Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limitations with the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) with Special Attention to Plant-Based Diets: a Review

  • Diabetes and Obesity (CB Chan, Section Editor
  • Published:
Current Nutrition Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review describes several limitations of the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) with a focus on its application to plant-based dietary patterns.

Recent Findings

Evaluating protein quality in terms of digestibility is paramount to support and optimize the health and well-being of human populations in situations where food insecurity and protein energy malnutrition are widespread. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations has endorsed the DIAAS to replace the previously recommended Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) for protein quality assessment.

Summary

While multiple strengths characterize the DIAAS, substantial limitations remain, many of which are accentuated in the context of a plant-based dietary pattern. Some of these limitations include a failure to translate differences in nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors between plant- and animal-based foods, limited representation of commonly consumed plant-based foods within the scoring framework, inadequate recognition of the increased digestibility of commonly consumed heat-treated and processed plant-based foods, its formulation centered on fast-growing animal models rather than humans, and a focus on individual isolated foods vs the food matrix. The DIAAS is also increasingly being used out of context where its application could produce erroneous results such as exercise settings. When investigating protein quality, particularly in a plant-based dietary context, the DIAAS should ideally be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

N/A

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian dietary guidelines. 2013 Canberra.

  2. Health Canada. Canada’s dietary guidelines. Health Canada. 2019 Canada.

  3. DeSalvo KB, Olson R, Casavale KO. Dietary guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2016;315(5):457–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Papier K, Tong TY, Appleby PN, Bradbury KE, Fensom GK, Knuppel A, et al. Comparison of major protein-source foods and other food groups in meat-eaters and non-meat-eaters in the EPIC-Oxford cohort. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Orlich MJ, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabaté J, Fan J, Singh PN, Fraser GE. Patterns of food consumption among vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(10):1644–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Segovia-Siapco G, Burkholder-Cooley N, Haddad TS, Sabaté J. Beyond meat: a comparison of the dietary intakes of vegetarian and non-vegetarian adolescents. Front Nutr. 2019;6:86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang R-Y, Huang C-C, Hu FB, Chavarro JE. Vegetarian diets and weight reduction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(1):109–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinu M, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A, Sofi F. Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(17):3640–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee Y, Park K. Adherence to a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrients. 2017;9(6):603.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Craddock JC, Neale EP, Peoples GE, Probst YC. Vegetarian-based dietary patterns and their relation with inflammatory and immune biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(3):433–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker HW, Vadiveloo MK. Diet quality of vegetarian diets compared with nonvegetarian diets: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(3):144–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang F, Zheng J, Yang B, Jiang J, Fu Y, Li D. Effects of vegetarian diets on blood lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(10):e002408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Li D. Chemistry behind vegetarianism. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(3):777–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rizzo NS, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabate J, Fraser GE. Nutrient profiles of vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(12):1610–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schüpbach R, Wegmüller R, Berguerand C, Bui M, Herter-Aeberli I. Micronutrient status and intake in omnivores, vegetarians and vegans in Switzerland. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56(1):283–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sobiecki JG, Appleby PN, Bradbury KE, Key TJ. High compliance with dietary recommendations in a cohort of meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, and vegans: results from the European prospective investigation into Cancer and nutrition–Oxford study. Nutr Res. 2016;36(5):464–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Calder PC, Ahluwalia N, Brouns F, Buetler T, Clement K, Cunningham K, et al. Dietary factors and low-grade inflammation in relation to overweight and obesity. Br J Nutr. 2011;106(S3):S1–S78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuhrman J, Ferreri DM. Fueling the vegetarian (vegan) athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010;9(4):233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt JA, Rinaldi S, Scalbert A, Ferrari P, Achaintre D, Gunter MJ, et al. Plasma concentrations and intakes of amino acids in male meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans: a cross-sectional analysis in the EPIC-Oxford cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(3):306–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melina V, Craig W, Levin S. Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: vegetarian diets. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(12):1970–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner CD, Hartle JC, Garrett RD, Offringa LC, Wasserman AS. Maximizing the intersection of human health and the health of the environment with regard to the amount and type of protein produced and consumed in the United States. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(4):197–215.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Boye J, Wijesinha-Bettoni R, Burlingame B. Protein quality evaluation twenty years after the introduction of the protein digestibility corrected amino acid score method. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(S2):S183–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition: report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. World Health Organization. 2007 Geneva.

  24. WHO/FAO. Protein quality evaluation: report of Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 51. 1991 Rome, Italy.

  25. Katz DL, Doughty KN, Geagan K, Jenkins DA, Gardner CD. Perspective: the public health case for modernizing the definition of protein quality. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(5):755–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathai JK, Liu Y, Stein HH. Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS). Br J Nutr. 2017;117(4):490–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abelilla JJ, Liu Y, Stein HH. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) in oat protein concentrate measured in 20-to 30-kilogram pigs. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98(1):410–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips SM. Current concepts and unresolved questions in dietary protein requirements and supplements in adults. Front Nutr. 2017;4:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. FAO Expert Consultation. Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. 2011 Auckland, New Zealand.

  30. Rutherfurd SM, Fanning AC, Miller BJ, Moughan PJ. Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. J Nutr. 2015;145(2):372–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. • Burd NA, Beals JW, Martinez IG, Salvador AF, Skinner SK. Food-first approach to enhance the regulation of post-exercise skeletal muscle protein synthesis and remodeling. Sports Med. 2019;49(1):59–68 This article describes limitations of focusing on isolated protein sources instead of the characteristics of the protein within the food matrix. Further, it depicts concepts related to protein quality and postprandial muscle protein synthesis in the context of the food matrix.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lupton JR, Brooks J, Butte N, Caballero B, Flatt J, Fried S. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids, vol. 5. Washington: National Academy Press; 2002. p. 589–768.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yamaguchi, M. Determination of the nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor in cereals. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF, editors. Seed Analysis. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 95–107.

  34. Mariotti F, Tomé D, Mirand PP. Converting nitrogen into protein—beyond 6.25 and Jones’ factors. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008;48(2):177–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ciuris C, Lynch HM, Wharton C, Johnston CS. A comparison of dietary protein digestibility, based on DIAAS scoring, in vegetarian and non-vegetarian athletes. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):3016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gorissen SH, Crombag JJ, Senden JM, Waterval WH, Bierau J, Verdijk LB, et al. Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. Amino Acids. 2018;50(12):1685–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Marinangeli CP, House JD. Potential impact of the digestible indispensable amino acid score as a measure of protein quality on dietary regulations and health. Nutr Rev. 2017;75(8):658–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. •• Wolfe RR, Rutherfurd SM, Kim I-Y, Moughan PJ. Protein quality as determined by the digestible indispensable amino acid score: evaluation of factors underlying the calculation. Nutr Rev. 2016;74(9):584–99 This review article provides a summary of the underpinning factors involved in the calculation of the DIAAS whilst also describing potential errors in the calculation process.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rand WM, Pellett PL, Young VR. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(1):109–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Deglaire A, Bos C, Tomé D, Moughan PJ. Ileal digestibility of dietary protein in the growing pig and adult human. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(12):1752–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rowan AM, Moughan P, Wilson M, Maher K, Tasman-Jones C. Comparison of the ileal and faecal digestibility of dietary amino acids in adult humans and evaluation of the pig as a model animal for digestion studies in man. Br J Nutr. 1994;71(1):29–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Millward DJ. Human amino acid requirements. J Nutr. 1997;127(9):1842–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cervantes-Pahm S, Stein H. Effect of dietary soybean oil and soybean protein concentration on the concentration of digestible amino acids in soybean products fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(8):1841–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fernstrom JD. Branched-chain amino acids and brain function. J Nutr. 2005;135(6):1539S–46S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. The protein-sparing action of carbohydrates. JAMA. 1916;LXVII(17):1233. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1916.02590170041017

  46. • Mariotti F, Gardner CD. Dietary protein and amino acids in vegetarian diets - a review. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2661 This article provides an important summary about what we know concerning protein adequacy and amino acid intake by populations following vegetarian-based diets.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tomé D. Digestibility issues of vegetable versus animal proteins: protein and amino acid requirements—functional aspects. Food Nutr Bull. 2013;34(2):272–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jacobs DR, Gross MD, Tapsell LC. Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1543S–8S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Burd NA, Gorissen SH, Van Vliet S, Snijders T, Van Loon LJ. Differences in postprandial protein handling after beef compared with milk ingestion during postexercise recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):828–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Van Vliet S, Shy EL, Abou Sawan S, Beals JW, West DW, Skinner SK, et al. Consumption of whole eggs promotes greater stimulation of postexercise muscle protein synthesis than consumption of isonitrogenous amounts of egg whites in young men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(6):1401–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Elliot TA, Cree MG, Sanford AP, Wolfe RR, Tipton KD. Milk ingestion stimulates net muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(4):667–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Berrazaga I, Micard V, Gueugneau M, Walrand S. The role of the anabolic properties of plant-versus animal-based protein sources in supporting muscle mass maintenance: a critical review. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Nkhata SG, Ayua E, Kamau EH, Shingiro JB. Fermentation and germination improve nutritional value of cereals and legumes through activation of endogenous enzymes. Food Sci Nutr. 2018;6(8):2446–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Moore DR, Robinson MJ, Fry JL, Tang JE, Glover EI, Wilkinson SB, et al. Ingested protein dose response of muscle and albumin protein synthesis after resistance exercise in young men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(1):161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tang JE, Hartman JW, Phillips SM. Increased muscle oxidative potential following resistance training induced fibre hypertrophy in young men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;31(5):495–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hartman JW, Tang JE, Wilkinson SB, Tarnopolsky MA, Lawrence RL, Fullerton AV, et al. Consumption of fat-free fluid milk after resistance exercise promotes greater lean mass accretion than does consumption of soy or carbohydrate in young, novice, male weightlifters. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(2):373–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Burd NA, McKenna CF, Salvador AF, Paulussen KJ, Moore DR. Dietary protein quantity, quality, and exercise are key to healthy living: a muscle-centric perspective across the lifespan. Front Nutr. 2019;6:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Pinckaers PJ, Weijzen ME, Houben LH, Zorenc AH, Kouw IW, Groot LC, et al. The muscle protein synthetic response following ingestion of corn protein, milk protein and their protein blend in young males. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020;4(Supp-2):651.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, Parise G, Bellamy L, Baker SK, Smith K, et al. Acute post-exercise myofibrillar protein synthesis is not correlated with resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy in young men. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tang JE, Moore DR, Kujbida GW, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM. Ingestion of whey hydrolysate, casein, or soy protein isolate: effects on mixed muscle protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in young men. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(3):987–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.C., A.G., and E.S. conceptualized the idea for the review. J.C., A.G., E.S., and D.G. contributed to the design, research, and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel C. Craddock.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Joel C. Craddock and Emma F. Strutt are affiliated with Doctors for Nutrition, a not-for-profit registered charity that promotes healthy eating by advocating for adoption of whole food plant-based diets.

Angela Genoni receives compensation as a member of the Doctors for Nutrition Advisory Council, and provides scientific writing services on a consultancy basis.

David M. Goldman is employed by Game Changers Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

Ethics Approval

N/A

Consent to Participate

N/A

Consent for Publication

N/A

Code Availability

N/A

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craddock, J.C., Genoni, A., Strutt, E.F. et al. Limitations with the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) with Special Attention to Plant-Based Diets: a Review. Curr Nutr Rep 10, 93–98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-020-00348-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-020-00348-8

Keywords

Navigation