundation. http://www.whfoods.org.

  • FAO (2010). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Statistical databases. http://www.fao.org.

  • Gil, J., Nadal, S., Luna, D., Moreno, M. T., & de Haro, A. (1996). Variability of some physico-chemical characters in Desi and Kabuli chickpea types. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 71, 179–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscox, J. D., & Israelstam, G. F. (1979). A method for extraction of chlorophyll from tissues without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany, 51, 1332–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussaini, S. H., Sarada, P., & Reddy, B. M. (1984). Effect of seed size on germination and vigour in maize. Seed Research, 12, 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrikci, H., Knewtson, S., & Grusak, M. A. (2003). Chickpea leaves as a vegetable green for humans: Evaluation of mineral composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 83, 945–950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J. T. O., & Allen, R. L. (1965). Dependence of chloroplast pigment synthesis on protein synthesis: Effect of actidione. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 21, 523–530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, E. R., Santiago, A. S., Araujo, A. P., & Teixeira, M. G. (2005). Effects of the size of sown seed on growth and yield of common bean cultivars of different seed sizes. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 17, 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P., Gan, Y., Warkentin, T., & McDonald, C. (2003). Morphological plasticity of chickpea in a semi-arid environment. Crop Science, 43, 426–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi, P. K., & Biswal, U. C. (1979). Ageing of chloroplasts. In vitro-Quantitative analysis of the degradation of pigments, proteins and nucleic acids. Plant and Cell Physiology, 20, 775–779.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Planchon, C. (1979). Photosynthesis, transpiration, resistance to CO2 transfer and water efficiency of flag leaf of bread, durum wheat and triticale. Euphytica, 28, 403–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royo, C., Ramdani, A., Moragues, M., & Villegas, D. (2006). Durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions as affected by seed size. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 192, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N. P., & Shekdrake, A. R. (1976). Pulses physiology annual report 1975–1976. Part II: Chickpea physiology (pp. 176). Hyderabad, India: ICRISAT.

  • Tiwari, D. K., Tiwari, J. P., & Agrawal, V. K. (1978). Evaluation of soybean for high germinability and field emergence. Seed Research, 6, 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya, H. D. (2003). Geographical patterns of variation for morphological and agronomic characteristics in the chickpea germplasm collection. Euphytica, 132, 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya, H., Kumar, S., Gowda, C., & Singh, S. (2006). Two major genes for seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 147, 311–315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Maesen, L. J. G. (1972). A monograph of the genus with special reference to the chickpea (C. arietinum L.) Veeman and Zoren, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Weber, H., Borisjuk, L., & Wobus, U. (1996). Controlling seed development and seed size in Vicia faba: A role for seed coat-associated invertases and carbohydrate state. The Plant Journal, 10, 823–834.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagmeet Kaur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhary, S., Kaur, J., Singh, S. et al. Variations in morpho-physiological and yield attributes of kabuli chickpea genotypes in relation to seed size. Ind J Plant Physiol. 19, 28–35 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0065-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0065-z

Keywords

Navigation