Abstract
Introduction
In this short commentary, we highlight the changes in the conceptualization of ADHD from the perspective of the current main diagnostic systems (the DSM-5 and the imminent IDC-11) and their implications for the assessment/diagnosis of the disorder.
Results
We provide a short review on the most widely known assessment methods available today, such as virtual reality tools, while also paying special attention to the ecological validity of these measures. Specifically, we describe new tools based on virtual reality, which has the potential to become a reliable, widely spread, and ecologically valid measure of ADHD.
Conclusions
While measures using virtual reality tools have shown effectiveness in some previous studies, their characteristics, applicability, and future challenges concerning their use are presented here.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arns M, Heinrich H, Strehl U. Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol. 2014;95:108–15.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
World Health Organization. ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
Levy F. DSM-5, ICD-11, RDoC and ADHD. Aust N Z Psychiatry. 2014;48(12):1163–9.
Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Pennington BF, et al. Validity of DSM-IV attention déficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121(4):991–1010.
Sciberras E, Lycett K, Efron D, Mensah F, Gerner B, Hiscock H. Anxiety in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2014;133:801–8.
Dalsgaard S, Nielsen HS, Simonsen M. Consequences of ADHD medication use for children’s outcomes. J Health Econ. 2014;37:137–51.
Polanczyk G, Silva de Lima M, Horta BL, Biederman J, Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(6):942–8.
Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
García T, González-Castro P, Areces D, Cueli M, Rodríguez C. Executive functions in children and adolescents: the types of assessment measures used and implications for their validity in clinical and educational contexts. Pap Psicol. 2014;35:215–33.
Bart O, Raz S, Dan O. Reliability and validity of the Online Continuous Performance Test among children. Assessment. 2014;21:637–43.
García T, González-Pienda JA, Rodríguez C, Álvarez D, Álvarez L. Psychometric characteristics of the BRIEF scale for the assessment of executive functions in Spanish clinical population. Psicothema. 2014;26:45–52.
Iriarte Y, Díaz-Orueta U, Cueto E, Irazustabarrena P, Banterla F, Climent G. AULA—advanced virtual reality tool for the assessment of attention: normative study in Spain. J Atten Disord. 2012;20(10):1–27.
Areces D, Rodríguez C, García T, Cueli M, González-Castro, P. Efficacy of a continuous performance test based on virtual reality in the diagnosis of ADHD and its clinical presentations. J Attend Disord. In press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Celestino Rodríguez, Trinidad García, & Debora Areces declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez, C., García, T. & Areces, D. New and Future Challenges Concerning the Use of Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing ADHD. Curr Dev Disord Rep 4, 8–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-017-0103-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-017-0103-4