Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The cobalt market revisited

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mineral Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cobalt market is a market that has frequent supply shortages and crises. This paper looks at the changes in the cobalt market from the period of the 1970s to 2018 to gain insights into how the cobalt market is responding and adjusting to periods of supply shortages. Particular concern has arisen due to the potential large increase in the need for cobalt in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Is the supply of cobalt able to grow at the necessary rate to match the projected increase in the production of electric vehicles? The paper finds that some cobalt market adjustments have occurred over the time period in response to supply risk, but these adjustments have not significantly offset the cobalt market characteristics that largely drive its behavior: by-product supply, the large amount of low-cost material in the DR Congo, and the technical advantages of using cobalt in its applications over potential substitutes. The ramifications for post-2018 are probably more of the same behavior. The cobalt market will continue to make incremental adjustments over time as periodic short-run price spikes occur with the corresponding supply “crisis.” The move of the cobalt market to a dominant end use may make the market even more cyclical and prone to supply crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Barazi S et al (2017) Cobalt from the DR Congo-Potential, Risks and Significance for the Global Cobalt Market. (translated, original in German), BGR, Commodity Top News v. 53, Hannover

  • Alonso E, Gregory J, Field F, Kirchain R (2007) Material availability and supply chain: risks, effects, and responses. Environ Sci Technol 41(19):6649–6656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (1983) The marketing of cobalt. Nat Res Forum 7(1):81–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (1985) In: Vogely WA (ed) Theory of Metal Demand. Economics of the Mineral Industries, 4th edn. AIME, New York, pp 161–179

    Google Scholar 

  • China Ministry of Land and Resources (2016) China mineral resources (2016–2020). Geological Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry C (2017) Lithium-ion battery costs & market. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. July 5, 2017, New York

  • European Commission (2017) Study on the review of the list of critical raw materials, critical raw materials factsheets, Brussels

  • German Trade & Invest (2015) Electromobility in Germany: Vision 2020 and Beyond. Issue 2015/2016, February 2015

  • Helbig C, Bradshaw AM, Wietschel L, Thorenz A, Tuma A (2018) Supply risks associated with lithium-ion batteries. J Clean Prod 172:274–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Council of Clean Transportation (2018) China’s new energy vehicle mandate policy. Policy Update, January 2018

  • Kapusta JPT (2006) Cobalt Production & Markets: a brief overview. JOM 58(10):33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King A (2018) Battery builders get the cobalt blues. Chemistry World. March 12, 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry, UK

  • Miller KA, Thompson KF, Johnson P, Santillo D (2018) An overview of seabed mining including the current state of development, environmental impacts, and knowledge gaps. Frontiers in Marine Science 4 (January), Article 418, pp. 1–24

  • Mudd GM, Weng Z, Jowitt SM, Turnbull ID, Graedel TE (2013) Quantifying the recoverable resources of by-product metals: the case of cobalt. Ore Geol Rev 55:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivetti EA, Ceder G, Gaustad GG, Fu X (2017) Lithium-ion battery supply chain considerations: analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals. Joule 1:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt T, Buchert M, Schebek L (2016) Investigation of the primary production routes of nickel and cobalt products used for Li-ion batteries. Resour Conserv Recycl 112:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shedd KB (2018) Cobalt. U.S. Geological Survey, Minerals Commodity Summaries, Reston, Virginia

  • Shedd KB, McCullough EA, Bleiwas DI (2017) Global trends affecting the supply security of cobalt. Mining Eng (December), pp. 37–42

  • Slack JF, Kimball BE, Shedd KB (2017) Cobalt. Chapter F. Critical mineral resources of the United States-Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply, Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, Jr., J.H., Seal II, R.R., & Bradley, D.C. (eds), U.S. Geological Survey

  • Statista (2018) Distribution of cobalt demand worldwide as of 2016, by industry, www.statista.com/statistics/655947/global-cobalt-demand-distribution-by-industry/. Accessed 4 Oct 2018

  • Tilton JE (1977) The future of nonfuel minerals, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

  • Tilton JE, Guzman JI (2016) Mineral economics and policy. RFF Press, New York, NY

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2010) Critical materials summary, Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2011) Critical materials strategy, Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2013) Metal prices in the United States through 2010. Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5188

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2017) Cobalt statistics, Reston, Virginia

  • Van Nijen K, Van Passel S, Squires D (2018) A stochastic techno-economic assessment of seabed mining of polymetallic nodules in the Clarion Clipperton Fracture Zone. Mar Policy 95:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Li J (2015) On the sustainability of cobalt utilization in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:12–18

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary A. Campbell.

Additional information

I was pleased to be invited to submit a paper for this special issue in honor of Dr. John Tilton who has been an important role model and mentor for me over many years. I first met John as a transfer Ph.D. student in what was then the Mineral Economics program at the Pennsylvania State University. I had the chance to take his very influential course in the Economics of the Metal Industries that had been one of the primary reasons for me to transfer to the Penn State. As a mid-year transfer, I had not come in on any existing project so I was in need of a dissertation topic and advisor. One day, John came up to me holding a journal article. He said this is an interesting paper. I do not understand it (some of the technical methods). Do your dissertation on it. Then, he walked off. If I had known John better at the time, I would have understood it was probably meant as a humorous suggestion. As a new graduate student, I took it very seriously and had gained a thesis topic and advisor. The journal article argued that copper model demand results of the day were biased because of rationing that occurred due to producer pricing (leading to market disequilibrium). I was of course going to look at the copper market, but another metal market was needed for comparison (and originality) purposes. The cobalt market at the time had a similar use of a producer price and rationing, so it was chosen. Cobalt was a market in “crisis” in the 1970s era that I was writing about in my dissertation because of supply problems. Cobalt is back in the news in 2018 with a potential for another supply crisis. This special issue seemed like a good time to revisit the cobalt market and explore the reasons why the cobalt market is still having supply crises after 40 years. John taught us that markets should adjust and correct over time.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campbell, G.A. The cobalt market revisited. Miner Econ 33, 21–28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-019-00173-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-019-00173-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation