Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular docking studies of gyrase inhibitors: weighing earlier screening bedrock

  • Original Research
  • Published:
In Silico Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For any antimicrobial assay, a standard drug is used to compare the bactericidal efficiency of the bioactive compound under screening. The standard drugs have different targets that may be intracellular or membrane located. The location of the target is believed to be determining the bioactivity of the drug depending on the drug's access to its target. Therefore, different drugs must have a different magnitude in exhibiting the biological effect. However, in most of the published literature about the screening of bioactive compounds on antimicrobial activity, generally, the standard drug is randomly chosen while comparing against the bioactive compound of interest. Further, the antimicrobial activity is inferred by comparing the randomly chosen standard drugs without knowing the physicochemical parameters of the standard drug and the test molecule. It is just like an unfair comparison of the impact of a bullet with the impact of an explosive in a combat scene. Computer-based strategies for structure-based drug discovery presents a valuable alternative to the costly and time-consuming process of random screening. The docking studies provide better insights into the binding mechanism of substrate and inhibitor at the molecular level. The evaluation of such a comparison of bioactive compounds against randomly selected standard drugs through a customized virtual screening pipeline showed 57% false positives, 18% true positive, 17% true negative, 8% false-negative results. This study directs for mandatory cheminformatics-based assessment of the bioactive compounds before choosing the standard drug to compare with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagchi B, Kar S, Dey SK, Bhandary S, Roy D, Mukhopadhyay TK, Das S, Nandy P (2013) In situ synthesis and antibacterial activity of copper nanoparticle loaded natural montmorillonite clay based on contact inhibition and ion release. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 108:358–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK, Chowdhury A, Raihan SZ, Muhit MA, Akbar MA, Mowla R (2012) Phytochemical investigation with assessment of cytotoxicity and antibacterial activities of chloroform extract of the leaves of Kalanchoe plnnata. Am J Plant Physiol 7(1):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campoli-Richards DM, Monk JP, Price A, Benfield P, Todd PA, Ward A (1988) Ciprofloxacin. Drugs 35(4):373–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung PY, Chung LY, Navaratnam P (2014) Potential targets by pentacyclic triterpenoids from Callicarpa farinosa against methicillin-resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Fitoterapia 94:48–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DE (2008) What has virtual screening ever done for drug discovery? Expert Opin Drug Discov 3(8):841–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duch W, Swaminathan K, Meller J (2007) Artificial intelligence approaches for rational drug design and discovery. Curr Pharm Des 13(14):1497–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazal SA, Abuzarqa M, Mahasneh AM (1992) Antimicrobial activity of Polygonum equisetiforme extracts and flavonoids. Phytother Res 6(5):265–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hara K, Kohno S, Kadota J-I, Tomono K, Hirakata Y, Maesaki S, Nakatomi M, Asai S, Mizukane R, Okuno K, Fukushima K, Itoh N, Inoue Y, Koike T, Onishi K, Omichi M, Yamada G, Hiraga Y, Watanabe A, Utsunomiya Y (1997) Clinical evaluation of ciprofloxacin for bacterial pneumonia—phase III comparative study of intravenous ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime. J Jap Soc Chemother 45:901–922. https://doi.org/10.11250/chemotherapy1995.45.901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JP, Rees S, Kalindjian SB, Philpott KL (2011) Principles of early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 162(6):1239–1249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Isitua CC, Ibeh IN, Olayinka JN (2016) Antibacterial activity of Moringa oleifera Lam leaves on enteric human pathogens. Indian J Appl Res 6(8):553–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen WL (2009) Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization. Acc Chem Res 42(6):724–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus CH (2008) Low hanging fruit in infectious disease drug development. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:434–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzu OF, Gowda R, Sharma A, Robertson GP (2014) Leelamine mediates cancer cell death through inhibition of intracellular cholesterol transport. Mol Cancer Ther 13(7):1690–1703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lage OM, Ramos MC, Calisto R, Almeida E, Vasconcelos V, Vicente F (2018) Current screening methodologies in drug discovery for selected human diseases. Mar Drugs 16(8):279

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JA, Uhlik MT, Moxham CM, Tomandl D, Sall DJ (2012) Modern phenotypic drug discovery is a viable, neoclassic pharma strategy. J Med Chem 55:4527–4538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh B, Satish S (2008) Antimicrobial activity of some important medicinal plants against plant and human pathogens. World J Agric Sci 4:839–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Masadeh MM, Alzoubi KH, Al-Azzam SI, Khabour OF, Al-Buhairan AM (2016) Ciprofloxacin-induced antibacterial activity is atteneuated by pretreatment with antioxidant agents. Pathogens 5(1):28

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid MA, Gustafson KR, Boyd MR (2001) New cytotoxic N-nethylated β-carboline alkaloids from the marine Ascidian Eudistoma g ilboverde. J Nat Prod 64(11):1454–1456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui SA, Rahman A, Rahman MO, Akbar MA, Ali MA, Al-Hemaid FM, Elshikh MS, Farah MA (2019) A novel triterpenoid 16-hydroxy betulinic acid isolated from Mikania cordata attributes multi-faced pharmacological activities. Saudi Jo Biol Sci 26(3):554–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spížek J, Novotná J, Řezanka T, Demain AL (2010) Do we need new antibiotics? The search for new targets and new compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37(12):1241–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31(2):455–461

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ulloora S, Kumar S, Shabaraya R, Adhikari AV (2013) New dihydropyridine derivatives: anti-inflammatory, analgesic and docking studies. Med Chem Res 22(4):1549–1562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler G, Field R, Tomlinson M (2012) Phenotypic screens with model organisms. In: Press CU (ed) Chemical genomics. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Robertson DH, Brooks CL III, Vieth M (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: a case study of CDOCKER—a CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J Comput Chem 24(13):1549–1562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Yue J, Gong X, Qian B, Wang H, Deng Y, Zhao Y (2014) Blueberry leaf extracts incorporated chitosan coatings for preserving post harvest quality of fresh blueberries. Postharvest Biol Technol 92:46–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. S. Santosh Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 279 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, H.S.S., Kumar, S.R., Kumar, N.N. et al. Molecular docking studies of gyrase inhibitors: weighing earlier screening bedrock. In Silico Pharmacol. 9, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40203-020-00064-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40203-020-00064-9

Keywords

Navigation