Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intrauterine infusion of platelet-rich plasma for severe Asherman syndrome: a cutting-edge approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asherman syndrome (AS) consists of intrauterine adhesions development as a consequence of trauma, radiation, or infection in the endometrium. Clinical symptoms include menstrual alterations, infertility, and pregnancy complications, such as recurrent pregnancy loss or abnormal placentation. In this article, we performed a narrative review of the literature, searching electronic databases (i.e., Medline, Pubmed, and Google Scholar) to summarize the available pieces of evidence about epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of AS. Hysteroscopy is essential for diagnosis and treatment, although adhesions may recur. Different postoperative therapies have been proposed to prevent recurrence and restore impaired endometrial function and promote endometrial regeneration, although these effects are usually temporary. We report a case of AS with adhesion recurrence and endometrial atrophy who was successfully treated with intrauterine autologous platelet–rich plasma (PRP) infusion. This therapy allowed endometrial tissue regeneration, leading to increased vascularity and endometrium thickness, and restoration of endometrial function that led to a successful pregnancy. Though there is limited experience supporting the use of PRP to improve endometrial function, it has been safely used in other fields of medicine; besides, it is easy to obtain, not expensive, and harmless being an autologous source. Future studies are encouraged to further assess this approach to treat AS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fritsch H (1894) Ein Fall von volligen schwund der Gebaumutterhohle nach Auskratzung. Zentralbl Gynaekol 18:1337–1342

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asherman JG (1950) Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 57(6):892–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1950.tb06053.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freytag D, Mettler L, Maass N, Gunther V, Alkatout I (2020) Uterine anomalies and endometriosis. Minerva Med 111(1):33–49. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06341-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alkatout I, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Keckstein J, Mettler L (2018) Endometriosis: a concise practical guide to current diagnosis and treatment. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 19(3):173–175. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2018.0026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC (2008) Asherman syndrome–one century later. Fertil Steril 89(4):759–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. March CM, Israel R, March AD (1978) Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130(6):653–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(78)90322-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Inany H (2001) Intrauterine adhesions. An update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(11):986–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ (1982) Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril 37(5):593–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46268-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksen J, Kaestel C (1960) The incidence of uterine atresia after post-partum curettage. A follow-up examination of 141 patients. Dan Med Bull 7:50–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dmowski WP, Greenblatt RB (1969) Asherman’s syndrome and risk of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 34(2):288–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Taskin O, Sadik S, Onoglu A, Gokdeniz R, Erturan E, Burak F, Wheeler JM (2000) Role of endometrial suppression on the frequency of intrauterine adhesions after resectoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 7(3):351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60478-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Netter AP, Musset R, Lambert A, Salomon Y (1956) Traumatic uterine synechiae: a common cause of menstrual insufficiency, sterility, and abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 71(2):368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)37600-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krolikowski A, Janowski K, Larsen JV (1995) Asherman syndrome caused by schistosomiasis. Obstet Gynecol 85(5 Pt 2):898–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00371-j

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaffer W (1986) Role of uterine adhesions in the cause of multiple pregnancy losses. Clin Obstet Gynecol 29(4):912–924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Puente E, Alonso L, Laganà AS, Ghezzi F, Casarin J, Carugno J (2020) Chronic endometritis: old problem, novel insights and future challenges. Int J Fertil Steril 13(4):250–256. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2020.5779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein SM, Garcia CR (1973) Asherman’s syndrome: a critique and current review. Fertil Steril 24(9):722–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)39918-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Chang Y, Yao S (2013) Role of angiogenesis in endometrial repair of patients with severe intrauterine adhesion. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 6(7):1343–1350

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tao Z, Duan H (2012) Expression of adhesion-related cytokines in the uterine fluid after transcervical resection of adhesion. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 47(10):734–737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu D, Ha C, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Liu P (2013) Molecular implication of ADAM-15 and -17 in intrauterine adhesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170(1):264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gargett CE, Schwab KE, Deane JA (2016) Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years. Hum Reprod Update 22(2):137–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gargett CE, Ye L (2012) Endometrial reconstruction from stem cells. Fertil Steril 98(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wamsteker K (1997) Intrauterine adhesions (synechiae). In: Brosens I, Wamsteker K (eds) Diagnostic imaging and endoscopy in gynecology: a practical guide. WB Saunders, London, pp 171–184

    Google Scholar 

  23. Confino E, Friberg J, Giglia RV, Gleicher N (1985) Sonographic imaging of intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 66(4):596–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schlaff WD, Hurst BS (1995) Preoperative sonographic measurement of endometrial pattern predicts outcome of surgical repair in patients with severe Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 63(2):410–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57379-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Salle B, Gaucherand P, de Saint HP, Rudigoz RC (1999) Transvaginal sonohysterographic evaluation of intrauterine adhesions. J Clin Ultrasound 27(3):131–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199903/04)27:3<131:aid-jcu5>3.0.co;2-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, Tan SL (2003) A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two- and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril 79(5):1222–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00154-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laganà AS, Ciancimino L, Mancuso A, Chiofalo B, Rizzo P, Triolo O (2014) 3D sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy: a cross-sectional study for the evaluation of endouterine diseases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290(6):1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3366-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Letterie GS, Haggerty MF (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of intrauterine synechiae. Gynecol Obstet Invest 37(1):66–68. https://doi.org/10.1159/000292525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bacelar AC, Wilcock D, Powell M, Worthington BS (1995) The value of MRI in the assessment of traumatic intra-uterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome). Clin Radiol 50(2):80–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82984-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiofalo B, Palmara V, Vilos GA, Pacheco LA, Lasmar RB, Shawki O, Giacobbe V, Alibrandi A, Di Guardo F, Vitale SG (2019) Reproductive outcomes of infertile women undergoing “see and treat” office hysteroscopy: a retrospective observational study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1705352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deans R, Abbott J (2010) Review of intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(5):555–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Valle RF, Sciarra JJ (1988) Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 158(6 Pt 1):1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(88)90382-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Society TA (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49(6):944–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nasr AL, Al-Inany HG, Thabet SM, Aboulghar M (2000) A clinicohysteroscopic scoring system of intrauterine adhesions. Gynecol Obstet Invest 50(3):178–181. https://doi.org/10.1159/000010305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gitas G, Proppe L, Alkatout I, Rody A, Kotanidis C, Tsolakidis D, Baum S (2019) Accuracy of frozen section at early clinical stage of endometrioid endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis in Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300(1):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05158-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Te Linde RW, Rock JA, Thompson JD (1997) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  37. Capella-Allouc S (1999) Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 14(5):1230–1233. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.5.1230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vitale SG (2019) The biopsy snake grasper sec. VITALE: a new tool for office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bakas P, Gregoriou O, Hassiakos D, Liapis A, Creatsas M, Konidaris S (2012) Hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum and reproductive outcome in women with unexplained infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 73(4):321–325. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. DeCherney A, Polan ML (1983) Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine lesions and intractable uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 61(3):392–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cararach M, Penella J, Ubeda A, Labastida R (1994) Hysteroscopic incision of the septate uterus: scissors versus resectoscope. Hum Reprod 9(1):87–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Thomson AJ, Abbott JA, Kingston A, Lenart M, Vancaillie TG (2007) Fluoroscopically guided synechiolysis for patients with Asherman’s syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcomes. Fertil Steril 87(2):405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Broome JD, Vancaillie TG (1999) Fluoroscopically guided hysteroscopic division of adhesions in severe Asherman syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 93(6):1041–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00245-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bellingham FR (1996) Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic lysis and adjunctive methods. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 36(2):171–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb03279.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Protopapas A, Shushan A, Magos A (1998) Myometrial scoring: a new technique for the management of severe Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 69(5):860–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00036-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. McComb PF, Wagner BL (1997) Simplified therapy for Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 68(6):1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00413-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen FP, Soong YK, Hui YL (1997) Successful treatment of severe uterine synechiae with transcervical resectoscopy combined with laminaria tent. Hum Reprod 12(5):943–947. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.5.943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Coccia ME, Becattini C, Bracco GL, Pampaloni F, Bargelli G, Scarselli G (2001) Pressure lavage under ultrasound guidance: a new approach for outpatient treatment of intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 75(3):601–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01770-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Alkatout I, Mettler L (2017) Hysterectomy a comprehensive surgical approach. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 18(4):221–223. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Alkatout I (2015) [Communicative and ethical aspects of physician-patient relationship in extreme situations]. Wien Med Wochenschr (1946) 165(23–24):491–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-015-0385-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Feng ZC, Yang B, Shao J, Liu S (1999) Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy for traumatic intrauterine adhesions after induced abortions: clinical analysis of 365 cases. Gynaecol Endosc 8(2):95–98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1999.00245.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hanstede MM, van der Meij E, Goedemans L, Emanuel MH (2015) Results of centralized Asherman surgery, 2003–2013. Fertil Steril 104(6):1561–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu W, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Zhang S, Lin X (2018) Effect of early second-look hysteroscopy on reproductive outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with intrauterine adhesion, a retrospective study in China. Int J Surg 50:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Robinson JK, Colimon LMS, Isaacson KB (2008) Postoperative adhesiolysis therapy for intrauterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome). Fertil Steril 90(2):409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pabuccu R, Onalan G, Kaya C, Selam B, Ceyhan T, Ornek T, Kuzudisli E (2008) Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae. Fertil Steril 90(5):1973–1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Vesce F, Jorizzo G, Bianciotto A, Gotti G (2000) Use of the copper intrauterine device in the management of secondary amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 73(1):162–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00475-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. March CM, Israel R (1981) Gestational outcome following hysteroscopic lysis of adhesions. Fertil Steril 36(4):455–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45792-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Evans-Hoeker EA, Young SL (2014) Endometrial receptivity and intrauterine adhesive disease. Semin Reprod Med 32(5):392–401. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1376358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO (2003) A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00030-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Lin X, Wei M, Li TC, Huang Q, Huang D, Zhou F, Zhang S (2013) A comparison of intrauterine balloon, intrauterine contraceptive device and hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic surgery for Asherman syndrome: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170(2):512–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Farhi J, Bar-Hava I, Homburg R, Dicker D, Ben-Rafael Z (1993) Induced regeneration of endometrium following curettage for abortion: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 8(7):1143–1144. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Fedele L, Vercellini P, Viezzoli T, Ricciardiello O, Zamberletti D (1986) Intrauterine adhesions: current diagnostic and therapeutic trends. Acta Eur Fertil 17(1):31–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zikopoulos KA, Kolibianakis EM, Platteau P, de Munck L, Tournaye H, Devroey P, Camus M (2004) Live delivery rates in subfertile women with Asherman’s syndrome after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using the resectoscope or the Versapoint system. Reprod Biomed Online 8(6):720–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61654-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X (2008) Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 89(3):715–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Friedman A, DeFazio J, DeCherney A (1986) Severe obstetric complications after aggressive treatment of Asherman syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 67(6):864–867. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-198606000-00025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Queckborner S, Davies LC, von Grothusen C, Santamaria X, Simon C, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2019) Cellular therapies for the endometrium: an update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(5):672–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Malhotra N, Bahadur A, Kalaivani M, Mittal S (2012) Changes in endometrial receptivity in women with Asherman’s syndrome undergoing hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(2):525–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2336-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tan J, Li P, Wang Q, Li Y, Li X, Zhao D, Xu X, Kong L (2016) Autologous menstrual blood-derived stromal cells transplantation for severe Asherman’s syndrome. Hum Reprod 31(12):2723–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cao Y, Sun H, Zhu H, Zhu X, Tang X, Yan G, Wang J, Bai D, Wang J, Wang L, Zhou Q, Wang H, Dai C, Ding L, Xu B, Zhou Y, Hao J, Dai J, Hu Y (2018) Allogeneic cell therapy using umbilical cord MSCs on collagen scaffolds for patients with recurrent uterine adhesion: a phase I clinical trial. Stem cell Res Ther 9(1):192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0904-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Aghajanova L, Horcajadas JA, Esteban FJ, Giudice LC (2010) The bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cell: potential progenitor of the endometrial stromal fibroblast. Biol Reprod 82(6):1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.082867

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Alawadhi F, Du H, Cakmak H, Taylor HS (2014) Bone marrow-derived stem cell (BMDSC) transplantation improves fertility in a murine model of Asherman’s syndrome. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096662

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Santamaria X, Cabanillas S, Cervello I, Arbona C, Raga F, Ferro J, Palmero J, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C (2016) Autologous cell therapy with CD133+ bone marrow-derived stem cells for refractory Asherman’s syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a pilot cohort study. Hum Reprod 31(5):1087–1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. von Bahr L, Batsis I, Moll G, Hagg M, Szakos A, Sundberg B, Uzunel M, Ringden O, Le Blanc K (2012) Analysis of tissues following mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in humans indicates limited long-term engraftment and no ectopic tissue formation. Stem Cells 30(7):1575–1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wysoczynski M, Khan A, Bolli R (2018) New paradigms in cell therapy: repeated dosing, intravenous delivery, immunomodulatory actions, and new cell types. Circ Res 123(2):138–158. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Marx RE (2001) Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what is PRP and what is not PRP? Implant Dent 10(4):225–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200110000-00002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sampson S, Gerhardt M, Mandelbaum B (2008) Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1(3–4):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-008-9032-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Anitua E, Orive G (2010) Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J Periodontol 81(6):819–826. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Reurink G, Verhaar JA, Tol JL (2014) More on platelet-rich plasma injections in acute muscle injury. N Engl J Med 371(13):1264–1265. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1409204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Le ADK, Enweze L, DeBaun MR, Dragoo JL (2019) Platelet-rich plasma. Clin Sports Med 38(1):17–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2018.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Aghajanova L, Houshdaran S, Balayan S, Manvelyan E, Irwin JC, Huddleston HG, Giudice LC (2018) In vitro evidence that platelet-rich plasma stimulates cellular processes involved in endometrial regeneration. J Assist Reprod Genet 35(5):757–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1130-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Chang Y, Li J, Chen Y, Wei L, Yang X, Shi Y, Liang X (2015) Autologous platelet-rich plasma promotes endometrial growth and improves pregnancy outcome during in vitro fertilization. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(1):1286–1290

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Tandulwadkar SR, Naralkar MV, Surana AD, Selvakarthick M, Kharat AH (2017) Autologous intrauterine platelet-rich plasma instillation for suboptimal endometrium in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci 10(3):208–212. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_28_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Molina A, Sanchez J, Sanchez W, Vielma V (2018) Platelet-rich plasma as an adjuvant in the endometrial preparation of patients with refractory endometrium. JBRA Assist Reprod 22(1):42–48. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Nazari L, Salehpour S, Hoseini S, Zadehmodarres S, Azargashb E (2019) Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma on endometrial expansion in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a double-blind RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd) 17(6):443–448. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i6.4816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Sardana D, Upadhyay AJ, Deepika K, Pranesh GT, Rao KA (2014) Correlation of subendometrial-endometrial blood flow assessment by two-dimensional power Doppler with pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. J Hum Reprod Sci 7(2):130–135. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.138872

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was not supported by any fund/Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Giovanni Vitale.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not required for this type of study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puente Gonzalo, E., Alonso Pacheco, L., Vega Jiménez, A. et al. Intrauterine infusion of platelet-rich plasma for severe Asherman syndrome: a cutting-edge approach. Updates Surg 73, 2355–2362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00828-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00828-0

Keywords

Navigation