Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Curriculum Reform in Korea: Issues and Challenges for Twenty-first Century Learning

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the introduction of international achievement assessments, Korea has received a great deal of global attention because of its strong academic performance achieved at primary and secondary education levels. However, Korea has not fully benefited from these achievements in education for several reasons as discussed in this paper. The Korean education system is now faced with challenges that have emerged from these achievements. The purpose of this paper is thus to discuss the curriculum reforms in Korea, which were undertaken to achieve sustainable success and meet the challenges of the twenty-first century learning ecology. This paper highlights that beneath its high academic performance, the Korean educational system faces problems related to students’ low interest levels in learning, a declining index of students’ happiness, and increasingly deskilled teachers because of the prescribed national curriculum. This paper describes the current shift taking place in the Korean educational system as it move from knowledge delivery to competency development, from academic excellence to student happiness, and from centralized and detailed prescriptions to more autonomous decision making by teachers in order to overcome these problems and respond actively to twenty-first century learning ecology. In addition, this paper suggests that changes must be followed in terms of school practice, teachers’ professional development, and sociocultural structures as means of achieving these reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACARA. (2009). Curriculum design: Version 2.0. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

  • ACARA. (2010). The shape of the Australian curriculum: Version 2.0. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

  • Anthony, L. (2008). Teacher concerns about curriculum reform: The case of project learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1978). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek, K. (2010). The elementary teachers’ perception about the school based curriculum autonomy. The Journal of Elementary Education, 23(2), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S., & Watson, V. (2006). Shifting the frame: Exploring integration of the key competencies at six normal schools. Te Aro: New Zealand Council for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K., Wong, A., & Lo, E. (2012). Relational analysis of intrinsic motivation, achievement goals, learning strategies and academic achievement for Hong Kong secondary students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 230–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. (2010). A study on the autonomy of elementary school curriculum. The Journal of Elementary Education, 23(2), 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., Shin, C., & Park, G. (2013). Directions for implementation of free learning semester. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1997). The new production of knowledge. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gim, C. (2010). An analysis of the possibilities and limitations of the national curriculum 2009 in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(3), 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gim, C. (2011). A critique of the policy discourse of school-based curriculum autonomy in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(4), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W. (2011). Policy efforts for autonomous and diversified school curriculum: Paradoxical results and potential alternatives. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(2), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W. (2012). An international study of the changing nature and role of school curricula: From transmitting content knowledge to developing students’ key competencies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W., & Lee, K. (2011). Implementation of competency-based curriculum in practice: Based on the case of Quebec, Canada. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., Lim, Y., & Jang, S. (2013). An inquiry on the loose semester for career exploration for secondary school students based on the survey of stakeholders. The Korea Educational Review, 19(2), 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D., Lee, S., & Lim, K. Y. (2012). Moving forward: Key areas of educational research for the Asia pacific. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(2), 219–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, K. (2006). A narrative inquiry on two teachers’ experiences of the practical process of integrated subject matters’ implementation in elementary school. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, Y., & Lee, K. (2011). Study on teachers’ acceptance of curriculum autonomy polices. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(3), 93–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, K., Park, C., & Lee, M. (2011). An analysis of elementary teachers’ perceptions and concern levels on the school curriculum autonomy. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 349–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo, W. (2008). A study on academic life and culture of Korean High School students. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonnaert, P., Masciotra, D., Barrette, J., Morel, D., & Mane, Y. (2007). From competence in the curriculum to competence in action. Prospects, XXXVII(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. (1996). A sociological study on educational aspiration in Korea. A Journal of Research in Education, 8, 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. (2007). The hermeneutical reconceptualizing of curriculum and teaching-learning process. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(4), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W., & Park, Y. (2006). Indigenous psychological analysis of academic achievement in Korea: The influence of self-efficacy, parents, and culture. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M., et al. (2004). The development of national educational standards. Berlin: BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Education Development Institute. (2012). Analysis of statistics of education: Statistics of primary, secondary education. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Employment Information Service. (2008). Report on the practice of career education. Seoul: Korea Employment Information Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2007). The features and the problems of Korean modernization: Focusing on Chabol and educational enthusiasm. The Humanities, 40, 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2004). The patterns and social contexts of classroom teaching progress in the elementary school. Anthropology of Education, 7(1), 131–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Jeon, J., Huh, K., Hong, W., & Kim, M. (2009). Redesigning elementary and secondary school curriculum for developing future Koreans’ key competences. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Kwak, Y., Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2012). Design of the competencies-based national curriculum for the future society. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Min, Y., Jeon, J., Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2008). A study on developing key competencies in the primary/secondary school curriculum for the future of Koreans(II): Focused on the establishing sub-domains and components for key competencies. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeil Economist (2010, October, 3). Competition rate for secondary teachers in Seoul is up to 52: 1. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2010&no=532201.

  • McCluskey, N. (2010). Behind the curtain: Assessing the case for national curriculum standards. Policy Analysis, 661. Retrieved January 24, 2013, from http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/behind-curtainassessing-case-national-curriculum-standards.

  • McKinsey and Company. (2007). How the world’s best-performing schools systems come out on top. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Education/Worlds_school_Systems_Final.pdf.

  • McKinsey and Company. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Education/How-the-Worlds-Most-Improved-school-Systems-Keep-Getting-Better_Download-version_Final.pdf.

  • Min, Y. (2008). The limitations and possibilities on expanding the autonomy of school curriculum in Korea: An analysis of the 2007 New National Curriculum Organization and implementation guidelines. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministere de l’Education. (2007). Education in Quebec: Overview. Saskatoon: Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1992). General guideline of national curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2013a). Basic plan for national achievement assessment in 2013. Seoul: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2013b). Basic Plan for free learning semester in secondary schools. Seoul: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. (2009). General guideline of national curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grade. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Statistical Office. (2010). 2010 Statistics of adolescence in Korea. Retrieved June 25, 2013, from http://academic.naver.com/ openUrl.nhn?doc_id = 38200025&linkType = doclink.

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. (2007). Collateral damage. Cambridge: Harvard Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background (Vol. II). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Education and skills. In OECD (Ed.), How’s life?: Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved June, 5, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-9-en.

  • Park, M. (2007). A narrative inquiry into elementary teachers’ implementation of integrated curriculum: Based on three teachers’ stories. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (2008). A beginning discussion on searching for the starting-point and direction of curriculum decentralization in Korea. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(2), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, M. (2009). Analysis of the characteristics of competence-based curriculum and its critical issues. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(4), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Park, C., Seo, H., & Youm, Y. (2010). Collection of Korean child well-being index and its international comparison with other OECD countries. Korean Journal of Sociology, 44(2), 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (2006). Key competencies: A new way forward or more of the same? In L. Sandra (Ed.), In New Zealand Council for Educational Research, key competencies: Repacking the old or creating the new? (pp. 5–16). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2008). Seeing school systems through the prism of PISA. In A. Luke, K. Weir, & A. Woods (Eds.), Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework: A report to the Queensland Studies Authority Queensland, Australia (pp. 71–85). Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shon, M. (2011). The possibility and limits of competence based curriculum. The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, 10(1), 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, C. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative and International Education Society, 38(1), 10–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y. (2011). Cultivating borrowed future: The politics of neoliberal loanwords in South Korean cross-national policy borrowing. Comparative Education, 47(4), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y., & Kang, M. (2012). The cultural politics of national testing and test result release policy in South Korea: A critical discourse analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Korea Times. (2011, February 6). South Korea: 146 students committed suicide last year. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2011/02/117_80889.html.

  • Webber, B. (2006). Key competencies: Repacking the old or creating the new? Conference proceedings, April, 2006. Te Aro: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F. E. (2001). Vergleichendeleistungsmessung in schulen -eineumstritteneselbstverständlichkeit. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Leistungsmessungen in schulen (pp. 17–31). Basel: BeltzVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welner, K., & Oakes, J. (2008). Structuring curriculum: Technical, normative and political considerations. In F. Connelly, M. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 91–111). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2012). Country reports and charts. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/repkor.pdf.

  • Yin, H., Lee, J., & Jin, Y. (2011). Teacher receptivity to curriculum reform and the need for trust: An exploratory study from Southwest China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H., Kim, Y., Lee, K., & Jeon, J. (2007). A study on developing a key competence in the primary/secondary school curriculum for the future of Koreans. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2009). Comments on the common core standards initiative. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 6(3), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyunghee So.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

So, K., Kang, J. Curriculum Reform in Korea: Issues and Challenges for Twenty-first Century Learning. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 23, 795–803 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0161-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0161-2

Keywords

Navigation