Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Obliterative Surgery for Vaginal Prolapse: An Update

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Current Geriatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common diagnosis especially within the older female population. There are many options for treatment; this article provides a comprehensive review of new and contributory literature on obliterative surgeries as well as a review of their unique advantages and disadvantages compared to non-surgical options and other reconstructive surgeries.

Recent Findings

Recent literature on obliterative surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse provides further information on body image, post-operative regret, and sexual function after obliterative surgery. In addition, a unique post-operative complication of de novo rectal prolapse is highlighted.

Summary

Obliterative surgery is a valuable option for an older woman with pelvic organ prolapse who may benefit from a shorter and safer surgery that provides a durable repair. These patients must be appropriately screened and informed of the loss of ability to have penetrative vaginal intercourse, possible intraoperative complications, the impact on body image, as well as the risk de novo rectal prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Vespa J, Medina L, Armstrong DM. Demographic turning points for the United States: Population. In: Census.Gov. 2020. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2022.

  2. Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health initiative: Gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, Colling J, Clark A. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):1027–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. •• Jones KA, Zhuo Y, Solak S, Harmanli O. Hysterectomy at the time of colpocleisis: A decision analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;27:805–10. Current evaluation of decision making for hysterectomy at time of colpocleisis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Meriwether K. Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26:173–201. Most current report on terminology of obliterative vaginal surgeries.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colpocleisis - Your Pelvic Floor. IUGA. Available at: https://www.yourpelvicfloor.org/media/Colpocleisis_English_RV2.pdf.

  9. DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176(6):1228–1232; discussion 1232–1235.

  10. Krissi H, Aviram A, Ram E, Eitan R, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Colpocleisis surgery in women over 80 years old with severe triple compartment pelvic organ prolapse. Euro J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;195:206–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P.Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (pop-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. In: J Med Life. 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056425/.

  12. Clinical frailty scale - statpearls - NCBI bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559009/. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.

  13. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular circulation. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000106. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.

  14. Kumar C, Salzman B, Colburn J. Preoperative assessment in older adults: A comprehensive approach. In: Am Family Phys. 2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30215973/.

  15. Mueller MG, Ellimootil C, Abernethy MG, Mueller ER, Hohmann S, Kenton K. Colpocleisis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21:30–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. • Alshankiti H, Houlihan S, Robert M. Incidence and contributing factors of perioperative complications in surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1945–53. Current report of risk factors and perioperative complications for POP surgeries.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Collins SA, Jelovsek JE, Chen CC, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Barber MD. De novo rectal prolapse after obliterative and reconstructive vaginal surgery for urogenital prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah NM, Berger AA, Zhuang Z, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Altman D, Zetterstrom J, Schultz I, Nordenstam J, Hjern F, Lopez A, Mellgren A. Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapse: A population-based case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:28–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. von Pechmann WS, Mutone M, Fyffe J, Hale DS. Total colpocleisis with high levator plication for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. •• Grzybowska ME, Futyma K, Kusiak A, Wydra DG. Colpocleisis as an obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: Is it still a viable option in the twenty-first century? narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;33:31–46. Current review of obliterative vaginal surgery literature.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Harmanli O, Celik H, Jones KA, Yadav P, Myers T. Minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer after Lefort Colpocleisis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19:242–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frick AC, Walters MD, Larkin KS, Barber MD. Risk of unanticipated abnormal gynecologic pathology at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hanson GE, Keettel WC. The Neugebauer–Le Fort operation. A review of 288 colpocleises. Obstet Gynecol 1969;34(3):352–357.

  25. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24:102–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. van Hanegem N, Breijer MC, Slockers SA, et al (2016) Diagnostic workup for postmenopausal bleeding: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International J Obst Gynaecol. 124:231–240.

  27. •• Kandadai P, Flynn M, Zweizig S, Patterson D. Cost-utility of routine endometrial evaluation before Le Fort Colpocleisis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20:168–73. Report on endometrial evaluation prior to uterine-sparing obliterative vaginal surgery.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Crisp CC, Book NM, Smith AL, Cunkelman JA, Mishan V, Treszezamsky AD, Adams SR, Apostolis C, Lowenstein L, Pauls RN. Body image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deval B. Hysterocolpectomy with colpocleisis for massive genital prolapse in women aged over 70 years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biol. 2005;123:249–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. •• Winkelman WD, Haviland MJ, Elkadry EA. Long-term pelvic floor symptoms, recurrence, satisfaction, and regret following colpocleisis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;26:558–62. Current report of long-term outcomes for obliterative vaginal surgeries.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, Bradley CS, Ye W, Visco AC, Cundiff GW, Zyczynski HM, Fine P, Weber AM. Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1603–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Felder L, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Kavvadias T. How does colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in older women affect quality of life, body image, and sexuality? A critical review of the literature. Womens Health. 2022;18:174550572211110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Alabama Birmingham, Urogynecology and Female Pelvic Reconstruction, 1700 6th Avenue South, 176F STE 10382, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7333, USA

    Max Cadena & Gena Dunivan

Authors
  1. Max Cadena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gena Dunivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Cadena.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Max Cadena and Gena Dunivan each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cadena, M., Dunivan, G. Obliterative Surgery for Vaginal Prolapse: An Update. Curr Geri Rep 12, 22–27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-023-00382-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-023-00382-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation