Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The machinery of the weight-based fusion model for community detection in node-attributed social networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Social Network Analysis and Mining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The weight-based fusion model (WBFM) is among the simplest and most efficient ones for modularity-driven community detection (CD) in node-attributed social networks (ASNs) that contain both links between social actors (“structure”) and the actors’ feature vectors (“attributes”). Roughly speaking, the WBFM first converts the attributes into an attributive network so that one obtains the two networks—structural and attributive—instead of the ASN. Then, the two networks are fused into a composite one that is believed to contain the information about both the structure and the attributes and that can be already fed to traditional modularity-driven graph CD approaches. While the WBFM is widely used, it has been understudied analytically and had only a heuristic ground. In this paper, we disclose the mathematical machinery of the WBFM by revealing the objective function of the corresponding optimization CD process and establishing its connection with the traditional ASN CD quality measures. We also propose a pioneering non-manual parameter tuning scheme that provides the desired impact of the structure and the attributes on the CD results within the WBFM. Based on our theoretical results, we further present a well-tunable Leiden-based ASN CD algorithm that declares itself fast and accurate in our multiple experiments with synthetic and real-world datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An edge weight may be zero and this indicates that there is no social connection.

  2. For nominal or textual attributes, it is common to use one-hot encoding or embeddings to obtain their numerical representation.

  3. Communities may be overlapping if necessary but here we focus on disjoint ones.

  4. As before, \(G_S=(\mathcal {V},\mathcal {E},\mathcal {W})\) is just the structure of G.

  5. https://linqs.soe.ucsc.edu/data.

  6. https://www-personal.umich.edu/ mejn/netdata/.

  7. https://github.com/smileyan448/Sinanet.

  8. https://linqs.soe.ucsc.edu/data.

References

  • Akbas E, Zhao P (2019) Graph clustering based on attribute-aware graph embedding. In: Karampelas P, Kawash J, Özyer T (eds) From security to community detection in social networking platforms. Springer, Cham, pp 109–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alinezhad E, Teimourpour B, Sepehri MM, Kargari M (2020) Community detection in attributed networks considering both structural and attribute similarities: two mathematical programming approaches. Neural Comput Appl 32:3203–3220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atzmueller M, Günnemann S, Zimmermann A (2021) Mining communities and their descriptions on attributed graphs: a survey. Data Min Knowl Dis 35(3):661–687

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Statist Mech Theory Exp 10:P10008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollobás B (2001) Random Graphs. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bothorel C, Cruz J, Magnani M, Micenková B (2015) Clustering attributed graphs: models, measures and methods. Netw Sci 3(3):408–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty T, Dalmia A, Mukherjee A, Ganguly N (2017) Metrics for community analysis: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 50(4):54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Zhou Y, Huang X, Yu JX (2012) Clustering large attributed information networks: an efficient incremental computing approach. Data Min Knowl Dis 25(3):450–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chunaev P (2020) Community detection in node-attributed social networks: a survey. Comp Sci Rev 37:100286

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chunaev P, Gradov T, Bochenina K (2020) Community detection in node-attributed social networks: How structure-attributes correlation affects clustering quality. In: Procedia Computer Science, 178:355—364. In: Proceedings of the 9th international young scientists conference in computational science, YSC2020, 05-12 September 2020

  • Chunaev P, Gradov T, Bochenina K (2021) Composite modularity and parameter tuning in the weight-based fusion model for community detection in node-attributed social networks. In: Benito RM, Cherifi C, Cherifi H, Moro E, Rocha LM, Sales-Pardo M (eds) Complex networks & their applications IX. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 100–111

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chunaev, P., Nuzhdenko, I., and Bochenina, K. (2019). Community detection in attributed social networks: A unified weight-based model and its regimes. In: 2019 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pages 455–464

  • Combe, D., Largeron, C., Egyed-Zsigmond, E., and Gery, M. (2012). Combining relations and text in scientific network clustering. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM’12, pages 1248–1253

  • Cruz J, Bothorel C, Poulet F (2011a) Entropy based community detection in augmented social networks. In: International Conference on Computational Aspects of Social Networks 163–168

  • Cruz J, Bothorel C, Poulet F (2011b) Semantic clustering of social networks using points of view. In: Conférence en recherche d’information et applications, pp 1–8

  • Cruz J, Bothorel C, Poulet F (2012) Détection et visualisation des communautés dans les réseaux sociaux. Revue d’intelligence Artificielle 26:369–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang TA, Viennet E (2012) Community detection based on structural and attribute similarities. In: Proceedings of the international conference on digital society, ICDS 2012, pp 7–14

  • Danon L, Díaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A (2005) Comparing community structure identification. J Statist Mech Theory Exp 09:P09008

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore A, Donath J (2005) Homophily in online dating: When do you like someone like yourself? In: CHI EA '05: CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 1371–1374

  • He C, Liu S, Zhang L, Zheng J (2019) A fuzzy clustering based method for attributed graph partitioning. J Amb Intell Human Comput 10(9):3399–3407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hric D, Darst RK, Fortunato S (2014) Community detection in networks: structural communities versus ground truth. Phys Rev E 90:062805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Wang C, Wang B (2019) NMLPA: Uncovering overlapping communities in attributed networks via a multi-label propagation approach. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 19(2):260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jebabli M, Cherifi H, Cherifi C, Hamouda A (2018) Community detection algorithm evaluation with ground-truth data. Phys A Statist Mech Appl 492:651–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia C, Li Y, Carson MB, Wang X, Yu J (2017) Node attribute-enhanced community detection in complex networks. Sci Rep 7:2626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossinets G, Watts DJ (2009) Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. Am J Sociol 115:405–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S, Radicchi F (2008) Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. Phys Rev E 78:046110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Guo R, Liu C, Liu H (2019) Adaptive unsupervised feature selection on attributed networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD’19, pp 92–100

  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27(1):415–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Rui X, Wang Z, Xing Y, Cao L (2018) Coupled node similarity learning for community detection in attributed networks. Entropy 20(6):471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz W, Khan K-U, Lee Y-K, Lee S (2015) Intra graph clustering using collaborative similarity measure. Distrib Parallel Databases 33(4):583–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, J., Adler, M., and Jensen, D. (2003). Clustering relational data using attribute and link information. In: Proceedings of the Text Mining and Link Analysis Workshop, 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 9–15

  • Newman M, Clauset A (2015) Structure and inference in annotated networks. Nature Commun 7:11863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69:026113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orman GK, Labatut V, Cherifi H (2012) Comparative evaluation of community detection algorithms: a topological approach. J Statist Mech Theory Exp 08:P08001

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel L, Larremore DB, Clauset A (2017) The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks. Sci Adv 3(5):e1602548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin M, Jin D, Lei K, Gabrys B, Musial-Gabrys K (2018) Adaptive community detection incorporating topology and content in social networks. Knowl Based Syst 161:342–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan Y, Fuhry D, Parthasarathy S (2013) Efficient community detection in large networks using content and links. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd international conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’13, pp 1089–1098

  • Steinhaeuser K, Chawla NV (2010) Identifying and evaluating community structure in complex networks. Pattern Recognit Lett 31(5):413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2019) From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep 9(1):5233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira AR, Campos P, Brito P (2020) New contributions for the comparison of community detection algorithms in attributed networks. J Complex Netw 8(4):cnaa044

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Jin, D., Cao, X., Yang, L., and Zhang, W. (2016). Semantic community identification in large attribute networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI’16, pages 265–271. AAAI Press

  • Wang, X., Tang, L., Gao, H., and Liu, H. (2010). Discovering overlapping groups in social media. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 569–578

  • Xu, Z., Ke, Y., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., and Cheng, J. (2012). A model-based approach to attributed graph clustering. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 505–516

  • Xu Z, Ke Y, Wang Y, Cheng H, Cheng J (2014) Gbagc: a general bayesian framework for attributed graph clustering. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 9(1):1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., McAuley, J. J., and Leskovec, J. (2013). Community detection in networks with node attributes. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 1151–1156

  • Yang T, Jin R, Chi Y, Zhu S (2009) Combining link and content for community detection: a discriminative approach. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD ’09, pp 927–936

  • Yang Z, Algesheimer R, Tessone CJ (2016) A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. Sci Rep 6:30750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Cheng H, Yu JX (2009) Graph clustering based on structural/attribute similarities. Proc VLDB Endow 2(1):718–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Cheng H, Yu JX (2010) Clustering large attributed graphs: An efficient incremental approach. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on data mining, ICDM ’10, pp 689–698

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Agreement 17-71-30029, with co-financing of Bank Saint Petersburg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Centre for Cognitive Technologies, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Petr Chunaev, Timofey Gradov & Klavdiya Bochenina

Authors
  1. Petr Chunaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timofey Gradov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Klavdiya Bochenina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Chunaev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chunaev, P., Gradov, T. & Bochenina, K. The machinery of the weight-based fusion model for community detection in node-attributed social networks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11, 109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00811-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00811-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation