Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What is rate? Does context or representation matter?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rate is an important, but difficult, mathematical concept. Despite more than 20 years of research, especially with calculus students, difficulties are reported with this concept. This paper reports the results from analysis of data from 20 Australian Grade 10 students. Interviews targeted students’ conceptions of rate, focussing on the influence of representation and context on their expression of their understanding of rate. This analysis shows that different representations of functions provide varying levels of rate-related information for individual students. Understandings of rate in one representation or context are not necessarily transferred to another representation or context. Rate is an important, but commonly misunderstood, mathematical concept with many everyday applications (Swedosh, Dowsey, Caruso, Flynn, & Tynan, 2007). It is a complicated concept comprising many interwoven ideas such as the ratio of two numeric, measurable quantities but in a context where both quantities are changing. In mathematics classes, this is commonly expressed as change in the dependent variable resulting from a unit change in the independent variable, and variously described as constant or variable rate; average or instantaneous rate. In addition, rate may be seen as a purely abstract mathematical notion or embedded in the understanding of real-world applications. This paper explores the research question: Are students’ expressions of their conceptions of rate affected by either context or mathematical representation? This question was part of a larger study (Herbert, 2010) conducted with Grade 10 students from the Australian state of Victoria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adu-gyamfi, K. (2007). Connections among representations: the nature of students’ coordinations on a linear function task. Unpublished PhD, North Carolina State University. Accessed 30 January, 2010 from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/

  • Amit, M., & Fried, M. (2005). Multiple representations in 8th grade algebra lessons: Are learners really getting it? In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 57–63). Melbourne: PME.

  • Bowers, J., Nickerson, S., & Kenehen, G. (2002). Using technology to teach concepts of speed. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions. 2002 Yearbook (pp. 176–187). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, I., Howes, B., Kimber, K., Nolan, C., & Noonan, K. (2004). Maths for Vic 9. Melbourne, Australia: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: a framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, E. (2007). Modeling teachers’ ways of thinking about rate of change. Unpublished PhD thesis, Arizona: State University. Accessed 29 January, 2010 from http://pat-thompson.net/PDFversions/Theses/2007Ted.pdf

  • delos Santos, A., & Thomas, M. (2005). The growth of schematic thinking about derivative. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: research, theory and practice: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Group of Australasia (pp. 377–384). Melbourne: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 176–201). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, S., & Doig, B. (2003). Shortest equals fastest: upper primary children’s pre-conceptions of speed. In J. Novotna (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching (pp. 79–82). Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, S. (2010). An investigation of middle secondary students’ mathematical conceptions of rate. Unpublished PhD, Ballarat: University of Ballarat.

  • Herbert, S., & Pierce, R. (2009). Revealing conceptions of rate of change. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 217–224). Palmerston North: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. R. Fennema (Ed.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J., & Schorr, R. (2002). Changing representational infrastructures changes most everything: The case of SimCalc, algebra & calculus. In K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on the impact of technology on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 47–75). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key Curriculum Press (2006). Geometres’ SketchPad.

  • Lamon, S. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobato, J., & Thanheiser, E. (1999). Re-thinking slope from quantitative and phenomenological perspectives. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Israel.

  • Mathematics Education Researchers Group (2004). SimCalc Projects. Accessed August 22, 2005, from http://www.simcalc.umassd.edu/

  • Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pape, S., & Tschoshanov, M. (2001). The role of representation (s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, R. Y. (2003). Motion, speed, and other ideas that “should be put in books”. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, T., Jänen, I., & Brünken, R. (2007). The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1055–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedosh, P., Dowsey, J., Caruso, N., Flynn, P., & Tynan, D. (2007). Mathsworld: CAS active mathematical methods units 1 & 2. Melbourne: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubuz, B. (2007). Interpreting a graph and constructing its derivative graph: stability and change in students’ conceptions. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 609–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Curriculum & Assessment Authority (VCAA) (2007). Victorian essential learning standards. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/essential/

Download references

Acknowledgement

An earlier version of this paper appeared in the conference proceedings of MERGA 2010: MERGA33 Fremantle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University, PO Box 423, Warrnambool, Victoria, 3280, Australia

    Sandra Herbert

  2. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, 234 Queensberry Street, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Robyn Pierce

Authors
  1. Sandra Herbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robyn Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Herbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herbert, S., Pierce, R. What is rate? Does context or representation matter?. Math Ed Res J 23, 455–477 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0026-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0026-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation