Abstract
Background
Bosentan is approved for use in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The primary aim of the pharmacokinetic modeling was the provision of a systematic guidance for study design and enhanced understanding of pharmacokinetics across the entire pediatric age range.
Methods
A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed for the pediatric population; starting from an adult model, the effects of body weight, age, and maturation of relevant metabolizing enzymes were incorporated to extrapolate the pharmacokinetics to children. A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model was developed to identify relevant covariates.
Results
Based on model predictions, a dose of 0.5 mg/kg led to an exposure distinguishable from a dose of 2 mg/kg, and an additional blood sampling time point at 2 h (the predicted time of maximum concentration) allowed more precise estimation of bosentan exposure in children. The lower exposure observed in children compared with adults could be explained by maturation-related changes in clearance. Clinical data confirmed the model predictions.
Conclusions
Maturational changes in drug clearance and developmental changes in body weight were identified as key elements of bosentan pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients. Estimating bosentan exposure using physiologically based and population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation supported dose selection in pediatric patients. Model-based exposure estimates helped in reducing the number of the youngest pediatric patients to be studied. Pharmacokinetic models can provide a systematic guidance for study design and enhanced understanding of pharmacokinetics across the entire pediatric age range.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McLaughlin V, Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ. New horizons in pulmonary arterial hypertension management. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(134):408–9.
McLaughlin VV, Shah SJ, Souza R, Humbert M. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(18):1976–97.
Hoeper MM, Bogaard HJ, Condliffe R, Frantz R, Khanna D, Kurzyna M, et al. Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25 Suppl):D42–50.
Barst RJ, Ertel SI, Beghetti M, Ivy DD. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: a comparison between children and adults. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(3):665–77.
Beghetti M. Bosentan in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2009;7(2):225–33.
Ivy DD, Rosenzweig EB, Lemarié J-C, Brand M, Rosenberg D, Barst RJ. Long-term outcomes in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with bosentan in real-world clinical settings. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(9):1332–8.
European Medicines Agency. Tracleer in pulmonary arterial hypertension: summary of product characteristics. 2012 [cited Jan 22, 2016]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000401/WC500041597.pdf.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Prescribing information: Tracleer (bosentan) tablets, for oral use. 2001-2015 [cited 2016 Jan 22, 2016]. Available from: https://www.tracleerrems.com/docs/Tracleer_Full_Prescribing_Information.pdf, http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/021290s012lbl.pdf.
Barst RJ, Ivy D, Dingemanse J, Widlitz A, Schmitt K, Doran A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of bosentan in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73(4):372–82.
Beghetti M, Haworth SG, Bonnet D, Barst RJ, Acar P, Fraisse A, et al. Pharmacokinetic and clinical profile of a novel formulation of bosentan in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension: the FUTURE-1 study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68(6):948–55.
European Medicines Agency. Tracleer (bosentan): summary of the European public assessment report. 2009 March 13, 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 22, 2016]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/000401/human_med_001100.jsp.
Ivy DD, Abman SH, Barst RJ, Berger RM, Bonnet D, Fleming TR, et al. Pediatric pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25 Suppl):D117–26.
Steinhorn RH, Fineman J, Kusic-Pajic A, Cornelisse P, Gehin M, Nowbakht P, et al. Bosentan as adjunctive therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: results of the multicenter placebo-controlled FUTURE-4 trial. J Pediatr. 2016;177:90–6.
Steinhorn RH, Kusic-Pajic A, Cornelisse P, Fineman JR, Gehin M, Nowbakht P, et al. Bosentan as adjunctive therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: results of the FUTURE-4 study. Circulation. 2014;130(Suppl 2):A13503.
Eissing T, Kuepfer L, Becker C, Block M, Coboeken K, Gaub T, et al. A computational systems biology software platform for multiscale modeling and simulation: integrating whole-body physiology, disease biology, and molecular reaction networks. Front Physiol. 2011;2:4.
Dingemanse J, van Giersbergen PL. Clinical pharmacology of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(15):1089–115.
Treiber A, Schneiter R, Hausler S, Stieger B. Bosentan is a substrate of human OATP1B1 and OATP1B3: inhibition of hepatic uptake as the common mechanism of its interactions with cyclosporin A, rifampicin, and sildenafil. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35(8):1400–7.
Edginton AN, Schmitt W, Willmann S. Development and evaluation of a generic physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(10):1013–34.
Lixoft-Incuballiance. Monolix User Guide. 4.2.0 ed. Orsay, France; 2012.
Beghetti M, Berger RM. The challenges in paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(134):498–504.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). New drug application #203109: sildenafil. Clinical review. 2012 [cited 2016 Feb 16, 2016]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/UCM320472.pdf.
U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). New drug application #203109: sildenafil. Summary review. 2012 [cited 2016 Feb 16, 2016]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/203109Orig1s000SumR.pdf.
Gomberg-Maitland M, Bull TM, Saggar R, Barst RJ, Elgazayerly A, Fleming TR, et al. New trial designs and potential therapies for pulmonary artery hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25 Suppl):D82–91.
Beghetti M, Berger RM, Schulze-Neick I, Day RW, Pulido T, Feinstein J, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of paediatric pulmonary hypertension in current clinical practice. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(3):689–700.
Beghetti M, Schulze-Neick I, Berger RM, Ivy DD, Bonnet D, Weintraub RG, et al. Haemodynamic characterisation and heart catheterisation complications in children with pulmonary hypertension: Insights from the Global TOPP Registry (tracking outcomes and practice in paediatric pulmonary hypertension). Int J Cardiol. 2016;15(203):325–30.
Dunne J, Rodriguez WJ, Murphy MD, Beasley BN, Burckart GJ, Filie JD, et al. Extrapolation of adult data and other data in pediatric drug-development programs. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1242–9.
Foissac F, Bouazza N, Valade E, De Sousa Mendes M, Fauchet F, Benaboud S, et al. Prediction of drug clearance in children. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55(7):739–47.
Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Tucker GT. Prediction of the clearance of eleven drugs and associated variability in neonates, infants and children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(9):931–56.
Rodieux F, Wilbaux M, van den Anker JN, Pfister M. Effect of kidney function on drug kinetics and dosing in neonates, infants, and children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(12):1183–204.
Jones H, Rowland-Yeo K. Basic concepts in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in drug discovery and development. CPT. 2013;2:e63.
Jones HM, Mayawala K, Poulin P. Dose selection based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approaches. AAPS J. 2013;15(2):377–87.
Chetty M, Rose RH, Abduljalil K, Patel N, Lu G, Cain T, et al. Applications of linking PBPK and PD models to predict the impact of genotypic variability, formulation differences, differences in target binding capacity and target site drug concentrations on drug responses and variability. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:258.
Guest EJ, Aarons L, Houston JB, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Galetin A. Critique of the two-fold measure of prediction success for ratios: application for the assessment of drug-drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39(2):170–3.
Houston JB, Galetin A. Methods for predicting in vivo pharmacokinetics using data from in vitro assays. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9(9):940–51.
Wang YH. Confidence assessment of the Simcyp time-based approach and a static mathematical model in predicting clinical drug-drug interactions for mechanism-based CYP3A inhibitors. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(7):1094–104.
Weber C, Schmitt R, Birnboeck H, Hopfgartner G, van Marle SP, Peeters PA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in healthy human subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996;60(2):124–37.
Dingemanse J, Bodin F, Weidekamm E, Kutz K, van Giersbergen P. Influence of food intake and formulation on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42(3):283–9.
Weber C, Schmitt R, Birnboeck H, Hopfgartner G, Eggers H, Meyer J, et al. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in healthy male volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;39(7):703–14.
Acknowledgements
We thank Laurent Nicolas (Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland) for his contributions to the protocol design of FUTURE-3, -4, and -5 and Michael Block and Stefan Willmann (BTS, Leverkusen, Germany) for their contributions to the PBPK modeling work. We thank the clinical teams and all patients and parents involved in the conduct of the clinical studies that helped determine appropriate doses of bosentan for pediatric patients.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included.
Funding
All studies were funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. JZ, MG, AKP, AK, and JD were employees of Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd at the time of study conduct and analysis. MB consults for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Conflict of interest
JZ, MG, AKP, AK, and JD were employees of Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd at the time of study conduct and analysis. MB consults for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zisowsky, J., Géhin, M., Kusic-Pajic, A. et al. Pediatric Development of Bosentan Facilitated by Modeling and Simulation. Pediatr Drugs 19, 121–130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-016-0206-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-016-0206-0