1 Correction to: Appl Health Econ and Health Policy (2018) 16:819–836 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0415-5
In Sect. 3.3.1, the second sentence of the second paragraph, which reads:
“However, it does not allow for pooling of estimates and must be used with one expert at a time, or by obtaining consensus opinions from multiple experts, face-to-face.”
should read:
“However, it does not allow for pooling of estimates and must be used with one expert at a time, or by obtaining consensus opinions from multiple experts.”
In the row of Table 2 labelled “Allow for flexibility in the manner in which elicitation is conducted (e.g. via the internet, in person or via telephone)”, the MATCH column, which contains a red dot indicating it does not meet requirements followed by the text:
“Designed to be conducted in person.”
should contain a green dot indicating it meets requirements in full followed by the text:
“Designed to be conducted via the internet but could be used in person or via telephone.”
The corrected table is provided in this correction notice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peel, A., Jenks, M., Choudhury, M. et al. Correction to: Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance‑Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 17, 263–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00463-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00463-w