Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the classroom practices that may enable a compassionate approach to financial literacy education

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From an early age, children are faced with financial dilemmas and are expected to make effective financial decisions about money. In this paper, we explore the classroom practices that may enable a compassionate approach to financial literacy education. We observed an inquiry-based mathematics lesson in a Year 4 primary school classroom. The financial maths task asked students to decide on the best fundraising option for the school. We used the theory of practice architectures to analyse the interactions in the classroom in order to understand what may have enabled and constrained classroom practices. We found that classroom practices such as engaging with peers through positive and collaborative learning opportunities, making ethical, social and mathematical connections of the task, and considering the impact of financial decisions on others may enable a compassionate approach to financial literacy education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Index of Community and Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA) was developed to make meaningful comparisons with other schools on National Assessment Program—literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN) achievement tests. A student’s family backgrounds and geographical location, and the number of Indigenous students in the school, are all factors in this index.

  2. We are using the word ‘mistake’ in the mindset (Dweck 2006) and mathematical mindset (Boaler 2016) context of sharing mistakes.

References

  • Appleyard, L., & Rowlingson, K. (2013). Children and financial education: challenges for developing financial capability in the classroom. Social Policy & Society, 12(4), 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, C. (2011). Financial literacy in Ontario: neoliberalism, Pierre Bourdieu and the citizen. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(1), 188–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, C. (2014). Financial literacy education as public pedagogy for the capitalist debt economy. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 30(31), 47–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atweh, B., Bose, A., Graven, M., Subramanian, J., & Venkat, H. (2014). Teaching numeracy in pre-school and early grades in low-income countries. GmbH: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Retrieved from: http://www.giz.de/expertise/downloads/giz2014-en-studie-teaching-numeracy-preschool-early-grades-numeracy.pdf.

  • Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC). (2012). MoneySmart teaching links to Australian curriculum. Retrieved from: http://teaching.moneysmart.gov.au/professional-learning/teaching-consumer-and-financial-literacy/section-3/links-to-australian-curriculum.

  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). (2011a). National consumer and financial literacy framework. Retrieved from: http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Consumer_Financial_Literacy_Framework_FINAL.pdf.

  • Australian Securities, & Investments Commission (ASIC). (2011b). National financial literacy strategy. (report 229). Sydney: Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J., Karlan, D., & Pradhan, M. (2015). The impact of financial education for youth in Ghana. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 21068. Retrieved from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w21068.

  • Blue, L.E. (2016a). Exploring financial literacy education practices in a Canadian Aboriginal community: a case study. PhD dissertation. Griffith University.

  • Blue, L. E. (2016b). Financial literacy education with aboriginal people: the importance of contextual and cultural understanding. Journal of Financial Planning and Research, 2, 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blue, L. E., & Pinto, L. E. (2017). Other ways of being: challenging dominant financial literacy discourses in aboriginal context. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(1), 55–70. doi:10.1007/s13384-017-0226-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blue, L. E., Grootenboer, P. J., & Brimble, M. A. (2014). Financial literacy education curriculum: missing the mark or making the grade. International Journal of Economic Education, 16, 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2014.07.005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blue, L. E., Grootenboer, P., & Brimble, M. A. (2015). The importance of praxis in financial literacy education: an Indigenous perspective. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 117–124). Sunshine Coast, QLD: MERGA.

  • Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  • Boylan, M. (2016). Ethical dimensions of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 395–409. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9678-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Deakin University Press.

  • Cheeseman, J., & Mornane, A. (2014). Primary students’ perceptions of their mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 135–142). Sunshine Coast, QLD: MERGA.

  • Australian Curriculum. (2016). Curriculum filter. F-10 curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Browse?a=E&a=M&a=S&a=hass&a=da&a=dr&a=ma&a=mu&a=va&a=DE&a=DI&a=HPE&y=5&y=6&layout=2&browseLayout=2#page=2&yl-6.

  • Australian Curriculum. (2017). General capabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/overview/introduction.

  • Dweck, C. (2006). Mindsets: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2010). Mind-sets. Principal Leadership, 10(5), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2014). Inquiry pedagogy to promote emerging proportional reasoning in primary students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenstein, M. (1990). Incorporating race, gender, and class issues into a critical mathematics literacy curriculum. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 12, 161–170. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9105-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2014). Students’ perspectives on their numeracy development across the learning areas. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 473–492). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015a). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 611–624. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0648-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015b). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: a survey of the state of the field. ZMD Mathematics Education, 47, 531–548. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootenboer, P. (2013). Praxis and mathematics education. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21(2), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grootenboer, P., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2013). Mathematics education as a practice: a theoretical position. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia, Melbourne (pp. 370–377). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootenboer, P., & Marshman, M. (2016). Mathematics, affect and learning: middle school students’ beliefs and attitudes about mathematics education. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgert, M. A., Hogarth, J. M., & Beverly, S. G. (2003). Household financial management: the connection between knowledge and behavior. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 89, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, B. (2001). Picking up pebbles on the beach (p. 10). New Zealand Education Review.

  • Hung, A. A., Parker, A. M., & Yoong, J. K. (2009). Defining and measuring financial literacy. Working paper 708, RAND Labor and Population.

  • Hunter, R., Hunter, J., Jorgensen, R., & Choy, B. H. (2016). Innovative and powerful pedagogical practices in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 213–234). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, S. J. (2010). Measuring financial literacy. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 296–316. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01170.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R., & Sullivan, P. (2010). Scholastic heritage and success in school mathematics: implications for remote aboriginal learners. In I. Snyder & J. Nieuwenhuysen (Eds.), Closing the gap in education? Improving outcomes in southern world societies (pp. 23–36). Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. Amsterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Enabling praxis: challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Bristol, L., & Grootenboer, P. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, K., & Jorgensen, R. (2015). I hate maths: why do we need to do maths? Using iPad video diaries to investigate attitudes and emotions towards mathematics in year three and year six students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 925–944. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9621x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucey, T. (2007). The art of relating moral education to financial education: an equity imperative. Social Studies Research and Practice, 2(3), 486–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucey, T. A., Agnello, M. F., & Laney, J. D. (2015). A critically compassionate approach to financial literacy. Rottrdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lusardi, A. (2015). Financial literacy skills for the 21st century: evidence from PISA. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49, 639–659. doi:10–1111/joca.12099.

  • Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: a study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K. (2012). The pedagogy of mathematical inquiry. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: new developments in the learning sciences (pp. 371–397). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, L., & Klein, L. S. (2009). The impact of financial literacy education on subsequent financial behavior. Journal of Financial Counselling and Planning, 20(1), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, M. H. (2009). The effectiveness of youth financial education: a review of the literature. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 20(1), 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, K. (2009). Mathematics in and through social justice: another misunderstood marriage? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 205–216. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9111-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. (2017). Positive behaviour management: building positive learning identities and engagement in learning. In D. Pendergast, N. Bahr, & K. Main (Eds.), Teaching middle years: rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 243–264). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., & Blue, L. E. (2017). Towards a positive pedagogy: designing pedagogical practices that facilitate positivity within the classroom. Educational Action Research, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1339620.

  • O’Brien, M., Makar, K., & Fielding-Wells, J. (2015). How inquiry pedagogy enables teachers to facilitate growth mindsets in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 469–476). Sunshine Coast, QLD: MERGA.

  • O’Brien, M., Blue, L. E., & Rowlands, D. (2017). My best possible learning self: primary school children’s perspectives on happiness and success in the classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 12(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). PISA 2012 financial literacy assessment framework. PISA: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development International Network on Financial Education (OECD INFE). (2012). OECD/INFE high-level principles on national strategies for financial education. OECD Publishing.

  • Peng, T., Bartholomae, S., Fox, J., & Cravener, G. (2007). The impact of personal finance education delivered in high school and college courses. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(2), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, L. E., & Coulson, E. (2011). Social justice and the gender politics of financial literacy education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 9(2), 54–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, L. J. (2014). The mindset of growth and success [Web log post]. Retrieved from: https://visionhelp.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/the-mindset-of-growth-and-success.

  • Reitman, W. (1965). Cognition and thought: an information-processing approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawatzki, C. (2014a). Connecting social and mathematical thinking: the use of “real life” contexts. Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Brisbane, Vol. 1 (pp. 557–564). Sydney: MERGA.

  • Sawatzki, C. (2014b). Connecting social and mathematical thinking: using financial dilemmas to explore children’s financial problem-solving and decision-making. PhD dissertation. Monash University.

  • Sawatzki, C. (2017). Lessons in financial literacy task design: authentic, imaginable, useful. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(1), 25–43. doi:10.1007/s13394-016-0184-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: a philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: on performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a critical mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: the case for quantitative literacy (pp. 1–22). Princeton: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swars, S. L., Daane, C. L., & Giesen, J. (2007). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: what is the relationship in preservice elementary teachers? School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vale, C., Atweh, B., Averill, R., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2016). Equity, social justice and ethics in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia (pp. 2012–2015). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L. E. (2008). Against financial-literacy education. Iowa Law Review, 94(1), 197–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L. E. (2011). The financial education fallacy. American Economic Review, 101(3), 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, A. C. (2013). Financial literacy and financial literacy programmes in Australia. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 18(3), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council (DP140101511). We thank Rebecca for her expertise and insights in teaching this class.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levon Ellen Blue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blue, L.E., O’Brien, M. & Makar, K. Exploring the classroom practices that may enable a compassionate approach to financial literacy education. Math Ed Res J 30, 143–164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0223-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0223-5

Keywords

Navigation