
References
Wang Y, Jadhav PR, Lala M, Gobburu JV. Clarification on precision criteria to derive sample size when designing pediatric pharmacokinetic studies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52:1601–6.
Leroux S, Turner MA, Barin-Le Guellec C, Hill H, van den Anker JN, Kearns GL, On behalf of the TINN and GRiP Consortia, et al. Pharmacokinetic studies in neonates: the utility of an opportunistic sampling design. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015. doi:10.1007/s40262-015-0291-1.
Zhao W, Hill H, Le Guellec C, Neal T, Mahoney S, Paulus S, On behalf of the TINN consortium, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in neonates and young infants less than 3 months of age. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(11):6572–80.
Rees VE, Bulitta JB, Nation RL, Tsuji BT, Sörgel F, Landersdorfer CB. Shape does matter: short high-concentration exposure minimizes resistance emergence for fluoroquinolones in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(3):818–26.
Mentre F, Dubruc C, Thenot JP. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and optimization of the experimental design for mizolastine solution in children. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28(3):299–319.
Lutsar I, Trafojer UM, Heath PT, Metsvaht T, Standing J, Esposito S, On behalf of the NeoMero Consortium, et al. Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of late onset sepsis in children of less than 90 days of age: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
No funding was received in the preparation of this manuscript. JS, BA, NH, IL, and MT have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Standing, J.F., Anderson, B.J., Holford, N.H. et al. Comment on Pharmacokinetic Studies in Neonates: The Utility of an Opportunistic Sampling Design. Clin Pharmacokinet 54, 1287–1288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0344-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0344-5