Abstract
Candida albicans, a ubiquitous opportunistic fungal pathogen, plays a pivotal role in human health and disease. As a commensal organism, it normally resides harmlessly within the human microbiota. However, under certain conditions, C. albicans can transition into a pathogenic state, leading to various infections collectively known as candidiasis. With the increasing prevalence of immunocompromised individuals and the widespread use of invasive medical procedures, candidiasis has become a significant public health concern. The emergence of drug-resistant strains further complicates treatment options, highlighting the urgent need for alternative therapeutic strategies. Antifungal peptides (AFPs) have gained considerable attention as potential candidates for combating Candida spp. infections. These naturally occurring peptides possess broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, including specific efficacy against C. albicans. AFPs exhibit several advantageous properties, such as rapid killing kinetics, low propensity for resistance development, and diverse mechanisms of action, making them promising alternatives to conventional antifungal agents. In recent years, extensive research has focused on discovering and developing novel AFPs with improved efficacy and selectivity against Candida species. Advances in biotechnology and synthetic peptide design have enabled the modification and optimization of natural peptides, enhancing their stability, bioavailability, and therapeutic potential. Nevertheless, several challenges must be addressed before AFPs can be widely implemented in clinical practice. These include optimizing peptide stability, enhancing delivery methods, overcoming potential toxicity concerns, and conducting comprehensive preclinical and clinical studies. This commentary presents a short overview of candidemia and AFP; articles and reviews published in the last 10 years were searched on The National Library of Medicine (National Center for Biotechnology Information–NIH–PubMed). The terms used were C. albicans infections, antimicrobial peptides, antifungal peptides, antifungal peptides mechanisms of action, candidemia treatments and guidelines, synthetic peptides and their challenges, and antimicrobial peptides in clinical trials as the main ones. Older publications were cited if they brought some relevant concept or helped to bring a perspective into our narrative. Articles older than 20 years and those that appeared in PubMed but did not match our goal to bring updated information about using antifungal peptides as an alternative to C. albicans infections were not considered.
Why carry out this study? |
This article aims to provide an overview of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), their mechanisms of action, and their potential applications in combating microbial infections |
AMPs are naturally occurring small polypeptides found in various organisms and have characteristics, including positive charges and hydrophobic/hydrophilic residues, that allow them to target microbial membranes with reduced toxicity to mammalian cells |
AMPs against fungi are called antifungal peptides (AFP), and this article provides an overview of AFPs, their mechanisms of action, and their potential applications in combating fungemia, especially against Candida albicans |
What was learned from the study? |
Some AFPs presented immunomodulatory responses by affecting cytokine production and immune cell activation, which can be further exploited as a possible therapeutic approach |
There are challenges associated with using AFPs as therapeutics. Issues to overcome include susceptibility to proteolytic degradation, interactions with ions, and toxicity, which researchers are addressing through protein engineering and other strategies |
Introduction
Members of the genus Candida are heterogeneous, being able to grow both as yeasts and in the more elongated yeast forms characterized by pseudohypha and pseudo-mycelium. It should be noted that only Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis can form true hyphae (true mycelium), these two species being considered polymorphic [1]. There are about 150 species of Candida spp., but only a small number have been considered human pathogens. These yeasts are part of the normal human microbiota and are found in mucous membranes (30–60%), gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of healthy people, and the yeast–host interaction occurs throughout life. Thus, it is possible that a person can encounter yeasts several times a day without major physiological complications [2,3,4]. Alterations in host defenses, however, constitute factors that may favor systemic invasion by Candida spp., representing the main agents involved in nosocomial infections with high mortality rates, especially in developing countries [5].
The epithelium and mucous membranes of the body constitute the primary barrier to preventing microorganism entry. Invasive infections happen when ruptures in these barriers occur and may be physical or associated with decreased immune response [6,7,8]. Fungi of the genus Candida can invade virtually all body parts, including superficial and deep organs [9]. Evidence suggests that tissue colonization can occur by hyphae in the endothelium and by the passage of yeast-like forms to adjacent tissues. Thus, the polymorphism of this microorganism is essential for the colonization and persistence of the infection [10, 11]. Hyphae formation is also a way for the fungus to adapt to the adverse conditions of different environments and their particularities in the same host [12, 13]. Among the environmental stimuli that favor the change from yeast to hypha we can mention the presence of serum at a temperature of 37 °C, neutral pH, 5% of carbon dioxide, and microaerophilic conditions [14, 15]. These stimuli can activate cAMP/PKA (cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine-monophosphate/protein kinase A) or MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase), leading to the activation and expression of genes related to hyphal formation, such as the transcription factors Efg1 (related to metabolic adaptions and morphogenesis) and Cph1, activation of the cell wall gene Hwp1 (hyphal wall protein 1), the agglutinin-like protein sequence Als3 (agglutinin-like sequence protein 3), and the secreted aspartic proteases (Sap) Sap4, Sap5, and Sap6, as well as Ece1, and Hyr1 hyphal-associated proteins [16,17,18]. Once formed, the hyphae produce other agglutinins (Als) by expressing the ALS gene (ALS1–7 and ALS9), which are considered surface proteins, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) linked to β-1,3-glycan of the fungal cell wall [19, 20]. The colonized tissue can serve as a source of dissemination of yeasts through the bloodstream. This process can occur in two ways already described: from the induction of endocytosis by host cells and the fungus’s active penetration. The first is an actin-dependent process in which the interaction of host receptors with fungal adhesins, such as Als3, stimulates endocytosis [16]. Active penetration, conversely, includes elongation of the hypha by intercellular junctions, exerting mechanical pressure in addition to the secretion of hydrolytic enzymes. Saps help in the degradation of E-cadherin, present in intercellular junctions, leading to the loss of endothelial integrity, a process aided by the secretion of mucins and phospholipases [21, 22].
Hematogenous dissemination of C. albicans can occur in immunosuppressed patients, especially in cases of neutropenia and those with critical clinical conditions [23]. In these patients, the source of contamination or persistence of infection may be associated with the formation of biofilms on medical devices, especially catheters, whose colonization can occur endogenously or exogenously from the hospital environment [24, 25]. Other risk factors are patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who undergo extensive abdominal surgeries or have renal failure, patients on hemodialysis or using broad-spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids, and total parenteral nutrition [26, 27].
Invasive candidiasis, also known as systemic candidiasis, candidemias, or hematogenous disseminated candidiasis, involves the spread of Candida spp. via the bloodstream to multiple organs: the brain, kidneys, heart, lungs, and liver [28, 29]. Overall, 40–60% of patients who develop candidemia fail to progress to cure, with high mortality due to late diagnosis and severity of comorbidities. Candidemia can also be frequent in neonates, whose immunity is not fully developed, making this group susceptible to a wide range of pathogens [30]. Another common manifestation of colonization or infection by Candida spp. in hospitalized patients is the presence of candiduria, defined by the presence of yeasts in the urine, which may indicate infectious processes in the kidneys, with high morbidity and mortality [31].
The success of infection and persistence in organisms is also related to fungal mechanisms capable of evading the host’s immune system. Among the virulence factors of C. albicans is the ability to adhere to host cells and to secrete degrading enzymes. These factors and host predispositions help to set up candidemia [22, 32]. The mechanism of action of each virulence factor and the sequence of events that culminate in systemic infection are still at the hypothesis stage [7]. Adhesion to host cells is related to the existence of molecules called adhesins (polysaccharides, glycoproteins, and lipids). Evidence suggests that adhesins guide the growth of hyphae along the grooves of tissue surfaces or devices that are in the patient’s body, such as catheters [33, 34]. Evidence also suggests that heat shock proteins are associated with the virulence process. The heat shock transcription factor 1 (Hsf1) and the heat shock chaperone Hsp90 coordinate the conformational change of chromatin and the expression of stress-associated genes, allowing an adaptation to the elevation of host temperature (fever), and participating in metabolic pathways that result in cell wall composition [35, 36]. The candidalysin peptide originates in the proteolytic processing of the protein originating from the ECE1 gene, processed by Kex2/Kex1, being just one of the eight potential peptides generated by Kex2. Candidalysin is also a virulence factor secreted by the invasive form of C. albicans, which can damage the membrane of host cells. Yeasts of C. albicans which express ECE1 tend to form hyphae for tissue adhesion, but without tissue damage or induction of a response to stimulation of the MAPK pathway [37, 38].
Patients with candidemia have a positive blood culture for Candida spp., and usually show signs of ongoing systemic infection, such as fever, hypotension, and tachycardia [39]. Patients with acute candidemia are considered if there is evidence of involvement of multiple non-contiguous organs. The colonization and infection of the urinary system is another possible indication of candidemia when the agent is isolated in urine culture [40,41,42]. Other possible clinical manifestations in fungemia include pyelonephritis, peritonitis, arthritis, hepatosplenic abscesses, myositis, macronodular lesions in the dermis, endophthalmitis, meningitis, and generalized systemic involvement [43, 44]. These clinical signs, however, may be related to other fungal and bacterial diseases; in cases of sepsis, the diagnosis and isolation of the infectious agent must therefore be performed with greater precision and in the shortest possible time [45, 46].
Blood culture is still considered the gold standard for diagnosing candidemia, and automated systems have been advocated for allowing monitoring of cultures every 10 min by colorimetric reactions in the medium (BacT/ALERT 3D, Organon Te Kinika Corp. Durham, NC), or by fluorescence (BACTEC 9240, Becton Dickinson, USA) [47]. Immunodiagnostic tests allow the detection of specific antibodies or fungal structures, such as anti-mannan antibodies, and immunofluorescent assays are used for detecting antibodies against germ tubes. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are used to detect antigens such as α-linked oligomannose residues, which make up 7% of the composition of the fungal wall, as well as 1,3-β-d-glucan, a polysaccharide also present in the fungi cell wall. Molecular diagnostic techniques include polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [48,49,50].
Candidemia can be treated with polyene antifungals (amphotericin B) and its derivative lipid formulations, azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole), and echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin). Amphotericin B was once considered the gold standard for candidemia and other invasive fungal infections. However, its use has become more limited because of nephrotoxicity and renal failure (49–65% of treated patients) as its most important side effects. Their lipid formulations have the same efficiency and less toxic side effects but with higher costs. Among the drugs available for treatment, fluconazole has the best oral absorption (close to 100%). It is not affected by gastric pH [51,52,53]. Its preferential use in the treatment of candidemia is also because fluconazole can concentrate in the urine, allowing the treatment of urinary infections caused by Candida spp. [54]. Echinocandins are the newest class of antifungals and act by inhibiting β-d-glucan synthase, thereby interfering in the synthesis of the fungal cell wall; echinocandins have high efficiency in invasive infections and are recommended as initial therapy based on high-quality evidence of an association with reduced mortality from patient-level analysis of randomized trial data [50, 55, 56]. Itraconazole, on the other hand, has limited use due to its low bioavailability when administered orally, with a high incidence of adverse effects and drug interactions [57, 58].
The increase in the incidence of candidemia is related to the increase in at-risk population, the performance of invasive procedures and the application of medical devices for continuous use (catheters), and the indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, in addition to the formulations used in chemotherapy [59]. Inappropriate antifungal therapy within 72 h and ICU admission are also associated with mortality in candidemia [60]. Among the control measures proposed to minimize the occurrence of these fungemias in hospital environments are an attempt to maintain patients only for the strictly necessary period, especially in ICUs, and promoting hygiene education aimed at patients, visitors, and health maintenance teams because Candida spp. can survive up to 45 min on hands after contamination, and can be transmitted by contact to contaminated surfaces [61, 62]. Additionally, the maintenance time of catheters and their management, as well as other medical devices, is crucial in the success of therapy against persistent candidemia. Evidence also suggests that candidemia is associated with therapeutic failures and emerging resistance to polyene and azole antifungals [50, 63].
Candida spp. accounts for 80% of nosocomial fungal infections [64]. Candidemia is the most common cause of hematogenous infections in the USA and the most frequent in patients infected during ICU treatment in many parts of the world [65]. According to Soulountsi et al. [66], 70–90% of fungal infections in ICU are invasive candidiasis, and 5–15% of patients are colonized by Candida spp. on ICU admission. The proportion of patients with candidemia who develop sepsis and septic shock from fungi is 8–30% and 23–38%, respectively. An increased length of ICU stay of 10.1 days was associated with a 14.5% increase in mortality, which was observed in a US epidemiological study with 30 cases per 100,000 admissions as the incidence of candidiasis [67, 68]. According to Pendrak et al. [69], two out of three cases of systemic Candida spp. infection are of hospital origin and the estimate of the total cases in the USA is 10,500–42,000. Furthermore, the mortality rate was estimated to be between 46% and 75% and there was high morbidity in patients who survived the infection. In patients who underwent liver transplantation, the mortality rate from Candida spp. was greater than 60% [7, 69, 70]. According to the North American program for research and control of pathogens of epidemiological importance (Surveillance and Control of Pathogens of Epidemiological Importance—SCOPE), of the 24,179 cases of systemic fungal infections diagnosed in 49 North American hospitals between the years 1995 and 2002, 4.6 per 10,000 cases were attributed to C. albicans, accounting for 9% of cases of hematogenous disseminated infections [70,71,72].
Despite medical advancements, the incidence of invasive fungal diseases is continuously on the rise [73, 74]. This concerning trend can be further aggravated by the expansion of endemic fungi and the emergence of new pathogens, both of which are consequences of climate change [75, 76]. The battle against fungal diseases poses a significant challenge due to the nature of the pathogens and the limited arsenal of antifungal drugs. The current repertoire of antifungal medications remains relatively narrow, with representative drug classes including azoles, polyenes, echinocandins, and pyrimidine analogues. However, these drugs often encounter fungal resistance and notable off-target effects [77, 78].
AMPs are a promising tool to enhance the drug arsenal against various microorganisms. Mechanisms of action, immunomodulatory activities, and use of protein engineering are briefly presented in the following text, as well as antifungal peptides (AFPs) against C. albicans and clinical trials and their challenges.
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs)
AMPs are small polypeptides (mostly positive charged, + 2 to + 7) with 2–50 amino acid residues isolated from virtually all life forms. Biologically, they are synthesized mainly in ribosomes and may undergo post-translational modifications, with current techniques of protein synthesis being used for the large-scale production of synthetic peptides [79]. AMPs are part of the organism’s innate immune response. Evidence suggests that the gene sequences that code for their syntheses have remained conserved throughout the evolution of organisms, with constitutive expression at basal levels and whose transcription possibly occurs as a result of contact or exposure to pathogens [80]. They generally have a broad spectrum of action against bacteria, viruses, and fungi. Some of the characteristics of these molecules corroborate their activity because they have a net charge, which is primarily positive, and have both hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues, which allow their solubilization in an aqueous medium and with the possibility of crossing hydrophobic membranes. Another point to be emphasized is that these characteristics privilege the interaction with the negatively charged membranes of microorganisms instead of the zwitterionic cell envelopes of mammals, thereby reducing the possibility of toxic effects of these molecules [81, 82]. The sequence and composition of amino acid residues, as well as the physical–chemical structure (total net charge, structural flexibility, size and percentage of hydrophobicity, and amphipathic characteristics), indicate that they are directly related to the activities of AMPs, especially concerning the interactions of these molecules both with the membranes of microorganisms and with the neutralization or interference in intracellular targets [83, 84]. This characteristic of AMPs confers an advantage since microbial resistance by gene mutation has been less likely [85]. It is also possible that AMPs favor the attraction of charged phospholipids to less thick and more fragile regions of the membrane, making it thinner. AMPs may also favor the oxidation of lipids through the generation of intermediate oxygen species and attract anions that may affect the membrane potential and, consequently, decrease the permeability of this structure to various molecules, thereby hindering cell metabolism [85]. Other forms of action of AMPs involve targets for DNA and protein synthesis, as well as protein folding, enzymatic activity, and cell wall synthesis [86, 87]. It is suggested, therefore, that AMPs significantly interfere with cell metabolism, which may lead to cell death from possible interactions with promoter genes and coding sequences, and they may interfere with enzymatic synthesis and protein folding [82, 83].
AMPs show great promise as molecules effective against various pathogens. The Database for Antimicrobial Activity and Structure of Peptides (DBAASP; https://dbaasp.org) was established in 2014 to serve as a comprehensive collection of published data on AMPs. It has a dual purpose, acting both as a repository for AMP-related literature and as a resource for supporting studies on the relationship between peptide structure and activity. Over time, DBAASP has undergone significant growth and enhancements. DBAASP is widely used in the research community and has contributed to developing other peptide-related databases. It offers predictive tools for designing peptides with desired antimicrobial properties, and its extensively curated data serves as a valuable source for building statistical models. DBAASP lists approximately 18,400 peptides, with 5967 targeting fungi. This specific group of AMPs, known as antifungal peptides (AFPs), includes compounds that combat Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and Cryptococcus neoformans [88, 89]. Like AMPs, AFPs exhibit their antimicrobial activity by interacting with the fungal membrane, resulting in the formation of pores using a barrel stave model, toroidal pore model, or through accumulation on the membrane until disruption occurs (Fig. 1). AFPs can also interact with intracellular targets, such as nucleic acids and chitins, with unknown mechanisms of action. Usually, AFPs are positively charged and tend to adopt secondary structures when associated with cell membranes. Also, the percentage of hydrophobic residues, length, and amphiphilicity affect their activity [90, 91].
AMPs involved in antimicrobial activity against bacteria and viruses have been widely studied, although therapeutic strategies to control fungal diseases with these molecules have still been limited [79]. The manipulation of the immune system for the development of vaccines against fungi, activation of the specific immune response directed to fungal agents (in the form of targeted stimulation of phagocytes, T cells, and antibodies), as well as the induction of the innate or adaptative immune response, with the manipulation of the profile of cytokines, constitute a challenge for therapeutic innovation, with data in the literature being less frequent than those found for bacteria and viruses [92, 93].
The literature reports around 887 AFPs with described fungicidal activity against C. albicans. Among the mechanisms of action, the induction of the formation of reactive oxygen species occurs with the histatin-5 (Hst-5) peptide and lactoferrin-derived peptides [93]. Hst-5 binds Candida spp. cell wall proteins (Ssa1/2) and glycans, which are taken by the fungal cell through fungal polyamine transporters. Once inside the cell, Hst-5 affects mitochondrial functions and causes oxidative stress, with volume dysregulation and ion imbalance triggered by osmotic stress leading to cell death [94]. Depletion of mitochondrial activity has also been observed in the peptide tenecin-3, capable of decreasing fungal cell viability when in contact with the cell cytoplasm [95]. Studies show that induction of actin depolarization is caused in fungal cells by a plant defensin called Phartibis nil antimicrobial peptide 1 (Pn-AMP1) [96, 97]. Synthetic peptides analogous to the neutrophil-derived CAP37 cationic domain have shown fungicidal activity against isolates of Candida spp., specifically C. albicans, C. guillhermondii, C. tropicalis, C. pseudotropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. dubliniensis [98]. The AMP dolabellanin B has been isolated from sea slugs Dolabella auricularia and showed antifungal activity against C. tropicalis, C. albicans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [99].
The use of AMPs in combination with drugs routinely used in therapy has been described, such as the P10 peptide (derived from the gp43 antigen of Paracoccidioides spp.) with amphotericin B and azoles (fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole), which was able to improve the survival of mice with respiratory tract infected with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis [100, 101]. Fais et al. [102] reported the synergistic activity of human lactoferrin-derived hLF1-11 peptide and caspofungin, yielding drastic caspofungin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) reduction and synergistic inhibition of biofilm formation by biofilm-producing strains of Candida spp., restoring sensitivity to caspofungin in caspofungin-resistant strains, both in free-living cells and in biofilms.
In addition to antimicrobial effects, AMPs can act as modulators of the immune response, participating at different cellular levels, interacting directly with immunogenic agents and modulating the inflammatory response [103]. This immunomodulation can occur through cellular processes such as modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, inhibition of the inflammatory response, chemotaxis and recruitment of macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils, differentiation of dendritic cells, activation of lymphocytes, presentation of antigens, angiogenesis, and healing of wounds [104,105,106]. These activities are proposed on the basis of studies and the observation that the concentration of peptides in vivo is lower than the MIC assays performed in vitro. Another proposed explanation is the possible synergistic action with other peptides. An example of this is the LL37 peptide, derived from a cathelicidin hCAP18, with 37 amino acids, whose sequence starts with two lysines and which has a broad spectrum of antimicrobial action. LL37 can act together with lysozyme and lactoferrin to potentiate their microbicidal activity. Peptides can also accumulate locally to reach the MIC concentration necessary to defeat a microorganism [107,108,109]. The indirect chemotactic activity of AMPs can occur by chemokine stimulation or cytokine secretion by different cell types through receptor-dependent mechanisms, such as what occurs with LL37, which optimizes interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 production from IL-1β [107]. Yang et al. [110] suggest that human α- and β-defensins are chemotactic for T cells and dendritic cells, respectively, and with β-defensins they can also stimulate the migration of keratinocytes, helping wound healing [104].
One of the synthetic AMPs that has been investigated for its antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activity based on similarities with innate defense regulators is IDR-1018, a cationic peptide with 12 amino acid residues (VRLIVAVRIWRR), with a molecular mass of 1536.9 Da, and resulting from mutations and deletions of the Bac2A peptide (a linear derivative of a cathelicidin bactenicin found in bovine neutrophils) [111,112,113]. Pena et al. [113] observed that this peptide induces an intermediate cytokine profile between the stages of differentiation of macrophages M1, with pro-inflammatory characteristics, and M2, with an anti-inflammatory profile and restoration of the plasticity of this group of phagocytic cells. IDR-1018 also increased MCP-1 and IL-10 levels of the bone marrow-derived macrophages cytokine profile challenged with heat-killed C. albicans antigens (HKCA), while suppressing tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12 levels. A murine model of experimental candidemia treated with IDR-1018 showed an increase in the survival rate as well as a diminished kidney fungal burden [114].
It should be noted that the active or passive involvement of the host’s immune system and the use of antimicrobial drugs is a preponderant factor in the response to infectious agents. Some of the plausible justifications are the fact that the reduction in the number of pathogens allows the immune system to clean up dead cells, help reduce the remaining pathogens and process deleterious metabolites excreted both by microorganisms and their death (such as the mycotoxins) and collateral tissue damage generated during the inflammatory process [115].
Despite the strategies used by different compounds to defeat microorganisms, they have mechanisms to adapt to drugs to which they were already susceptible, generating the phenomenon known as microbial resistance [53]. The use of AMPs is a promising therapeutic alternative. However, the spectrum of antimicrobial resistance to AMPs cannot be ruled out, even though it is less frequently described when compared to resistance found for drugs routinely used in medical practice. There are reports of bacteria that can become resistant to AMPs as a result of intrinsic characteristics or acquired by microorganisms [116]. The first can occur because of adaptation to the presence of AMPs in the environment in which the microorganisms are found or to the resistance induced by molecular modifications of the possible targets of AMPs, making them less susceptible. Microorganisms may be able to change the lipid composition of the cell membrane, in addition to the possible production of enzymes that can act in the proteolytic cleavage of AMPs [101, 117].
Systemic use of peptides has been an essential barrier to commercialization, especially because peptides are susceptible to proteolytic degradation, and interactions with ions and salt present in body fluids decrease the activity of AFPs and shorten their half-lives [118, 119]. Among the challenges of using AMPs are the possible loss of microbicidal activity of these molecules in the presence of biological concentrations of cations (Na+, Mg2,+ and Ca2+); it is proposed that, in certain situations, the immunomodulatory properties of the peptides are as essential as the antimicrobial activity in fighting infections in vivo [120]. Proteases are present in several physiological processes, and their performance can significantly reduce, or even inactivate, AMPs, which are subject to degradation by proteolytic enzymes present in the blood and elsewhere in the host [121, 122]. Human proteases and those produced by fungal pathogens are important in this process of AFP inactivation, e.g., C. albicans secreted aspartic proteases which can inactivate histatin-5 [123, 124]. Another challenge is toxicity, once AFPs need to be selective toward fungal cells over mammalian cells, and those with pore formation as a mechanism of action can be nonspecific once fungal and mammalian membranes are similar [119, 125].
A tool to overcome those limitations is protein engineering strategies, because the chemical synthesis of AFPs is expensive at large scale, and purification in natural sources does not fulfill the market needs. Rational design is based on knowledge of a peptide’s structure or function, which can improve antifungal activity and proteolytic and thermal stability [79], by introducing enantiomeric peptides and substitutions by amidated bridges [126, 127]. Other ways of protecting the AMPs involve modifications in the N- and C-terminal portions, as well as cyclic forms aiming to increase the stability of the peptides against physiological salt concentrations and the possibility of degradation by proteases [128,129,130].
Despite the high costs of isolation or chemical synthesis of AMPs, these molecules have aroused the interest of the pharmaceutical industry. Currently, peptides encounter difficulties in clinical trials due to their high susceptibility to degradation. However, strategies are being studied to overcome these difficulties, including nanotechnology and controlled drug delivery systems [131,132,133]. Examples of antifungal peptides currently on the market are echinocandins (lipopolypeptides), polymyxin B sulfate, used in infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and enfuvirtide (Fuzeon®), used in the treatment of AIDS [134,135,136].
Currently, about 80 peptides are commercially available in the USA. It is estimated that about 500 peptides are intended for clinical development and another 400–600 are in preclinical studies. A peptide becomes a good candidate for clinical trials and future commercialization if it has similar or better efficacy than drugs available on the market, as well as being tolerable with pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics that allow for fewer side effects and safe use in different presentations [137]. Possible production and marketing costs are also considered, so that about 90% of candidates for new therapies fail to meet all these requirements [138, 139]. The use of new technologies that allow the screening of peptide drugs with therapeutic potential enabled a 20% increase in peptides entering clinical phases, with more than 30% of those that enter clinical phase I targeting pain relief or with anticancer activity, and cardiovascular diseases; peptides for combating cancer dominate the phase II (15%) and phase III (40%) clinical trials, with the other peptides aimed at infectious and allergic diseases [140, 141]. Among the peptides currently in the clinical phase are Novexatin® (NP213), a synthetic cyclic peptide developed with positive results in phase IIb clinical trials for fungal nail infections via lysis of the fungal outer membrane; Omiganan (MBI-226; derived from bovine neutrophil indolicidin) for seborrheic dermatitis in phase II; PAC 113, a histatin derivative used as a mouth rinse for oral candidiasis; CZEN-002, for vulvovaginal candidiasis, with positive results in phase IIb [142, 143]; pexiganan (magainin) derived from Xenopus laevis, for the treatment of bacterial infections and foot ulcers caused by diabetes, and iseganan (IB-367), derived from porcine leukocytes for the treatment of stomatitis, both in phase I/II, but which were initially ignored because they present the same efficacy as drugs already available on the market for the same uses initially proposed for these peptides [144, 145]. Anti-Candida antifungal peptides in preclinical and clinical trials are extensively reviewed by Rodriguez-Castano et al. [79]. Antimicrobial peptides approved for clinical application and food storage are gramicidin D, gramicidin S, bacitracin, those for topical use against bacteria and also fungi (gramicidin S); nisin (as food preservative against Gram-positive bacteria); polymyxin B, colistin and daptomycin for intravenous use against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, all of them causing disruption of bacterial membrane as a mechanism of action [141, 143] (Table 1).
AFPs have a promising application in future therapy against fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida spp. Like AMPs, AFPs have a diverse mechanism of action, ranging from interactions with cell membranes to intracellular targets, as well as a role in immunomodulation. This article underscores the significant potential of AMPs, notably AFPs, as innovative alternatives to traditional antifungal medications, particularly in response to the growing concern surrounding drug-resistant fungal strains and the limitations of current therapeutic approaches. Moreover, it also discusses the challenges associated with utilizing AMPs, spanning challenges like proteolytic degradation, and ion interactions. With the prospect of AMP/AFP commercialization on the horizon, including those in various stages of clinical development, ongoing research and advances in biotechnology for the meticulous assessment and optimization of AMPs/AFPs are of paramount importance to facilitate their effective integration into clinical practice.
Data availability
All presented data are available on the articles used as references to write this commentary, researched at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NIH–PUBMED–https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), The Database for Antimicrobial Activity and Structure of Peptides (https://dbaasp.org) and ClinicalTrials.gov.
References
Noble SM, Gianetti BA, Witchley JN. Candida albicans cell-type switching and functional plasticity in the mammalian host. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(2):96–108.
Blanco JL, Garcia ME. Immune response to fungal infections. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2008;125(1–2):47–70.
Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Mycol. 2007;45(4):321–46.
da Fonseca STD, Teixeira TR, Ferreira JMS, Lima L, Luyten W, Castro AHF. Flavonoid-rich fractions of bauhinia holophylla leaves inhibit Candida albicans biofilm formation and hyphae growth. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(14):1796.
Salama OE, Gerstein AC. Differential response of Candida species morphologies and isolates to fluconazole and boric acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(5):e0240621.
Holzheimer RG, Dralle H. Management of mycoses in surgical patients—review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2002;7(5):200–26.
Lim CS, Rosli R, Seow HF, Chong PP. Candida and invasive candidiasis: back to basics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(1):21–31.
Arendrup MC. Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology. Dan Med J. 2013;60(11):B4698.
Sandven P. Epidemiology of candidemia. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2000;17(3):73–81.
Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Hoyer LL, McCormick T, Ghannoum MA. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(18):5385–94.
Wu X, Zhang S, Li H, et al. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans facilitates fungal infiltration and persister cell formation in vaginal candidiasis. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1117.
Hazan I, Sepulveda-Becerra M, Liu H. Hyphal elongation is regulated independently of cell cycle in Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(1):134–45.
Sudbery P, Gow N, Berman J. The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12(7):317–24.
Osman RB, Khoder G, Fayed B, Kedia RA, Elkareimi Y, Alharbi N. Influence of fabrication technique on adhesion and biofilm formation of Candida albicans to conventional, milled, and 3D-printed denture base resin materials: a comparative in vitro study. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(8):1836.
Kumamoto CA, Vinces MD. Alternative Candida albicans lifestyles: growth on surfaces. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:113–33.
Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence. 2013;4(2):119–28.
Prasad P, Tippana M. Morphogenic plasticity: the pathogenic attribute of Candida albicans. Curr Genet. 2023;69(2–3):77–89.
Chow EWL, Pang LM, Wang Y. From Jekyll to Hyde: the yeast-hyphal transition of Candida albicans. Pathogens. 2021;10(7):859.
Moyes DL, Richardson JP, Naglik JR. Candida albicans-epithelial interactions and pathogenicity mechanisms: scratching the surface. Virulence. 2015;6(4):338–46.
Lu Y, Su C, Liu H. Candida albicans hyphal initiation and elongation. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(12):707–14.
Dalle F, Wachtler B, L’Ollivier C, et al. Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12(2):248–71.
Jacobsen ID. The role of host and fungal factors in the commensal-to-pathogen transition of Candida albicans. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2023;10(2):55–65.
Corrêa-Junior D, Andrade IB, Alves V, Araújo GRS, Frases S. Clinical challenges of emerging and re-emerging yeast infections in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Microorganisms. 2022;10(11):2223.
Clark TA, Slavinski SA, Morgan J, et al. Epidemiologic and molecular characterization of an outbreak of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections in a community hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(10):4468–72.
Posteraro B, Torelli R, Vella A, et al. Pan-echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata bloodstream infection complicating COVID-19: a fatal case report. J Fungi (Basel). 2020;6(3):163.
Blumberg HM, Jarvis WR, Soucie JM, et al. Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(2):177–86.
Yamin DH, Husin A, Harun A. Risk factors of Candida parapsilosis catheter-related bloodstream infection. Front Public Health. 2021;9:631865.
Taei M, Chadeganipour M, Mohammadi R. An alarming rise of non-albicans Candida species and uncommon yeasts in the clinical samples; a combination of various molecular techniques for identification of etiologic agents. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):779.
Das S, Goswami AM, Saha T. An insight into the role of protein kinases as virulent factors, regulating pathogenic attributes in Candida albicans. Microb Pathog. 2022;164: 105418.
Chen YN, Hsu JF, Chu SM, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of neonates with candidemia and impacts of therapeutic strategies on the outcomes. J Fungi (Basel). 2022;8(5):465.
Barbosa VB, Rodrigues CF, Cerqueira L, Miranda JM, Azevedo NF. Microfluidics combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for Candida spp. detection. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:987669.
Salvatori O, Puri S, Tati S, Edgerton M. Innate immunity and saliva in Candida albicans-mediated oral diseases. J Dent Res. 2016;95(4):365–71.
Woolford CA, Lagree K, Xu W, et al. Bypass of Candida albicans filamentation/biofilm regulators through diminished expression of protein kinase Cak1. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(12):e1006487.
Do E, Cravener MV, Huang MY, May G, McManus CJ, Mitchell AP. Collaboration between antagonistic cell type regulators governs natural variation in the Candida albicans biofilm and hyphal gene expression network. MBio. 2022;13(5):e0193722.
Leach MD, Farrer RA, Tan K, et al. Hsf1 and Hsp90 orchestrate temperature-dependent global transcriptional remodelling and chromatin architecture in Candida albicans. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11704.
O’Meara TR, Alspaugh JA. The Cryptococcus neoformans capsule: a sword and a shield. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(3):387–408.
Sellam A, Whiteway M. Recent advances on Candida albicans biology and virulence. F1000Res. 2016;5:2582.
Naglik JR, Gaffen SL, Hube B. Candidalysin: discovery and function in Candida albicans infections. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;52:100–9.
Giolo MP, Svidzinski TIE. Fisiopatogenia, epidemiologia e diagnóstico laboratorial da candidemia. J Brasil Patol Med Lab. 2010;46:225.
Anaissie EJ, Darouiche RO, Abi-Said D, et al. Management of invasive candidal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23(5):964–72.
Rkieh L, El Nekidy WS, Alsoud LO, et al. Outcomes of caspofungin use in the treatment of Candida-related urinary tract infections, a case series. IDCases. 2022;28:e01510.
Aghili SR, Abastabar M, Soleimani A, Haghani I, Azizi S. High prevalence of asymptomatic nosocomial candiduria due to Candida glabrata among hospitalized patients with heart failure: a matter of some concern? Curr Med Mycol. 2020;6(4):1–8.
Fridkin SK, Jarvis WR. Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9(4):499–511.
Suleyman G, Alangaden GJ. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2021;35(4):1027–53.
Berzaghi R, Colombo AL, Machado AM, de Camargo ZP. New approach for diagnosis of candidemia based on detection of a 65-kilodalton antigen. Clin Vacc Immunol. 2009;16(11):1538–45.
Agnelli C, Guimarães T, Sukiennik T, et al. Prognostic trends and current challenges in candidemia: a comparative analysis of two multicenter cohorts within the past decade. J Fungi (Basel). 2023;9(4):468.
Ellepola AN, Morrison CJ. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Microbiol. 2005;43(Spec No):65–84.
Ahmad S, Khan Z. Invasive candidiasis: a review of nonculture-based laboratory diagnostic methods. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30(3):264–9.
Leon C, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Schuster M. What’s new in the clinical and diagnostic management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(6):808–19.
Barantsevich N, Barantsevich E. Diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(6):718.
Flevari A, Theodorakopoulou M, Velegraki A, Armaganidis A, Dimopoulos G. Treatment of invasive candidiasis in the elderly: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1199–208.
Bes DF, Rosanova MT, Sberna N, Arrizurieta E. Deoxycholate amphotericin B and nephrotoxicity in the pediatric setting. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(8):e198-206.
Osset-Trénor P, Pascual-Ahuir A, Proft M. Fungal drug response and antimicrobial resistance. J Fungi (Basel). 2023;9(5):565.
Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK, Calandra TF, Edwards JE. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:503.
Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, et al. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(8):1110–22.
Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):e1–50.
Allen D, Wilson D, Drew R, Perfect J. Azole antifungals: 35 years of invasive fungal infection management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(6):787–98.
Roy M, Karhana S, Shamsuzzaman M, Khan MA. Recent drug development and treatments for fungal infections. Braz J Microbiol. 2023;54:1695.
Sarkar S, Uppuluri P, Pierce CG, Lopez-Ribot JL. In vitro study of sequential fluconazole and caspofungin treatment against Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):1183–6.
Ngamchokwathana C, Chongtrakool P, Waesamaae A, Chayakulkeeree M. Risk factors and outcomes of non-Albicans candida bloodstream infection in patients with Candidemia at Siriraj Hospital—Thailand’s largest national tertiary referral hospital. J Fungi. 2021;7(4):269.
Zhang K, Li X, Yu C, Wang Y. Promising therapeutic strategies against microbial biofilm challenges. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:359.
Jahagirdar VLDM, Aradye SC, Nagoba BS. Candida species as potential nosocomial pathogens—a review. Electron J Gen Med. 2018;15(2):em05.
Janum S, Afshari A. Central venous catheter (CVC) removal for patients of all ages with candidaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD011195.
Fallas-Mora A, Díaz-Madriz JP, Chaverri-Fernández JM, Zavaleta-Monestel E. Evaluation of systemic antifungal use in a Latin American general care hospital: a retrospective study. Pharmacy (Basel). 2023;11(4):108.
Delaloye J, Calandra T. Invasive candidiasis as a cause of sepsis in the critically ill patient. Virulence. 2014;5(1):161–9.
Soulountsi V, Schizodimos T, Kotoulas SC. Deciphering the epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit: is it possible? Infection. 2021;49(6):1107–31.
Zaoutis TE, Argon J, Chu J, Berlin JA, Walsh TJ, Feudtner C. The epidemiology and attributable outcomes of candidemia in adults and children hospitalized in the United States: a propensity analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(9):1232–9.
Bourassa-Blanchette S, Biesheuvel MM, Lam JC, et al. Incidence, susceptibility and outcomes of candidemia in adults living in Calgary, Alberta, Canada (2010–2018). BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):100.
Pendrak ML, Yan SS, Roberts DD. Sensing the host environment: recognition of hemoglobin by the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;426(2):148–56.
Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(3):309–17.
Bouza E, Munoz P. Epidemiology of candidemia in intensive care units. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32(Suppl 2):S87–91.
Divyashree S, Shruthi B, Vanitha PR, Sreenivasa MY. Probiotics and their postbiotics for the control of opportunistic fungal pathogens: a review. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2023;38:e00800.
Kainz K, Bauer MA, Madeo F, Carmona-Gutierrez D. Fungal infections in humans: the silent crisis. Microb Cell. 2020;7(6):143–5.
Casadevall A. Immunity to invasive fungal diseases. Annu Rev Immunol. 2022;40:121–41.
Fisher MC, Gurr SJ, Cuomo CA, et al. Threats posed by the fungal kingdom to humans, wildlife, and agriculture. mBio. 2020;11(3):e00449-20.
van Rhijn N, Bromley M. The consequences of our changing environment on life threatening and debilitating fungal diseases in humans. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(5):367.
Perfect JR. The antifungal pipeline: a reality check. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(9):603–16.
Perfect JR, Krysan DJ, Del Poeta M, Selmecki AM, Brown JCS, Cowen LE. Editorial: antifungal pipeline: build it strong; build it better! Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:881272.
Rodriguez-Castano GP, Rosenau F, Standker L, Firacative C. Antimicrobial peptides: avant-garde antifungal agents to fight against medically important Candida species. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(3):789.
Mith O, Benhamdi A, Castillo T, et al. The antifungal plant defensin AhPDF1.1b is a beneficial factor involved in adaptive response to zinc overload when it is expressed in yeast cells. Microbiologyopen. 2015;4(3):409–22.
Teixeira V, Feio MJ, Bastos M. Role of lipids in the interaction of antimicrobial peptides with membranes. Prog Lipid Res. 2012;51(2):149–77.
da Cunha NB, Cobacho NB, Viana JFC, et al. The next generation of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as molecular therapeutic tools for the treatment of diseases with social and economic impacts. Drug Discov Today. 2017;22(2):234–48.
Scocchi M, Mardirossian M, Runti G, Benincasa M. Non-membrane permeabilizing modes of action of antimicrobial peptides on bacteria. Curr Top Med Chem. 2016;16(1):76–88.
Takada M, Ito T, Kurashima M, Matsunaga N, Demizu Y, Misawa T. Structure-activity relationship studies of substitutions of cationic amino acid residues on antimicrobial peptides. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;12(1):19.
Xuan J, Feng W, Wang J, et al. Antimicrobial peptides for combating drug-resistant bacterial infections. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;68:100954.
Petkovic M, Mouritzen MV, Mojsoska B, Jenssen H. Immunomodulatory properties of host defence peptides in skin wound healing. Biomolecules. 2021;11(7):952.
Le CF, Fang CM, Sekaran SD. Intracellular targeting mechanisms by antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(4):e02340-16.
Pirtskhalava M, Amstrong AA, Grigolava M, et al. DBAASP v3: database of antimicrobial/cytotoxic activity and structure of peptides as a resource for development of new therapeutics. Nucl Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D288–97.
Pirtskhalava M, Gabrielian A, Cruz P, et al. DBAASP vol 2: an enhanced database of structure and antimicrobial/cytotoxic activity of natural and synthetic peptides. Nucl Acids Res. 2016;44(13):6503.
Fernández de Ullivarri M, Arbulu S, Garcia-Gutierrez E, Cotter PD. Antifungal peptides as therapeutic agents. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:105.
Li T, Li L, Du F, et al. Activity and mechanism of action of antifungal peptides from microorganisms: a review. Molecules. 2021;26(11):3438.
Zhang Z, Bills GF, An Z. Advances in the treatment of invasive fungal disease. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(5):e1011322.
Qadri H, Shah AH, Alkhanani M, Almilaibary A, Mir MA. Immunotherapies against human bacterial and fungal infectious diseases: a review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1135541.
Puri S, Edgerton M. How does it kill?: understanding the candidacidal mechanism of salivary histatin 5. Eukaryot Cell. 2014;13(8):958–64.
Bondaryk M, Staniszewska M, Zielińska P, Urbańczyk-Lipkowska Z. Natural antimicrobial peptides as inspiration for design of a new generation antifungal compounds. J Fungi (Basel). 2017;3(3):46.
Koo JC, Lee B, Young ME, et al. Pn-AMP1, a plant defense protein, induces actin depolarization in yeasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45(11):1669–80.
Slezina MP, Odintsova TI. Plant antimicrobial peptides: insights into structure-function relationships for practical applications. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45(4):3674–704.
Pereira HA, Tsyshevskaya-Hoover I, Hinsley H, et al. Candidacidal activity of synthetic peptides based on the antimicrobial domain of the neutrophil-derived protein, CAP37. Med Mycol. 2010;48(2):263–72.
Iijima R, Kisugi J, Yamazaki M. A novel antimicrobial peptide from the sea hare Dolabella auricularia. Dev Comp Immunol. 2003;27(4):305–11.
de Oliveira HC, Assato PA, Marcos CM, et al. Paracoccidioides-host interaction: an overview on recent advances in the paracoccidioidomycosis. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1319.
Freitas CG, Franco OL. Antifungal peptides with potential against pathogenic fungi. In: Basak A, Chakraborty R, Mandal SM, editors. Recent trends in antifungal agents and antifungal therapy. New Delhi: Springer India; 2016. p. 75–95.
Fais R, Rizzato C, Franconi I, Tavanti A, Lupetti A. Synergistic activity of the human lactoferricin-derived peptide hLF1-11 in combination with caspofungin against Candida species. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e0124022.
Otvos L Jr. Immunomodulatory effects of anti-microbial peptides. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2016;63(3):257–77.
Niyonsaba F, Ushio H, Nakano N, et al. Antimicrobial peptides human beta-defensins stimulate epidermal keratinocyte migration, proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(3):594–604.
Yanashima K, Chieosilapatham P, Yoshimoto E, Okumura K, Ogawa H, Niyonsaba F. Innate defense regulator IDR-1018 activates human mast cells through G protein-, phospholipase C-, MAPK- and NF-κB-sensitive pathways. Immunol Res. 2017;65(4):920–31.
John JV, Sharma NS, Tang G, et al. Nanofiber aerogels with precision macrochannels and LL-37-mimic peptides synergistically promote diabetic wound healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(1):2206936.
Yu J, Mookherjee N, Wee K, et al. Host defense peptide LL-37, in synergy with inflammatory mediator IL-1beta, augments immune responses by multiple pathways. J Immunol. 2007;179(11):7684–91.
Lai Y, Gallo RL. AMPed up immunity: how antimicrobial peptides have multiple roles in immune defense. Trends Immunol. 2009;30(3):131–41.
Leite ML, Duque HM, Rodrigues GR, da Cunha NB, Franco OL. The LL-37 domain: a clue to cathelicidin immunomodulatory response? Peptides. 2023;165:171011.
Yang D, Chertov O, Oppenheim JJ. Participation of mammalian defensins and cathelicidins in anti-microbial immunity: receptors and activities of human defensins and cathelicidin (LL-37). J Leukoc Biol. 2001;69(5):691–7.
Wieczorek M, Jenssen H, Kindrachuk J, et al. Structural studies of a peptide with immune modulating and direct antimicrobial activity. Chem Biol. 2010;17(9):970–80.
Niyonsaba F, Madera L, Afacan N, Okumura K, Ogawa H, Hancock RE. The innate defense regulator peptides IDR-HH2, IDR-1002, and IDR-1018 modulate human neutrophil functions. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;94(1):159–70.
Pena OM, Afacan N, Pistolic J, et al. Synthetic cationic peptide IDR-1018 modulates human macrophage differentiation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e52449.
Freitas CG, Lima SMF, Freire MS, et al. An immunomodulatory peptide confers protection in an experimental candidemia murine model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(8):e02518-16.
Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. Immunoglobulins in defense, pathogenesis, and therapy of fungal diseases. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11(5):447–56.
Maria-Neto S, de Almeida KC, Macedo ML, Franco OL. Understanding bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides: from the surface to deep inside. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1848(11 Pt B):3078–88.
Espinel-Ingroff A, Cantón E, Pemán J. Antifungal resistance among less prevalent candida non-albicans and other yeasts versus established and under development agents: a literature review. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(1):24.
Ciociola T, Giovati L, Conti S, Magliani W, Santinoli C, Polonelli L. Natural and synthetic peptides with antifungal activity. Future Med Chem. 2016;8(12):1413–33.
Konakbayeva D, Karlsson AJ. Strategies and opportunities for engineering antifungal peptides for therapeutic applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2023;81:102926.
Bowdish DM, Davidson DJ, Lau YE, Lee K, Scott MG, Hancock RE. Impact of LL-37 on anti-infective immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;77(4):451–9.
Tang L, Persky AM, Hochhaus G, Meibohm B. Pharmacokinetic aspects of biotechnology products. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(9):2184–204.
Katsila T, Siskos AP, Tamvakopoulos C. Peptide and protein drugs: the study of their metabolism and catabolism by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2012;31(1):110–33.
Chadha S. Combating fungal phytopathogens with human salivary antimicrobial peptide histatin 5 through a multi-target mechanism. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;39(8):215.
Lee AC, Harris JL, Khanna KK, Hong JH. A comprehensive review on current advances in peptide drug development and design. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2383.
Rautenbach M, Troskie AM, Vosloo JA. Antifungal peptides: to be or not to be membrane active. Biochimie. 2016;130:132–45.
de la Fuente-Nunez C, Reffuveille F, Mansour SC, et al. D-enantiomeric peptides that eradicate wild-type and multidrug-resistant biofilms and protect against lethal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Chem Biol. 2015;22(2):196–205.
da Silva CM, de Carvalho AMR, Macedo DPC, Juca MB, Amorim RJM, Neves RP. Candidemia in Brazilian neonatal intensive care units: risk factors, epidemiology, and antifungal resistance. Braz J Microbiol. 2023;54:817.
Tugyi R, Uray K, Iván D, Fellinger E, Perkins A, Hudecz F. Partial D-amino acid substitution: improved enzymatic stability and preserved Ab recognition of a MUC2 epitope peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(2):413–8.
Cline LL, Waters ML. The structure of well-folded beta-hairpin peptides promotes resistance to peptidase degradation. Biopolymers. 2009;92(6):502–7.
Knappe D, Henklein P, Hoffmann R, Hilpert K. Easy strategy to protect antimicrobial peptides from fast degradation in serum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(9):4003–5.
Jenssen H, Hancock RE. Therapeutic potential of HDPs as immunomodulatory agents. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;618:329–47.
Fox JL. Antimicrobial peptides stage a comeback. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(5):379–82.
Jain A, Shah SG, Chugh A. Cell penetrating peptides as efficient nanocarriers for delivery of antifungal compound, natamycin for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Pharm Res. 2015;32(6):1920–30.
Craik DJ, Fairlie DP, Liras S, Price D. The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;81(1):136–47.
Hamzeh-Mivehroud M, Alizadeh AA, Morris MB, Church WB, Dastmalchi S. Phage display as a technology delivering on the promise of peptide drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18(23–24):1144–57.
Farrag HN, Shimooka H, Kitamura M. Review of the specific features, and new demands for antibacterial peptides. J UOEH. 2023;45(1):1–7.
Muttenthaler M, King GF, Adams DJ, Alewood PF. Trends in peptide drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(4):309–25.
Kosikowska P, Lesner A. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as drug candidates: a patent review (2003–2015). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2016;26(6):689–702.
Khalily MP, Soydan M. Peptide-based diagnostic and therapeutic agents: where we are and where we are heading? Chem Biol Drug Des. 2023;101(3):772–93.
Kaspar AA, Reichert JM. Future directions for peptide therapeutics development. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18(17–18):807–17.
Dijksteel GS, Ulrich MMW, Middelkoop E, Boekema B. Review: lessons learned from clinical trials using antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Front Microbiol. 2021;12:616979.
Greber KE, Dawgul M. Antimicrobial peptides under clinical trials. Curr Top Med Chem. 2017;17(5):620–8.
Jiang Y, Chen Y, Song Z, Tan Z, Cheng J. Recent advances in design of antimicrobial peptides and polypeptides toward clinical translation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;170:261–80.
Moore A. The big and small of drug discovery. EMBO Rep. 2003;4(2):114–7.
Giles FJ, Rodriguez R, Weisdorf D, et al. A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of iseganan for the reduction of stomatitis in patients receiving stomatotoxic chemotherapy. Leuk Res. 2004;28(6):559–65.
Mercer DK, Robertson JC, Miller L, Stewart CS, O’Neil DA. NP213 (Novexatin®): a unique therapy candidate for onychomycosis with a differentiated safety and efficacy profile. Med Mycol. 2020;58(8):1064–72.
Talapko J, Meštrović T, Juzbašić M, et al. Antimicrobial peptides–mechanisms of action, antimicrobial effects and clinical applications. Antibiotics. 2022;11(10):1417.
Rousel J, Saghari M, Pagan L, et al. Treatment with the topical antimicrobial peptide omiganan in mild-to-moderate facial seborrheic dermatitis versus ketoconazole and placebo: results of a randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):14315.
Koo HB, Seo J. Antimicrobial peptides under clinical investigation. Pept Sci. 2019;111(5):e24122.
Mercer DK, O’Neil DA. Innate inspiration: antifungal peptides and other immunotherapeutics from the host immune response. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2177.
Funding
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. The journal’s fee was waived.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Camila Guimarães de Freitas and Maria Sueli Felipe both contributed to drafting and revising the manuscript and approved the final version prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
Camila Guimarães de Freitas and Maria Sueli Felipe have nothing to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Freitas, C.G., Felipe, M.S. Candida albicans and Antifungal Peptides. Infect Dis Ther 12, 2631–2648 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-023-00889-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-023-00889-9