Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A two-phase approach to elicit and measure beliefs on management strategies: Fishers supportive and aware of trade-offs associated with stock enhancement

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding fisher beliefs and attitudes towards specific management strategies can help inform and improve fisheries management, and thus stock sustainability. Previous studies highlight a lack of fisher awareness regarding environmental issues influencing the systems they utilise and the negative impacts of specific strategies, such as stock enhancement. Our study used a two-phase approach to first elicit and then measure the strength of common fishers’ beliefs and associated attitudes regarding stock enhancement. Specifically, this research focused on recreational fishers of an estuarine crab fishery (Portunus armatus) in south-western Australia. The results demonstrate that recreational fishers believe stock enhancement could have strong positive outcomes, but also recognise that this management strategy could lead to some negative outcomes, though the latter are perceived as less likely to happen. This contrasts with previous research on fisheries stocking and demonstrates the value of using the two-phase approach to clarify fishers’ perceptions of particular management approaches. To reduce fisher dissatisfaction with management actions, careful communication on the benefits and costs of stock enhancement is recommended. Our study highlights the significance of integrating social sciences into fisheries research, and the need to better understand fishing community beliefs to ensure effective management of the fishery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Emily Ogier and Sarah Jennings from the Human Dimension Research subprogram of the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation of Australia (FRDC) are thanked for their useful input as are Zoe Stewart-Yates, Denis Abagna and Kurt Krispyn for their help in conducting the surveys. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable input on the manuscript. This study was supported by funding from the FRDC (FRDC 2016/034) on behalf of the Australian Government, by Recfishwest and Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development through funding from the Recreational Fishing Initiatives Fund and Murdoch University. All work was conducted in accordance with Murdoch University Human Ethic Permit 2017/129.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Obregón.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obregón, C., Hughes, M., Loneragan, N.R. et al. A two-phase approach to elicit and measure beliefs on management strategies: Fishers supportive and aware of trade-offs associated with stock enhancement. Ambio 49, 640–649 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01212-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01212-y

Keywords

Navigation