Abstract
Contemporary education is being undeniably shaped by datafication, and while new algorithmic and automated decision-making processes can have educational benefits, they also raise issues about children’s digital rights and education policy responses to these rights. This study mapped how children’s digital right to privacy and related human rights concepts are present in education policy documents of Australia’s three largest state government departments of education. A children’s rights coding framework was developed from the United Nation’s ‘General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment’ and used to code the dataset. Two levels of analysis were then undertaken. Level 1 involved code and subcode frequency analyses of concepts related to children’s digital rights in policy documents. Level 2 was a descriptive qualitative analysis designed to understand how digital rights were expressed in policy. The study found that although all state government departments of education reflected some elements of children’s digital rights, some states had a more complex, sustained and public-facing commitment to expressing these in policy. The study concluded that Australian government departments of education should work towards providing more transparent public-facing policy on children’s digital rights that can empower students and their families to make informed decisions within a rapidly shifting digital environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3–9.
Akter, S., McCarthy, G., Sajib, S., Michael, K., Dwivedi, Y. K., D’Ambra, J., & Shen, K. N. (2021). Algorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102387
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2023, February 15). Schools. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/education/schools/latest-release
Australian Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). About children’s rights. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/childrens-rights/about-childrens-rights
Ben-Porath, S., & Harel Ben Shahar, T. (2017). Introduction: Big data and education: Ethical and moral challenges. Theory and Research in Education, 15(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878517737201
Campolo, A., Sanfilippo, M., & Crawford, K. (2017). AI now 2017 report. AI Now Institute. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://ainowinstitute.org/publication/ai-now-2017-report-2
Cardno, C. (2018). Policy document analysis: A practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 24(4), 623–640.
Chen, M., Ebert, D., Hagen, H., Laramee, R. S., Liere, R., Ma, K. L., Ribarsky, W., Scheuermann, G., & Silver, D. (2009). Data, information, and knowledge in visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 29(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2009.6
European Commission (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d81a0d54-5348-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Faggella, D. (2020, February 26). What is machine learning?. Retrieved from https://emerj.com/ai-glossary-terms/what-is-machine-learning/
Gulson, K., & Sellar, S. (2019). Emerging data infrastructures and the new topologies of education policy. Environment and Planning d: Society and Space, 37(2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818813144
Hill, R. K. (2016). What an algorithm is. Philosophy & Technology, 29, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0184-5
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2019). Ethically aligned design. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/ead-v1/
Kordzadeh, N., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022). Algorithmic bias: Review, synthesis, and future research directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212
Lehrer, R., Giles, N., & Schauble, L. (2002). Data modeling. In R. Lehrer & L. Schauble (Eds.), Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children’s understanding of mathematics and science (pp. 1–26). Teachers College Press.
Lenovo. (n.d.). What is data in computing? Retrieved November 10, 2023, from https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/glossary/data/?
Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318
Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328
Martin, K. (2019). Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019, May 22). Recommendation of the council on artificial intelligence. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
Potasznik, A. (2023, May 18–20). ABCs: Differentiating algorithmic bias, automation bias, and automation complacency. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS) (pp. 1–5). IEEE
Prasad, D. (2008). Content analysis: A method of social science research. In D. K. L. Das (Ed.), Research Methods for Social Work (pp. 174–193). Rawat Publications. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1748.1448
Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., & Cumbo, B. (2021). Attending to data: Exploring the use of attendance data within the datafied school. Research in Education, 109(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523720984200
Southgate, E., Blackmore, K., Pieschl, S., Grimes, S., McGuire, J., & Smithers, K. (2019, August 13). Artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in schools: Research report. Department of Education and Training, Australia. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://apo.org.au/node/254301
Third, A. & Moody, L. (2021, March 3). Our rights in the digital world: A report on the children’s consultations to inform UNCRC General Comment 25. 5Rights Foundation and Western Sydney University. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://5rightsfoundation.com/uploads/OurRIghtsinaDigitalWorld-FullReport.pdf
United Nations. (1989, November 20). Convention on the rights of the child. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2021). General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2021-childrens-rights-relation
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Vidovich, L. (2001, December 2-6). A conceptual framework for analysis of education policy and practices [Paper presentation]. 2001 AARE Annual Conference, Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, WA, Australia, https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2001/vid01267.pdf
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2021). Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567
Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.103578
Williamson, B. (2020). Bringing up the bio-datafied child: Scientific and ethical controversies over computational biology in education. Ethics and Education, 15(4), 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1822631
Williamson, B., Macgilchrist, F., & Potter, J. (2023). Re-examining AI, automation and datafication in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2167830
Wyatt-Smith, C., Lingard, B., & Heck, E. (2019, October 25). Digital learning assessments and big data: implications for teacher professionalism. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370940
Funding
No funding was acquired for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
There are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Groth, S., Southgate, E. A policy document analysis of student digital rights in the Australian schooling context. Aust. Educ. Res. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00683-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00683-z