Abstract
Introduction
Diabetes has been linked with poorer outcomes in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. However, the question to whether continue or withdraw metformin therapy in COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus remains contentious. This study aims to investigate the association between metformin and poor COVID-19 outcomes.
Methods
Eligible studies published up to 21 October 2020 were included and appraised for validity, importance, and applicability. The included studies were further ranked according to the level of evidence (LOE).
Results
Nine studies were included for further assessments, of which seven studies stated that metformin was not associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes (LOE II-V), while the other two with poorer designs stated otherwise (LOE V). Although metformin may increase the risk of developing acidosis and lactic acidosis (LOE IV), the observed risks were more accentuated in patients with severe COVID-19 disease or kidney impairment and in patients with > 2 daily metformin doses. Interestingly, one study revealed that metformin may even yield therapeutic role in reducing the risk of COVID-19 mortality (LOE II), although further studies are required to confirm these findings.
Conclusions
Our findings indicated that metformin may be safely continued in COVID-19 patients. The benefit of metformin therapy with simultaneous continuous monitoring of COVID-19 severity and kidney function may outweigh the risks of lactic acidosis, of which incidence is relatively rare.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Clinical scenario
A 45-years-old man with a 5-year history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) came to the hospital with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. His T2DM had been well-controlled by metformin 500 mg bid, and his laboratory panel revealed a HbA1C level of 43 mmol/mol and a random blood glucose level of 8.6 mmol/L, while the other tests were unremarkable.
Recent consensuses have recommended diabetic patients to temporarily cease metformin treatment during the course of COVID-19 disease [1, 2]. However, the patient expressed his concerns that he wishes to stay with the current medication. Acknowledging the patient’s wishes, the general practitioner wonders whether metformin had any effect on COVID-19 outcomes.
Introduction
The disease burden of the COVID-19 pandemic has perpetually surged with millions of cases and deaths. Diabetes has been strongly associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients. [3] However, the management strategy of diabetic COVID-19 patients remains contentious as previous reports showed conflicting results [1, 4]. This raises concerns about the safety of metformin, the gold standard first-line antidiabetic treatment [5], in treating COVID-19-infected T2DM patients. Hence, we studied the evidence linking metformin and poor COVID-19 outcomes in T2DM patients, thus providing guidance for clinicians to make real-time treatment decisions in such cases.
Clinical question
Is metformin therapy associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19-infected T2DM patients?
Methods
Search strategy and eligibility criteria
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, EBSCO MEDLINE, CINAHL, and gray literature databases (Google Scholar, ProQuest, Scopus, preprints) for studies investigating the effect of metformin on COVID-19 outcomes, including mortality, severity, and other prognostic surrogates, published up to 21 October 2020 using keywords listed on Supplementary Table S1. Records were screened against the eligibility criteria listed on Fig. 1, and no language restrictions were applied.
Critical appraisal
The included studies were further appraised for validity, importance, and applicability using a standardized tool [8]. Critical appraisal and literature searches were conducted by two pairs of independent adjudicators (GL and RAR, EW and IPS), with discordant judgments resolved by consensus between the authors. Lastly, the studies were ranked according to their level of evidence (LOE) [9].
Results
The initial search yielded 1094 records, of which 16 were retrieved following thorough reviews. Among them, two systematic reviews (SRs) were excluded as one had overlapping studies with smaller sample size [10], and another one pooled the unadjusted rather than the adjusted estimates [6]. In addition, five observational studies were also excluded as they were already included in the SR. Therefore, nine studies comprising of one SR of cohort studies, six retrospective cohort studies, one case series, and one case-control study qualified for inclusion. Details on the literature search process are illustrated by Fig. 1.
We discovered that most studies stated that metformin use was not associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes, whereas only two studies stated otherwise [11, 12]. However, both studies were underpowered to determine causalities due to poorer designs. Furthermore, one study [11] did not adjust for important confounders, and another one [12] yielded excessively wide confidence intervals (CIs), thus further diminishing the LOE (LOE V; Table 1). Among the included studies, four were deemed not clinically important as the results were not adjusted for confounders, while another one was judged inapplicable as they only included COVID-19 patients with multiple myeloma.
Interestingly, Kow et al. discovered that metformin use was associated with a lower rate of COVID-19 mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.43–0.89, LOE II; Table 2) [7]. Although some study-specific estimates were inconsistent, the model only yielded non-significant low heterogeneity (I2 = 29%, p = 0.23) [7], hence resulting in the judgment of LOE II. This was further corroborated by Pérez-Belmonte et al. who stated that either metformin monotherapy or its combination with dipeptyl peptidase-4 inhibitor remained safe for diabetic COVID-19 patients (LOE III) [13]—further ascertaining the findings. On the other hand, Cheng et al. stated that metformin was associated with increased risk of acidosis and lactic acidosis (LOE IV), although the effect was more accentuated in patients with severe COVID-19 infection (oxygen saturation < 93% or neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.13) or kidney impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and in patients taking > 2 daily metformin doses [14] (Table 1).
Discussion
The question to whether continue or adjourn metformin therapy in COVID-19 patients remained relevant during the pandemic. Recent consensus has recommended postponing metformin therapy due to the risk of dehydration and lactic acidosis [1, 2]; however, some others argued that the impending benefits of metformin may outweigh the risks of developing adverse events as their incidence is relatively rare [15, 16]. According to our findings, it is plausible to continue metformin therapy while simultaneously increasing vigilance on the patient’s COVID-19 severity and kidney function. Furthermore, our patient was not at higher risks of developing acidosis as his COVID-19 disease was not severe and his renal panel was unremarkable. In addition, his daily metformin doses were still within the safe limit [14], thus further inclining towards the use of metformin. Furthermore, it is also important to heed to patients’ preference as it may substantially affect treatment adherence and outcome. [17] This is saliently important considering that poorer glycemic control has been associated with poor COVID-19 prognosis [18], implying that the benefits of continuing metformin may also outweigh the risk of noncompliance. Despite the favorable findings, further prospective studies are required to establish a firm evidence as the included studies yielded predominantly low-to-moderate LOE.
Further extrapolating our findings, recent reports have suggested the potential therapeutic role of metformin in COVID-19 [7, 10]. Several mechanisms have been hypothesized, including its ability to induce phosphorylation of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptors to inhibit viral entry and replication [10]. Furthermore, metformin yields potent antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and pulmoprotective properties, thus further suggesting the impending benefits [10]. Nonetheless, further studies are required to substantiate these premises.
Conclusion
In summary, our findings indicated that metformin may be safely continued in diabetic COVID-19 patients. However, several factors need to be considered when assessing the benefits and risks of continuing metformin therapy, including COVID-19 severity, kidney function, and glycemic control. Rather than indifferently deferring metformin therapy, it is more imperative to continuously monitor the patient’s COVID-19 disease course and renal function, deterioration of which may predict poor COVID-19 outcomes.
Data availability
The data that supports the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
Bornstein SR, Rubino F, Khunti K, Mingrone G, Hopkins D, Birkenfeld AL, et al. Practical recommendations for the management of diabetes in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Elsevier Ltd. 2020;8:546–50.
Hartmann-Boyce J, Morris E, Goyder C, Kinton J, Perring J, Nunan D, et al. Diabetes and COVID-19: risks, management, and learnings from other national disasters. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:1695–703.
World Health Organization. Clinical management of COVID-19 - interim guidance 27 May 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
Hussain A, Bhowmik B, do Vale Moreira NC. COVID-19 and diabetes: Knowledge in progress. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2020;108142.
Gnesin F, Thuesen ACB, Kähler LKA, Madsbad S, Hemmingsen B. Metformin monotherapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2020;2020.
Hariyanto TI, Kurniawan A. Metformin use is associated with reduced mortality rate from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Obes Med. 2020;19:100290.
Kow CS, Hasan SS. Mortality risk with preadmission metformin use in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020:1–3.
Critical appraisal of prognostic studies. Oxford: Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/critical-appraisal-tools
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford levels of evidence 2. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence
Scheen AJ. Metformin and COVID-19: From cellular mechanisms to reduced mortality. Diabetes Metab. 2020/08/05. 2020.
Dashti HT, Bates DW, Roche EC, Fiskio JM, Mora S, Demler OV, et al. Clinical characteristics and severity of COVID-19 disease in patients from Boston area hospitals. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.27.20163071.
Gao Y, Liu T, Zhong W, Liu R, Zhou H, Huang W, et al. Risk of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes with COVID-19: a preliminary retrospective report. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(6):1055–9.
Pérez-Belmonte LM, Torres-Peña JD, López-Carmona MD, Ayala-Gutiérrez M, Fuentes-Jiménez F, Huerta LJ, et al. Impact of glucose-lowering drugs on mortality and other adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for COVID-19. SSRN Electron J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3666251.
Cheng X, Liu YM, Li H, Zhang X, Lei F, Qin JJ, et al. Metformin is associated with higher incidence of acidosis, but not mortality, in individuals with COVID-19 and pre-existing type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. United States: Cell Press. 2020;32:537–547.e3.
Chen X, Guo H, Qiu L, Zhang C, Deng Q, Leng Q. Immunomodulatory and antiviral activity of metformin and its potential implications in treating coronavirus disease 2019 and lung injury. Front Immunol. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2020.
Malhotra A, Hepokoski M, McCowen KC, Y-J Shyy J. ACE2, Metformin, and COVID-19. iScience. Elsevier Inc. 2020;101425:23.
Brown MT, Bussell JK. Medication adherence: WHO cares? Mayo Clin. Proc. Elsevier Ltd. 2011;304–14.
Lazarus G, Audrey J, Wangsaputra VK, Tamara A, Tahapary DL. High admission blood glucose independently predicts poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;171:108561.
Goodall JW, Reed TAN, Ardissino M, Bassett P, Whittington AM, Cohen DL, et al. Risk factors for severe disease in patients admitted with COVID-19 to a hospital in London, England: A retrospective cohort study. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.24.20200337.
Izzi-Engbeaya C, Distaso W, Yang W, Idowu O, Kenkre JS, Shah RJ, et al. Severe COVID-19 and diabetes: A retrospective cohort study from three London teaching hospitals. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.20160275.
Mirsoleymani S, Nekooghadam SM. Risk factors for severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Iranian patients: Who was more vulnerable? SSRN Electron J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3566216.
Wang B, Van Oekelen O, Mouhieddine TH, Del Valle DM, Richter J, Cho HJ, et al. A tertiary center experience of multiple myeloma patients with COVID-19: Lessons learned and the path forward. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:94.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to idea conception, data abstraction, and manuscript draft. GL developed the methodology and visualized the data. GL and JDB reviewed and edited the initial manuscript draft. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 16.8 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazarus, G., Suhardi, I.P., Wiyarta, E. et al. Is there a need to reconsider the use of metformin in COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 41, 377–382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-021-00924-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-021-00924-w