Skip to main content
Log in

New and Future Challenges Concerning the Use of Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing ADHD

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
Current Developmental Disorders Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In this short commentary, we highlight the changes in the conceptualization of ADHD from the perspective of the current main diagnostic systems (the DSM-5 and the imminent IDC-11) and their implications for the assessment/diagnosis of the disorder.

Results

We provide a short review on the most widely known assessment methods available today, such as virtual reality tools, while also paying special attention to the ecological validity of these measures. Specifically, we describe new tools based on virtual reality, which has the potential to become a reliable, widely spread, and ecologically valid measure of ADHD.

Conclusions

While measures using virtual reality tools have shown effectiveness in some previous studies, their characteristics, applicability, and future challenges concerning their use are presented here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arns M, Heinrich H, Strehl U. Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol. 2014;95:108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

  3. World Health Organization. ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.

  4. Levy F. DSM-5, ICD-11, RDoC and ADHD. Aust N Z Psychiatry. 2014;48(12):1163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Pennington BF, et al. Validity of DSM-IV attention déficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121(4):991–1010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sciberras E, Lycett K, Efron D, Mensah F, Gerner B, Hiscock H. Anxiety in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2014;133:801–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalsgaard S, Nielsen HS, Simonsen M. Consequences of ADHD medication use for children’s outcomes. J Health Econ. 2014;37:137–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Polanczyk G, Silva de Lima M, Horta BL, Biederman J, Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(6):942–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

  10. García T, González-Castro P, Areces D, Cueli M, Rodríguez C. Executive functions in children and adolescents: the types of assessment measures used and implications for their validity in clinical and educational contexts. Pap Psicol. 2014;35:215–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bart O, Raz S, Dan O. Reliability and validity of the Online Continuous Performance Test among children. Assessment. 2014;21:637–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. García T, González-Pienda JA, Rodríguez C, Álvarez D, Álvarez L. Psychometric characteristics of the BRIEF scale for the assessment of executive functions in Spanish clinical population. Psicothema. 2014;26:45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iriarte Y, Díaz-Orueta U, Cueto E, Irazustabarrena P, Banterla F, Climent G. AULA—advanced virtual reality tool for the assessment of attention: normative study in Spain. J Atten Disord. 2012;20(10):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Areces D, Rodríguez C, García T, Cueli M, González-Castro, P. Efficacy of a continuous performance test based on virtual reality in the diagnosis of ADHD and its clinical presentations. J Attend Disord. In press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celestino Rodríguez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Celestino Rodríguez, Trinidad García, & Debora Areces declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, C., García, T. & Areces, D. New and Future Challenges Concerning the Use of Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing ADHD. Curr Dev Disord Rep 4, 8–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-017-0103-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-017-0103-4

Keywords

Navigation