Abstract
Teacher assessment literacy is a phrase that is often used but rarely defined. Yet understanding teacher assessment literacy is important in an international curriculum and assessment reform context that continues to challenge teachers’ assessment practices. In this article situated examples of classroom assessment literacies are analysed using Bernstein’s (Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique, Taylor and Francis, London, 1996; Br J Sociol Educ 20(2):157–173, 1999) theoretical tools of vertical and horizontal discourses, classification and framing. Drawing on a sociocultural view of learning, the authors define teacher assessment literacies as dynamic social practices which are context dependent and which involve teachers in articulating and negotiating classroom and cultural knowledges with one another and with learners, in the initiation, development and practice of assessment to achieve the learning goals of students. This conceptualisation of assessment literacy aims to make explicit some underpinning theoretical constructs of assessment literacy to inform dialogue and decision making for policy and practice to benefit student learning and achievement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adie, L. (2010). Developing shared understandings of standards-based assessment: Online moderation practices across geographically diverse contexts. PhD thesis. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
Ainscow, M. (2009). Local solutions for local contexts: The development of more inclusive education systems. In (Ed.), Den inkluderende skole I et ledelsesperspektiv (Leadership perspectives on the inclusive school) Copenhagen: Rasmus Alenkaer, Frydenlund.
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.
Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010a). The Shape of the Australian Curriculum. http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/curriculum.html-3 Accessed 21 Feb 2012.
Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010b.) My School™. http://www.myschool.edu.au/SchoolSearch.aspx Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2011). The Australian Curriculum version 1.2. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Home Accessed 19 Nov 2011.
Berlack, H. (2001). Race and the achievement gap. Rethinking Schools Online 15, no. 4. http://www.rethinkingschools.org/restrict.asp?path=archive/15_04/Race154.shtml. Accessed 31 Oct 2008.
Berliner, D. (2008). Why Rising Test Scores May Not Equal Increased Student Learning. Dissent http://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/why-rising-test-scores-may-not-equal-increased-student-learning. Accessed 12 Jan 2012.
Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education (pp. 47–69). London: Collier Macmillan.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning. (pp. 81–100). London: SAGE publications.
Bourne, J. (2004). Framing talk: Towards a ‘radical visible pedagogy’. In Muller, J. Davies, B. & Morais, A (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein (pp. 61–74). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 23–35.
Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning. Implementing formative assessment in confucian-heritage settings. New York: Routledge.
Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Clarke, M., Madaus, G., Horn, C., & Ramos, M. (2000). Retrospective on educational testing and assessment in the 20th century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 159–181.
Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E., & Vygotsky, L. S. (Eds.). (1978). Mind in Society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Comber, B. (2012). Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganisation of teachers’ work: Federal policy, local effects. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 119–136.
Cowie, B. (2005). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 137–151.
Criswell, J. (2006). Developing assessment literacy: A guide for elementary and middle school teachers. Norwood: Christopher Gordon publishers.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2011). Teacher knowledge and student learning: Making the connection. Paper presented at the 2011 Vision to Reality: Queensland’s new education landscape. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/events/linda_darling_hammond.pdf Accessed 18 Dec 2011.
De Bortoli, L., & Thomson, S. (2009). The achievement of Australia’s Indigenous students in PISA 2000–2006. Melbourne: ACER Press.
DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(4), 419–438.
Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). (2007). What Works. The Work Program: Core Issues 4: Numeracy. http://www.whatworks.edu.au Accessed 30 Jan 2011.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.
Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: Possibilities, boundaries and limitations. Assessment in Education, 2, 215–232.
Elwood, J. (2008). Gender issues in testing and assessment. In P. Murphy & K. Hall (Eds.), Learning and practice: Agency and identities. London: Sage.
Elwood, J., & Lundy, L. (2010). Revisioning assessment through a children’s rights approach: Implications for policy, process and practice. Research Papers in Education, 25(3), 335–353.
Gamble, J. & Hoadley, U. (2004). Positioning the regulative order. In J. Muller, B. Davies & A. Morais (Eds.), Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein (pp. 61–74). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Gardner, J. (2009). AfL a practical guide. Belfast: Council for Curriculum Examinations and Assessment.
Gee, J. (2003). Opportunity to learn: A language-based perspective on assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(1), 27–46.
Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning. A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
Gee, J. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. Gee, E. Haertel & L. Jones Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn (pp. 76–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.
Gipps, C. (2008). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In H. Wynne (Ed.), Student assessment and testing (Vol. 1, pp. 252–291). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
González, N., Moll, L., Floyd Tenery, M.,Rivera, A., Rendón, P., Gonzales, R., & Amanti. C. (2008). Funds of Knowledge for Teaching Latino Households. In K. Hall, P. Murphy & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and Practice Culture and Identities. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Griffin, P., Woods, K., & Nguyen, C. (2005). An environmental scan of tools and strategies that measure progress in school reform. Melbourne: Department of Education and Training.
Hipwell, P., & Klenowski, V. (2011). A case for addressing the literacy demands of assessment. Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(2), 127–146.
James, M. (2006). Assessment, teaching and theories of learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 47–60). London: SAGE publications.
Johnston, P., & Costello, P. (2005). Principles for literacy assessment. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 256–267.
Klenowski, V. (2009). Australian Indigenous students: Addressing equity issues in assessment. Teaching Education, 20(1), 77–93.
Klenowski, V., & Adie, L. (2009). Moderation as judgment practice: Reconciling system level accountability and local level practice. Curriculum Perspectives, 29(1), 10–28.
Klenowski, V., Connolly, S. & Funnell, R. (in press, accepted December 2012) Examining the assessment opportunities for cultural connectedness for student learning: A sociocultural analysis. In C. Boyle (Ed.), Student Learning: Improving practice, New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2011). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 19(1), 65–79.
Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2010). Assessment for Curriculum for Excellence. http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/Images/AssessmentforCfE_tcm4-565505.pdf Accessed 30 July 2011.
Lingard, B. (2007). Pedagogies of indifference. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 245–266.
Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Accounting for educational research. Australian Educational Research, 38, 355–382.
Luke, A., Woods, A., Bahrand, M. & McFarland, M. (2004). Accountability: Inclusive Assessment, Monitoring and Reporting. Brisbane: Research Report prepared for the Queensland Indigenous Education Consultative Body.
Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.
Maton, K. (2000). Recovering pedagogic discourse: A Bernsteinian approach to the sociology of educational knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 11(1), 79–98.
Morgan, W., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2000). Im/proper accountability: Towards a theory of critical literacy and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies and Practice, 7, 123–142.
Moss, G. (2000). Informal literacies and pedagogic discourse. Linguistics and Education., 11(1), 47–64.
Murphy, P. (2008). Gender and subject cultures in practice. In P. Murphy & K. Hall (Eds.), Learning and practice: Agency and identities (pp. 161–172). London: Sage.
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London: Institute of Physics.
New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. (2007). Collateral damage: How high stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge: Harvard Educational Press.
Popham, J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.
Pryor, J., & Crossouard, P. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20.
Queensland Studies Authority. (2009). P-12 Assessment policy. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/approach/qsa_assessment_policy.pdf Accessed 20 Sept 2011.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209.
Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582.
Stiggins, R. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238–246.
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.
Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Education Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.
Tognolini, J., & Stanley, G. (2007). Standards-basedassessment: A tool and means to the development of human capital and capacity building in education. Australian Journal of Education, 51(2), 129–145.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willis, J. (2010). Assessment for learning as a participative pedagogy. Assessment Matters, 2, 65–84.
Willis, J. (2011). Affiliation, autonomy and assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(4), 399–415.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Gunn, S. (2009). Towards theorising assessment as critical inquiry. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational Assessment in the 21st Century (pp. 83–102). London: Springer.
Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (Eds.). (2011). Australia’s curriculum dilemmas. State cultures and the big issues. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Young, V.M. & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Education Policy Analysis Archive. 18(19), 1–36.
Zammit, K. (2011). Connecting multiliteracies and engagement of students from low socio-economic backgrounds: Using Bernstein’s pedagogic discourse as a bridge. Language and Education, 25(3), 203–220.
Zepke, N., Leach, L., Brandon, J., Chapman, J., Neutze, G., Rawlins, P., et al. (2005). Standards-based assessment in the senior secondary school: A research synthesis. Wellington: New Zealand Qualifications Authority.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willis, J., Adie, L. & Klenowski, V. Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. Aust. Educ. Res. 40, 241–256 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9