Skip to main content
Log in

Sand Samples’ Preparation Using Mobile Pluviator

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to have a good estimation of soil properties in the laboratory when simulation of natural soil condition is required, especially if the soil profile is subjected to static and dynamic loadings. Soil configuration is one of the most important parameters to maintain when preparing soil samples in large area. In this study, the newly designed Mobile Pluviator adopted the air pluviation method for deposition of sand samples. The apparatus is operated based on the uniformity distribution of sand particles with the terminal velocity concept where a series of shutter porosities are chosen for different sizes of sand particles. The densities of the soil samples were determined based on the correlation between the falling height and the rate of soil discharge of the shutter. Using this apparatus, a wide range of D r (relative density) ranging from 10 to 98 % can be achieved. The advantage of the Mobile Pluviator is that it can be moved to cover a wider area during the raining process and does not interfere with monitoring instrumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D r :

Relative density

V :

Terminal velocity

P :

Mass density

D 50 :

Mean size of soil particles

H :

Distance between bottom sieve and sand surface

F :

Distance between top sieve and shutter plate

G s :

Specific gravity

C u :

Uniformity coefficient

γ d max :

Maximum dry unit weight

γ d min :

Minimum dry unit weight

γ d :

Dry unit weight

emax :

Maximum void ratio

emin :

Minimum void ratio

H crit :

Critical falling height

P 1 :

1th Pattern of shutter plat

P 2 :

2th Pattern of shutter plat

P 3 :

3th Pattern of shutter plat

P 4 :

4th Pattern of shutter plat

References

  1. Khari, M.; Khairul, A.B.K.; Adnan, A.: Evaluation of kinematic bending moment of piles subjected to seismic motions. Paper presented at the 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology (IUT), Isfahan, Iran

  2. Khari M., Kassim K.A., Adnan A.: The influence of effective confining pressure on site response analyses. Asian J. Earth Sci. 4(3), 148–156 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Polito C.P., Martin II J.R. : A reconciliation of the effects of non-plastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sand reported in literature. Earthq. Spectra 19(3), 635–651 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuerbis R., Vaid Y.P.: Sand sample preparation—the slurry deposition method. Soils Found. 28(4), 107–118 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Della N., Arab A., Belkhatir M., Missoum H., Bacconnet C., Boissier D.: Effect of the structure on the behavior of chelf sand. Acta Geotechnica Slovenia 2, 5–15 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zlatovic S., Ishihara K.: Normalized behavior of very loose non-plastic soils: effects of fabric. Soils Found. 37(4), 47–56 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulilis J.P., Seed H.B., Chan C.K., Mitchll J.K., Arulanadan K.: Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103(2), 91–108 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walker B.P., Whitaker T.: An apparatus for forming beds of sands for model foundation tests. Geotechnique 17(2), 161–167 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bieganousky W.A., Marcuson W.F.: Uniform placement of sand. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 102(GT3), 229–233 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, T.A.: Centrifuge modeling of projectile penetration in granular soils. Washington State University, Pullman (1988)

  11. BSS Council (1997) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures

  12. Miura K., Kaynia A.M., Masuda K., Kitamura E., Seto Y.: Dynamic behaviour of pile foundations in homogeneous and non-homogeneous media. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23(2), 183–192 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eid W.K.: Scaling Effect in Cone Penetration Testing in Sand. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rad, N.S.; Tumay, M.T.: Effect of cementation on the cone penetration resistance of sand. Paper presented at the Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering Speciality Conference, Virigina

  15. Kildalen, S.; Stenhamar, P.: NGI Laboratory Sand Rainer. Internal report 51505-15, p. 20. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Olso (1977)

  16. Miura, S.; Toki, S.: A sample preparation method and its effect on static and cyclic deformation-strength properties of sand. Soils Found. 22(1), 61–77 (1982)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdy Khari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khari, M., Kassim, K.A. & Adnan, A. Sand Samples’ Preparation Using Mobile Pluviator. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 6825–6834 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1247-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1247-8

Keywords

Navigation