Skip to main content
Log in

First-Line Management of EGFR-Mutated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: Recent Developments

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gefitinib and erlotinib are small-molecule reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Objective responses have been observed frequently in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating EGFR mutations, the most common being deletions in exon 19 and the exon 21 L858R mutation. EGFR mutations are prevalent in female patients, those who have never smoked, those of Asian ethnicity and those who have adenocarcinoma histology. Given the efficacy of EGFR TKIs in advanced NSCLC in the salvage setting, and their favourable toxicity profile compared with conventional chemotherapy, there is considerable interest in evaluating their efficacy in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. To date, there have been several phase II and phase III studies that have examined the efficacy of first-line single-agent EGFR TKIs in unselected, clinically selected or molecularly selected populations. Here we review and compare the differences in these phase III trials. Most phase III trials chose progression-free survival (PFS) rather than overall survival (OS) as their primary endpoint. PFS was prolonged but OS was not. The recent development of novel irreversible EGFR TKIs, such as afatinib and dacomitinib, is also reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Mortality burden of disease—cause specific mortality, 2008. 2012.

  2. Yang C-H, Yu C-J, Shih J-Y, et al. Specific EGFR mutations predict treatment outcome of stage IIIB/IV patients with chemotherapy-naive non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line gefitinib monotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2745–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004;304:1497–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:13306–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin C-C, Yang JC-H. Optimal management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Drugs 2011;71(1):79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herbst RS, Maddox A-M, Rothenberg ML, et al. Selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 is generally well-tolerated and has activity in non-small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors: results of a phase I trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3815–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baselga J, Rischin D, Ranson M, et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4292–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3267–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:239–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Han J-Y, Park K, Kim S-W, et al. First-SIGNAL: first-line single-agent Iressa versus gemcitabine and cisplatin trial in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1122–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:735–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:121–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2380–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:947–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang JC-H, Shih J-Y, Su W-C, et al. Afatinib for patients with lung adenocarcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (LUX-Lung 2): a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:539–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang JC-H, Schuler MH, Yamamoto N, et al. LUX-Lung 3: a randomized, open-label, phase III study of afatinib versus pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung harboring EGFR-activating mutations. ASCO Meet Abstr 2012;30:LBA7500.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, et al. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:528–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki R, Hasegawa Y, Baba K, et al. A phase II study of single-agent gefitinib as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1599–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reck M, Buchholz E, Schott-von-Römer K, et al. Gefitinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2006;7:406–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Niho S, Kubota K, Goto K, et al. First-line single agent treatment with gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:64–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimura H, Kasahara K, Shibata K, et al. EGFR mutation of tumor and serum in gefitinib-treated patients with chemotherapy-naive non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:260–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. D’Addario G, Rauch D, Stupp R, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of gefitinib first-line therapy followed by chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): SAKK protocol 19/03. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:739–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Giaccone G, Gallegos Ruiz M, Le Chevalier T, et al. Erlotinib for frontline treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6049–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi DR, Lee DH, Choi C-M, et al. Erlotinib in first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective phase II study. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:3457–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang A, Parikh P, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib (IRESSA) in patients of Asian origin with refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer: subset analysis from the ISEL study. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:847–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park K, Goto K. A review of the benefit–risk profile of gefitinib in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:561–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8919–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:339–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Inoue A, Suzuki T, Fukuhara T, et al. Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3340–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Asahina H, Yamazaki K, Kinoshita I, et al. A phase II trial of gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:998–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sequist LV, Martins RG, Spigel D, et al. First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2442–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Lindeman NI, et al. Phase II clinical trial of chemotherapy-naïve patients ≥70 years of age treated with erlotinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:760–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Crinò L, Cappuzzo F, Zatloukal P, et al. Gefitinib versus vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naïve elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (INVITE): a randomized, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4253–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen Y-M, Tsai C-M, Fan W-C et al. Phase II randomized trial of erlotinib or vinorelbine in chemonaive, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 70 years or older. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Usui K, et al. First-line gefitinib for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations without indication for chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1394–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maemondo M, Minegishi Y, Inoue A, et al. First-line gefitinib in patients aged 75 or older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: NEJ 003 study. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:1417–1422.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gridelli C, Ciardiello F, Gallo C, et al. First-line erlotinib followed by second-line cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: the TORCH randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3002–11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3543–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fukuoka M, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2866–74.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun TT, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7276–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Maemondo M, et al. Final overall survival results of NEJ002, a phase III trial comparing gefitinib to carboplatin (CBDCA) plus paclitaxel (TXL) as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. ASCO Meet Abstr. 2011;29:7519.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yatabe Y, Hida T, Horio Y, et al. A rapid, sensitive assay to detect EGFR mutation in small biopsy specimens from lung cancer. J Mol Diagn JMD. 2006;8:335–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis JA. Statistical principles for clinical trials (ICH E9): an introductory note on an international guideline. Stat Med. 1999;18:1903–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, et al. Updated overall survival results of WJTOG 3405, a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib (G) with cisplatin plus docetaxel (CD) as the first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). ASCO Meet Abstr. 2012;30:7521.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou C, Wu YL, Liu X, et al. Overall survival (OS) results from OPTIMAL (CTONG0802), a phase III trial of erlotinib (E) versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine (GC) as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASCO Meet Abstr. 2012;30:7520.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rosell R, Molina-Vila MA, Taron M, et al. EGFR compound mutants and survival on erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) in the EURTAC study. ASCO Meet Abstr. 2012;30:7522.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang C-H, Simms L, Park K et al. Efficacy and safety of cisplatin/pemetrexed versus cisplatin/gemcitabine as first-line treatment in East Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of an exploratory subgroup analysis of a phase III trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:688-695.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reck M, von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, et al. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAiL. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1227–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel–carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2542–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:521–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ciuleanu T. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2009;374:1432–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M, et al. Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:247–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Bhattacharya S, Fyfe G, Gray RJ, Sargent DJ. Role of sensitivity analyses in assessing progression-free survival in late-stage oncology trials. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5958–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Soria JC, Massard C, Le Chevalier T. Should progression-free survival be the primary measure of efficacy for advanced NSCLC therapy? Ann Oncol. 2010;21:2324–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Claassens L, van Meerbeeck J, Coens C, et al. Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: an update of a systematic review on methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2104–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cella D, Eton DT, Fairclough DL, et al. What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:285–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Thongprasert S, Duffield E, Saijo, N et al. Health-related quality-of-life in a randomized phase III first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients from Asia with advanced NSCLC (IPASS). J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:1872–1880.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Updated efficacy and quality-of-life (QoL) analyses in OPTIMAL, a phase III, randomized, open-label study of first-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive (EGFR Act Mut+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASCO Meet Abstr. 2011;29:7520.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Herbst RS, Ansari R, Bustin F, et al. Efficacy of bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy (BeTa): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1846–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kabbinavar FF, Miller VA, Johnson BE, et al. Overall survival (OS) in ATLAS, a phase IIIb trial comparing bevacizumab (B) therapy with or without erlotinib (E) after completion of chemotherapy (chemo) with B for first-line treatment of locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASCO Meet Abstr. 2010;28:7526.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wu W, Onn A, Isobe T, et al. Targeted therapy of orthotopic human lung cancer by combined vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling blockade. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:471–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Chaft JE, Oxnard GR, Sima CS, et al. Disease flare after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib: implications for clinical trial design. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6298–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Park K, Tsai C-M, Ahn M-j, et al. ASPIRATION: phase II study of continued erlotinib beyond RECIST progression in Asian patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASCO Meet Abstr 2012;30:TPS7614.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, et al. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008;27:4702–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Yap TA, Vidal L, Adam J, et al. Phase I trial of the irreversible EGFR and HER2 kinase inhibitor BIBW 2992 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3965–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ramalingam SS, Blackhall F, Krzakowski M, et al. Randomized phase II study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3337–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Boyer MJ, Janne PA, Mok T, et al. ARCHER: dacomitinib (D; PF-00299804) versus erlotinib (E) for advanced (adv) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)—a randomized double-blind phase III study. ASCO Meet Abstr 2012;30:TPS7615.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kris M, Goldberg Z, Janne PA, et al. Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-Her tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), for first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant or Her2-mutant or -amplified lung cancers. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:ix400–46.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Bria E, Milella M, Cuppone F, et al. Outcome of advanced NSCLC patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations randomized to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy as first-line treatment: a meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2277–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Keedy VL, Temin S, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer considering first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist with the preparation of this review. Dr Yang is an uncompensated advisor for Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly. He received honoraria for an advisory role or being a speaker from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Clovis and Novartis; Dr Lin and Dr Liao have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chia-Chi Lin or James Chih-Hsin Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liao, BC., Lin, CC. & Yang, J.CH. First-Line Management of EGFR-Mutated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: Recent Developments. Drugs 73, 357–369 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-013-0020-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-013-0020-8

Keywords

Navigation