Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound appearances of enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with pathological findings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 05 August 2015

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and pathological findings. The CEUS enhancement patterns of 40 pathologically proven ICC lesions were retrospectively analysed. Pathologically, the degree of tumour cell and fibrosis distribution in the lesion was semi-quantitatively evaluated. Four enhancement patterns were observed in the arterial phase for 32 mass-forming ICCs: peripheral rim-like hyperenhancement (n = 19); heterogeneous hyperenhancement (n = 6); homogeneous hyperenhancement (n = 3); and heterogeneous hypo-enhancement (n = 4). Among the four enhancement patterns, the differences in tumour cell distribution were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The hyperenhancing area on CEUS corresponded to more tumour cells for mass-forming ICCs. Heterogeneous hyperenhancement (n = 2) and heterogeneous hypo-enhancement (n = 2) were observed in the arterial phase for four periductal-infiltrating ICCs. In this subtype, fibrosis was more commonly found in the lesions. Heterogeneous hyperenhancement (n = 1) and homogeneous hyperenhancement (n = 3) were observed in the arterial phase for four intraductal-growing ICCs. This subtype tended to have abundant tumour cells. The CEUS findings of ICC relate to the degree of carcinoma cell proliferation at pathological examination. Hyperenhancing areas in the tumour always indicated increased density of cancer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, Gunderson LL, Nagorney DM (1999) Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med 341:1368–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD (2005) Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 366:1303–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan SA, Taylor-Robinson SD, Toledano MB, Beck A, Elliott P, Thomas HC (2002) Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours. J Hepatol 37:806–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel T (2001) Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology 33:1353–1357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor-Robinson SD, Toledano MB, Arora S, Keegan TJ, Hargreaves S, Beck A et al (2001) Increase in mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in England and Wales 1968–1998. Gut 48:816–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1989) The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Jpn J Surg 19:98–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim JH (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 181:819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim JH, Park CK (2004) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:540–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F et al (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen LD, Xu HX, Xie XY, Lu MD, Xu ZF, Liu GJ et al (2008) Enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT. Br J Radiol 81:881–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T, Nishie A, Hirakawa M et al (2006) Delayed-phase dynamic CT enhancement as a prognostic factor for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Radiology 238:150–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacomis JM, Baron RL, Oliver JH, Nalesnik MA, Federle MP (1997) Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns. Radiology 203:98–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshida Y, Imai Y, Murakami T, Nishikawa M, Kurokawa M, Yonezawa T et al (1999) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with marked hypervascularity. Abdom Imaging 24:66–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilana R, Forner A, Bianchi L, Garcı′a-Criado A, Rimola J, de Lope CR et al (2010) Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Hepatology 51:2020–2029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu HX, Liu GJ, Lu MD, Xie XY, Xu ZF, Zheng YL et al (2006) Characterization of focal liver lesions using contrast enhanced sonography with a low mechanical index mode and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. J Clin Ultrasound 34:261–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu HX, Lu MD, Liu GJ, Xie XY, Xu ZF, Zheng YL et al (2006) Imaging of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma with low mechanical index contrast enhanced sonography and SonoVue: initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 25:23–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen LD, Xu HX, Xie XY, Xie XH, Xu ZF, Liu GJ et al (2010) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: differential diagnosis with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol 20:743–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okamura N, Yoshida M, Shibuya A, Sugiura H, Okayasu I, Ohbu M (2005) Cellular and stromal characteristics in the scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with hepatocellular carcinomas and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Pathol Int 55:724–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maetani Y, Itoh K, Watanabe C, Shibata T, Ametani F, Yamabe H et al (2001) MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 176:1499–1507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:1208–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Loria.

Additional information

The article has been retracted upon request of the authors as it contains similarities with paragraphs of a previously published article: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with pathological examination. H.-X. Xu et al; British Journal of Radiology 2012; 85:1029-1037.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loria, F., Loria, G., Basile, S. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound appearances of enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with pathological findings. Updates Surg 66, 135–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0251-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0251-6

Keywords

Navigation