Skip to main content
Log in

“Organization” as Setting Boundaries of Individual Development

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Development” suggests that there is something that is developing, or changing over time. We can ask about temporal boundaries of that developmental process, asking when development begins or ends and whether it has defined stages along the way, for example. We can ask about spatial boundaries as well: where does the developing object start and end? For this article, I ask about the boundary definition of the developing organism in particular. What is an individual organism, and what defines it as the same organism as it changes over time? In particular, how has this been answered historically: how have researchers described and explained what an individual developing organism is? This article explores ideas and approaches especially starting in the late 19th century, and in particular looks at the role of “organization.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Child CM (1915a) Individuality in organism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Child CM (1915b) Senescence and rejuvenescence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Driesch H (1891–1892) Entwicklungsmechanische Studien. I. Der Werth der beiden ersten Furchungszellen in der Echinodermentwicklung. Experimentelle Erzeugen von Theil- und Doppelbildung. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 53:160–178. (Translated in: Willier B, Oppenheimer JM, (eds) (1964) Foundations of experimental embryology. Hafner, New York, pp 38–50)

  • Hamburger V (1988) The heritage of experimental embryology. Hans Spemann and the organizer. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (1976) Crystals, fabrics, and fields: metaphors of organicism in twentieth-century developmental biology. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1910) The outgrowth of the nerve fiber as a mode of protoplasmic movement. J Exp Zool 9:787–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1937) Embryology and its relations. Science 85:369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtfreter J (1991) Reminiscences on the life and work of Johannes Holtfreter. In: Gilbert SF (ed) A conceptual history of modern embryology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 109–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplane L (2011) Stem cells and the temporal boundaries of development: Toward a species-dependent view. Biol Theory. doi:10.1007/s13752-011-0009-z

  • Laubichler MD, Davidson EH (2008) Boveri’s long experiment: Sea urchin merogones and the establishment of the role of nuclear chromosomes in development. Dev Biol 314:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb J (1916) The organism as a whole. Putnam, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein J (1991) Transforming traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz B (1962) Formation of genetically mosaic mouse embryos. Am Zool 2:432

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan TH (1901) Regeneration. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham J (1931) Chemical embryology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham J (1942) Biochemistry and morphogenesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradeu T (2011). A mixed self: The role of symbiosis in development. Biol Theory. doi:10.1007/s13752-011-0011-5

  • Roux W (1888) Beiträge zur Entwickelungsmechanik des Embryo, No. 5. Über die künstliche Hervorbringung halber Embryonen durch Zerstörung einer der beiden ersten Furchungskugeln, sowie über die Nachentwickelung (Postgeneration) der fehlenden Körperhälfte. Virchow’s Archiv fürPathologisches Anatomie und Physiologie und klinische Medizin 114:113–153. (Translated in: Willier B, Oppenheimer JM (eds) (1964) Foundations of experimental embryology. Hafner, New York, pp 2–37)

  • Spemann H (1938) Embryonic development and induction. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens L (1970) The development of transplantable teratocarcinomas from intratesticular grafts of pre- and postimplantation mouse embryos. Dev Biol 21:364–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman CO (1894) Evolution and epigenesis. Biological lectures delivered at the Marine Biological Laboratory 1893. Ginn, Boston, pp 205–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EB (1896) The cell in development and inheritance. Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

With thanks to Manfred Laubichler and Richard Creath, and the National Science Foundation for support through numerous grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Maienschein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maienschein, J. “Organization” as Setting Boundaries of Individual Development. Biol Theory 6, 73–79 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-011-0006-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-011-0006-2

Keywords

Navigation