Abstract
The three-river source region plays an important role on China’s ecological security and Asia’s water supply. Historically, the region has experienced severe ecological degradation due to climate change and human activities. Reasonable simulations of the energy and water cycles are essential to predict the responses of land surface processes to future climate change. Current land surface models involve empirical functions that are associated with many parameters. These parameter uncertainties will largely affect the simulation when applied to a new domain. The Community Land Model (CLM) is a widely used land surface model, and version 5.0 is the newest version. Compared to the prior version CLM4.5, CLM5.0 has largely updated plant hydraulic and stomatal conductance schemes. How these changes affect parameter sensitivities is unknown. In our work, we tested 17 key parameters in CLM4.5 and 19 parameters in CLM5.0 at two eddy flux sites in the three-river source region: the Maqu and Maduo sites. We adopted the simplest one-at-a-time changes on each parameter and quantified their sensitivities by the parameter effect (PE). We found that the Maqu site was more sensitive to vegetation parameters, while the Maduo site was more sensitive to the initial soil water content in both CLM4.5 and CLM5.0. This is because Maduo grid cell has wetland that does not respond to vegetation parameters in CLM, which may not reflect the reality. Further model development on wetland vegetation parameterization is important. Our validation on the default simulation showed CLM5.0 did not always improve the simulations. The largest difference between CLM5.0 and CLM4.5 was that soil moisture (SM) showed a much stronger decrease in response to a higher leaf area index (LAI) in CLM5.0 than in CLM4.5, suggesting that SM is more sensitive to vegetation changes in CLM5.0.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arsenault, K. R., G. S. Nearing, S. G. Wang, et al., 2018: Parameter sensitivity of the Noah-MP land surface model with dynamic vegetation. J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 815–830, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0205.1.
Beringer, J., S. McIlwaine, A. Lynch, et al., 2002: The use of a reduced form model to assess the sensitivity of a land surface model to biotic surface parameters. Climate Dyn., 19, 455–166, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-002-0237-9.
Cai, X. T., W. J. Riley, Q. Zhu, et al., 2019: Improving representation of deforestation effects on evapotranspiration in the E3SM land model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 2412–2427, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001551.
Collatz, G. J., J. T. Ball, C. Grivet, et al., 1991: Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: A model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric. For. Meteor., 54, 107–136, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8.
Collins, D. C., and R. Avissar, 1994: An evaluation with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) of which land-surface parameters are of greatest importance in atmospheric modeling. J. Climate, 7, 681–703, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0422(1944)077<0681:AEWTFA>2.0.CO;2.
Felfelani, F., Y. Pokhrel, K. Y. Guan, et al., 2018: Utilizing SMAP soil moisture data to constrain irrigation in the Community Land Model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12892–12902, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080870.
Gao, Y. H., K. Li, F. Chen, et al., 2015: Assessing and improving Noah-MP land model simulations for the central Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 9258–9278, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023404.
Jiang, C., and L. B. Zhang, 2016: Ecosystem change assessment in the Three-river Headwater Region, China: Patterns, causes, and implications. Ecol. Eng., 13, 24–36, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.011.
Lawrence, D. M., G. C. Hurtt, A. Arneth, et al., 2016: The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Rationale and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev., 1, 2973–2998, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2973-2016.
Li, H. Y., C. B. Fu, and W. D. Guo, 2017: An integrated evaluation of land surface energy fluxes over China in seven reanalysis/modeling products. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 8543–8566, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026166.
Lu, H., T. Koike, K. Yang, et al., 2012: Improving land surface soil moisture and energy flux simulations over the Tibetan Plateau by the assimilation of the microwave remote sensing data and the GCM output into a land surface model. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observat. Geoinformat., 17, 43–54, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.09.006.
Luo, S. Q., X. W. Fang, S. H. Lyu, et al., 2017: Improving CLM4.5 simulations of land-atmosphere exchange during freeze-thaw processes on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Meteor. Res., 31, 916–930, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-6063-0.
Medlyn, B. E., R. A. Duursma, D. Eamus, et al., 2011: Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol., 17, 2134–2144, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x.
Oleson, K. W., D. M. Lawrence, G. B. Bonan, et al., 2013: Technical Description of Version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note No. NCAR/TN-503+STR, NCAR, Boulder, CO, 434 pp, doi: https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M.
Peng, F., and G. D. Sun, 2019: Identifying sensitive model parameter combinations for uncertainties in land surface process simulations over the Tibetan Plateau. Waeer, 11, 1724, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081724.
Peng, F., M. Mu, and G. D. Sun, 2020: Evaluations of uncertainty and sensitivity in soil moisture modeling on the Tibetan Plateau. Tellus A, 72, 1–16, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1704963.
Rakovec, O., M. C. Hill, M. P. Clark, et al., 2014: Distributed Evaluation of Local Sensitivity Analysis (DELSA), with application to hydrologic models. Water Resour. Res., 50, 409–426, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014063.
Razavi, S., and H. V. Gupta, 2015: What do we mean by sensitivity analysis? The need for comprehensive characterization of “global” sensitivity in earth and environmental systems models. Water Resour. Res., 51, 3070–3092, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016527.
Rosenzweig, C., J. Elliott, D. Deryng, et al., 2014: Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3268–3273, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222463110.
Shao, Q. Q., W. Cao, J. W. Fan, et al., 2017: Effects of an ecological conservation and restoration project in the Three-River Source Region, China. J. Geogr. Sci., 27, 183–204, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1371-y.
Su, Z., J. Wen, and W. Wagner, 2010: Preface “Advances in land surface hydrological processes—field observations, modeling and data assimilation”. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 365–367, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-365-2010.
Swenson, S. C., and D. M. Lawrence, 2014: Assessing a dry surface layer-based soil resistance parameterization for the Community Land Model using GRACE and FLUXNET-MTE data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 10299–10312, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022314.
Taylor, K. E., 2001: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 106, 7183–7192, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719.
Yang, K., Y.-Y. Chen, and J. Qin, 2009: Some practical notes on the land surface modeling in the Tibetan Plateau. Hydool. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 687–701, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-687-2009.
Yang, Z.-L., R. E. Dickinson, A. Henderson-Sellers, et al., 1995: Preliminary study of spin-up processes in land surface models with the first stage data of Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes Phase 1(a). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 100, 16553–16578, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01076.
Yin, F., X. Z. Deng, Q. Jin, et al., 2014: The impacts of climate change and human activities on grassland productivity in Qinghai Province, China. Front. Earth Sci., 8, 93–103, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0390-y.
Yuan, X., P. Ji, L. Y. Wang, et al., 2018: High-resolution land surface modeling of hydrological changes over the Sanjiangyuan region in the eastern Tibetan Plateau: 1. Model development and evaluation. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 10, 2806–2828, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001412.
Zhang, G., G. S. Zhou, and F. Chen, 2017: Analysis of parameter sensitivity on surface heat exchange in the Noah land surface model at a temperate desert steppe site in China. J. Meteor. Res., 31, 1167–1182, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-7050-1.
Zhou, H. K., X. Q. Zhao, Y. H. Tang, et al., 2005: Alpine grassland degradation and its control in the source region of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers, China. Grassl. Sci., 51, 191–203, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2005.00028.x.
Acknowledgments
We greatly acknowledge the eddy flux observations (Maqu and Maduo sites) from the Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem Observation Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (http://tpwrr.nieer.cas.cn).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20050102) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41975135 and 41975130).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, Q., Wen, J., Hu, Z. et al. Parameter Sensitivities of the Community Land Model at Two Alpine Sites in the Three-River Source Region. J Meteorol Res 34, 851–864 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9205-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9205-8